NVIDIA 367.27 Linux 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4 testing with a GIGABYTE MG50-G20-ZB v01234567 and ASPEED ASPEED Family on Ubuntu 14.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. GeForce GTX 1070: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1.0, Chipset: Intel Sky Lake, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8192MB (1505/4006MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel Connection OS: Ubuntu 16.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-22-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Unity 7.4.0, Display Driver: NVIDIA 367.27, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.8, Compiler: GCC 5.3.1 20160413 + CUDA 8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 AAAAABBBBB: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4 @ 3.20GHz (56 Cores), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MG50-G20-ZB v01234567, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 23.625 x 32768 MB 2400MHz Micron, Disk: 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BB24 + 4 x 1600GB INTEL SSDSC2BB01, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Solarflare SFC9120 OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Kernel: 4.4.0-31-generic (x86_64), Vulkan: 1.0.42, Compiler: GCC 4.8.4, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 FinanceBench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Monte-Carlo OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 597.63 |==================================================== FinanceBench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 9.27 |====================================================== Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Integer GIOPS > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 2038.81 |=================================================== Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Double Precision GFLOPS > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 227.75 |==================================================== Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Single Precision GFLOPS > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 6547.28 |=================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: CUDA - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 373.56 |==================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 Target: CUDA - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 7081.05 |=================================================== DiRT Showdown Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Multi-Sampling: 8x MSAA Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 132.37 |==================================================== Dota 2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 97.97 |===================================================== Dota 2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: Vulkan Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 77.07 |===================================================== F1 2015 Test: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra Quality Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 86.48 |===================================================== Portal Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 348.46 |==================================================== The Talos Principle Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 144.53 |==================================================== Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 244.55 |==================================================== Team Fortress 2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 122.93 |==================================================== Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 79.28 |===================================================== Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 82.83 |===================================================== Xonotic 0.8 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 181.49 |==================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 6117 |====================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 2780 |====================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 13021 |===================================================== Caffe AlexNet 2016-06-11 Build: CUDA Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better GeForce GTX 1070 . 11686.83 |==================================================