smoke test xeon e23 Intel Xeon E-2388G testing with a ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS) and Intel RocketLake-S [UHD ] on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Intel RocketLake-S [UHD ], Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 b: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Intel RocketLake-S [UHD ], Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 c: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2388G @ 3.20GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack E3C252D4U (1.22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-H, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: Intel RocketLake-S [UHD ], Monitor: VA2431, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, Vulkan: 1.3.238, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 104 104 104 - RT: 60 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 3.65237 |================================================================== b . 3.64924 |================================================================== c . 3.65082 |================================================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better a . 4060.69 |================================================================== b . 4041.13 |================================================================== c . 4041.49 |================================================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better a . 381.97 |=================================================================== b . 380.11 |=================================================================== c . 377.48 |================================================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better a . 15.28 |==================================================================== b . 15.20 |==================================================================== c . 15.10 |=================================================================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better a . 1.84476 |================================================================== b . 1.84751 |================================================================== c . 1.84863 |================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better a . 192619900 |================================================================ b . 190611300 |=============================================================== c . 190589800 |=============================================================== libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 32 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better a . 55.8 |===================================================================== b . 55.4 |===================================================================== c . 55.4 |===================================================================== libxsmm 2-1.17-3645 M N K: 64 GFLOPS/s > Higher Is Better a . 110.2 |==================================================================== b . 109.4 |==================================================================== c . 109.5 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 9.22430 |================================================================== b . 9.26427 |================================================================== c . 9.16944 |================================================================= HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 22.31 |==================================================================== b . 22.32 |==================================================================== c . 22.23 |==================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.25314 |================================================================== b . 4.25839 |================================================================== c . 4.25222 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 9.02695 |================================================================== b . 8.97420 |================================================================== c . 8.97268 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: FFTW - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.37091 |================================================================== b . 8.36259 |================================================================== c . 8.32575 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: float - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 23.80 |==================================================================== b . 23.82 |==================================================================== c . 23.63 |=================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: c2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.22813 |================================================================== b . 4.23400 |================================================================== c . 4.23098 |================================================================== HeFFTe - Highly Efficient FFT for Exascale 2.3 Test: r2c - Backend: Stock - Precision: double - X Y Z: 128 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.87633 |================================================================== b . 8.85636 |================================================================== c . 8.86055 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.16 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 301.65 |=================================================================== b . 300.84 |=================================================================== c . 296.75 |================================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 44.70 |==================================================================== b . 44.90 |==================================================================== c . 44.89 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 58.46 |==================================================================== b . 58.53 |==================================================================== c . 58.48 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 708.09 |=================================================================== b . 710.27 |=================================================================== c . 710.07 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 439.65 |=================================================================== b . 441.61 |=================================================================== c . 441.50 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 5743.30 |================================================================== b . 5770.72 |================================================================== c . 5770.77 |================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 210.90 |=================================================================== b . 211.14 |=================================================================== c . 211.84 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 154.27 |=================================================================== b . 155.10 |=================================================================== c . 154.84 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 385.29 |=================================================================== b . 385.62 |=================================================================== c . 386.90 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 308.94 |=================================================================== b . 310.44 |=================================================================== c . 311.22 |=================================================================== OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 959.78 |=================================================================== b . 961.47 |=================================================================== c . 962.75 |=================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Mount St. Helens Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 91.74 |==================================================================== b . 90.65 |=================================================================== c . 89.10 |================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 238.30 |================================================================== b . 240.62 |=================================================================== c . 232.39 |================================================================= SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Tomographic Model Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 87.21 |================================================================= b . 88.22 |================================================================== c . 90.71 |==================================================================== SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Homogeneous Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 113.86 |=================================================================== b . 111.56 |================================================================== c . 111.02 |================================================================= SPECFEM3D 4.0 Model: Water-layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 231.64 |================================================================== b . 234.44 |=================================================================== c . 233.71 |=================================================================== Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 1.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 24.80 |==================================================================== b . 24.96 |==================================================================== c . 24.96 |==================================================================== Z3 Theorem Prover 4.12.1 SMT File: 2.smt2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 72.46 |==================================================================== b . 71.44 |=================================================================== c . 71.35 |=================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better a . 4126.31 |================================================================= b . 4191.53 |================================================================== c . 4191.72 |================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.00 |===================================================================== b . 4.01 |===================================================================== c . 4.02 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.70 |==================================================================== b . 8.81 |===================================================================== c . 8.83 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1.39 |===================================================================== b . 1.39 |===================================================================== c . 1.39 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7.22 |===================================================================== b . 7.23 |===================================================================== c . 7.22 |===================================================================== simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better a . 8.85 |==================================================================== b . 8.92 |==================================================================== c . 8.99 |===================================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better a . 1946.8 |=================================================================== b . 1934.8 |=================================================================== c . 1933.8 |=================================================================== Xmrig 6.18.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better a . 3410.3 |=================================================================== b . 3349.9 |================================================================== c . 3418.8 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 12.3 |===================================================================== b . 12.3 |===================================================================== c . 12.3 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1753.1 |================================================================== b . 1750.5 |================================================================== c . 1770.3 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 7.43 |===================================================================== b . 7.43 |===================================================================== c . 7.45 |===================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better a . 1638.7 |=================================================================== b . 1636.5 |=================================================================== c . 1643.8 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Default MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 20.20 |==================================================================== b . 20.17 |==================================================================== c . 20.19 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100 MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 12.94 |==================================================================== b . 12.95 |==================================================================== c . 12.96 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 1.87 |==================================================================== b . 1.86 |==================================================================== c . 1.89 |===================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 4.29 |===================================================================== b . 4.29 |===================================================================== c . 4.28 |===================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression MP/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.71 |==================================================================== b . 0.71 |==================================================================== c . 0.72 |===================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: Downlink Processor Benchmark Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 932.7 |==================================================================== b . 934.8 |==================================================================== c . 936.4 |==================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 1159.4 |=================================================================== b . 1083.3 |=============================================================== c . 1135.6 |================================================================== srsRAN Project 23.5 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread Mbps > Higher Is Better a . 312.5 |=================================================================== b . 317.9 |==================================================================== c . 317.1 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 16056 |==================================================================== b . 16041 |==================================================================== c . 16056 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 67208 |==================================================================== b . 67242 |==================================================================== c . 67686 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 15830 |==================================================================== b . 15849 |==================================================================== c . 15787 |==================================================================== John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: HMAC-SHA512 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 85798000 |================================================================= b . 85790000 |================================================================= c . 85004000 |================================================================ John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better a . 1553000 |================================================================== b . 1564000 |================================================================== c . 1556000 |================================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 8850 |===================================================================== b . 8754 |==================================================================== c . 8814 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.79 |=================================================================== b . 1.83 |===================================================================== c . 1.79 |=================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.16 |===================================================================== b . 1.08 |================================================================ c . 1.09 |================================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2.85 |===================================================================== b . 2.85 |===================================================================== c . 2.84 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1.30 |===================================================================== b . 1.29 |==================================================================== c . 1.29 |==================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better a . 7.63 |===================================================================== b . 7.63 |===================================================================== c . 7.49 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 6.72 |==================================================================== b . 6.79 |===================================================================== c . 6.74 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 16.91 |=================================================================== b . 17.04 |==================================================================== c . 17.03 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 21.14 |==================================================================== b . 21.23 |==================================================================== c . 21.05 |=================================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 29.37 |==================================================================== b . 29.35 |==================================================================== c . 29.31 |==================================================================== SVT-AV1 1.6 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.141 |==================================================================== b . 3.126 |=================================================================== c . 3.151 |==================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1.62 |===================================================================== b . 1.62 |===================================================================== c . 1.63 |===================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 33.42 |==================================================================== b . 33.09 |=================================================================== c . 33.42 |==================================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 65.83 |==================================================================== b . 65.85 |==================================================================== c . 65.60 |==================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 42.65 |=================================================================== b . 42.84 |==================================================================== c . 43.07 |==================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 48.42 |==================================================================== b . 48.26 |==================================================================== c . 48.18 |==================================================================== SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 39.72 |==================================================================== b . 39.73 |==================================================================== c . 39.71 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 4.27 |===================================================================== b . 4.28 |===================================================================== c . 4.27 |===================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 4.75 |===================================================================== b . 4.77 |===================================================================== c . 4.76 |===================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 23.85 |=================================================================== b . 24.10 |==================================================================== c . 23.77 |=================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 26.93 |==================================================================== b . 26.83 |==================================================================== c . 26.79 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.08 |==================================================================== b . 14.13 |==================================================================== c . 14.11 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 14.70 |=================================================================== b . 14.81 |==================================================================== c . 14.71 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 17.99 |==================================================================== b . 18.00 |==================================================================== c . 18.12 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 69.50 |================================================================= b . 72.22 |==================================================================== c . 72.23 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 74.64 |==================================================================== b . 74.90 |==================================================================== c . 74.48 |==================================================================== uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 96.33 |==================================================================== b . 95.58 |=================================================================== c . 93.03 |================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.529 |==================================================================== b . 3.527 |==================================================================== c . 3.513 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 7.432 |==================================================================== b . 7.458 |==================================================================== c . 7.472 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 11.09 |=================================================================== b . 11.24 |==================================================================== c . 11.26 |==================================================================== VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Faster Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 25.34 |==================================================================== b . 25.47 |==================================================================== c . 25.42 |==================================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 11.51 |=================================================================== b . 11.73 |==================================================================== c . 11.56 |=================================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 58.45 |================================================================== b . 59.97 |==================================================================== c . 59.70 |==================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.34 |===================================================================== b . 0.34 |===================================================================== c . 0.34 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.34 |===================================================================== b . 0.34 |===================================================================== c . 0.34 |===================================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 2.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only Images / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 0.16 |===================================================================== b . 0.16 |===================================================================== c . 0.16 |===================================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 154 |====================================================================== b . 155 |====================================================================== c . 154 |====================================================================== OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar Items / Sec > Higher Is Better a . 69 |======================================================================= b . 69 |======================================================================= c . 69 |======================================================================= OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.72924 |================================================================= b . 3.77037 |================================================================== c . 3.74212 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.75234 |================================================================== b . 3.75720 |================================================================== c . 3.75544 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 148.26 |=================================================================== b . 148.97 |=================================================================== c . 148.50 |=================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.17345 |================================================================= b . 3.23141 |================================================================== c . 3.22055 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.17488 |================================================================== b . 3.18652 |================================================================== c . 3.19263 |================================================================== OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time Items Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 3.77067 |================================================================== b . 3.78168 |================================================================== c . 3.77000 |================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better a . 60277 |==================================================================== b . 60011 |=================================================================== c . 60515 |==================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better a . 53435 |==================================================================== b . 53604 |==================================================================== c . 53558 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 81.91 |==================================================================== b . 81.96 |==================================================================== c . 81.75 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 7.303 |==================================================================== b . 7.328 |==================================================================== c . 7.303 |==================================================================== libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 11.87 |==================================================================== b . 11.58 |================================================================== c . 11.59 |================================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 60.61 |==================================================================== b . 60.55 |==================================================================== c . 60.50 |==================================================================== Timed Gem5 Compilation 21.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 474.37 |=================================================================== b . 473.64 |=================================================================== c . 473.50 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 473.85 |=================================================================== b . 473.67 |=================================================================== c . 472.94 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 113.44 |=================================================================== b . 112.91 |=================================================================== c . 112.90 |=================================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1535.84 |================================================================== b . 1533.81 |================================================================== c . 1534.70 |================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 981.61 |=================================================================== b . 981.03 |=================================================================== c . 980.75 |=================================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 998.04 |=================================================================== b . 994.01 |=================================================================== c . 996.30 |=================================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 859.61 |=================================================================== b . 857.89 |=================================================================== c . 855.83 |=================================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 68.36 |==================================================================== b . 68.54 |==================================================================== c . 68.55 |==================================================================== Build2 0.15 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 189.45 |================================================================= b . 195.72 |=================================================================== c . 188.23 |================================================================ OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 2696 |===================================================================== b . 2704 |===================================================================== c . 2691 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 3256 |===================================================================== b . 3263 |===================================================================== c . 3264 |===================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 42834 |==================================================================== b . 43011 |==================================================================== c . 42853 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 88765 |==================================================================== b . 88710 |==================================================================== c . 88742 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 52071 |==================================================================== b . 52002 |==================================================================== c . 51903 |==================================================================== OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer ms < Lower Is Better a . 107002 |=================================================================== b . 106674 |=================================================================== c . 106444 |=================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better a . 571.01 |=================================================================== b . 574.91 |=================================================================== c . 564.42 |================================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 61.38 |=================================================================== b . 62.11 |==================================================================== c . 62.08 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 38.05 |==================================================================== b . 38.17 |==================================================================== c . 38.25 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better a . 132.73 |=================================================================== b . 132.30 |=================================================================== c . 132.03 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 113.49 |=================================================================== b . 113.53 |=================================================================== c . 113.77 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better a . 22.25 |==================================================================== b . 22.24 |==================================================================== c . 22.19 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 170.20 |=================================================================== b . 170.46 |=================================================================== c . 169.84 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better a . 44.51 |==================================================================== b . 44.44 |==================================================================== c . 44.60 |==================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 170.63 |=================================================================== b . 170.37 |=================================================================== c . 170.09 |=================================================================== FFmpeg 6.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better a . 44.39 |==================================================================== b . 44.46 |==================================================================== c . 44.54 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 334.52 |=================================================================== b . 334.68 |=================================================================== c . 334.68 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 343.64 |================================================================== b . 342.56 |================================================================== c . 347.04 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: scrypt kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 242.47 |=================================================================== b . 242.77 |=================================================================== c . 244.07 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 8128.92 |================================================================= b . 8215.17 |================================================================== c . 8152.24 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 1685.16 |================================================================== b . 1686.70 |================================================================== c . 1683.88 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 592320 |=================================================================== b . 593650 |=================================================================== c . 594430 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 3305.88 |============================================================== b . 3273.74 |============================================================= c . 3516.83 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 75840 |==================================================================== b . 75200 |=================================================================== c . 75270 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 27670 |==================================================================== b . 27390 |=================================================================== c . 27240 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 54340 |==================================================================== b . 54340 |==================================================================== c . 54450 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 127140 |=================================================================== b . 123930 |================================================================= c . 124050 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.20.3 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better a . 177750 |================================================================== b . 181190 |=================================================================== c . 180730 |=================================================================== SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS marks > Higher Is Better a . 341310 |=================================================================== b . 341164 |=================================================================== c . 341479 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 7666522930 |=============================================================== b . 7571848920 |============================================================== c . 7670067840 |=============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 2982380940 |=============================================================== b . 2971930440 |=============================================================== c . 2958467610 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better a . 4750.7 |================================================================== b . 4803.9 |=================================================================== c . 4781.2 |=================================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better a . 155418.1 |================================================================= b . 155963.2 |================================================================= c . 155507.5 |================================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 53275943460 |============================================================== b . 53408719120 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 104474526240 |============================================================= b . 103818760740 |============================================================= OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 92098198730 |============================================================== b . 92618860950 |============================================================== OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better a . 36073985910 |============================================================= b . 36372738320 |============================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better a . 15.30 |==================================================================== b . 15.31 |==================================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 54005000 |================================================================= b . 54017000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 86164000 |================================================================= b . 86235000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 199620000 |================================================================ b . 200200000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 260980000 |=============================================================== b . 265830000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 331140000 |================================================================ b . 331500000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 409640000 |============================================================== b . 419540000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 21614000 |================================================================= b . 21593000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 502810000 |=============================================================== b . 513440000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 427490000 |=============================================================== b . 433120000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 79299000 |================================================================ b . 79964000 |================================================================= Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 131760000 |================================================================ b . 132110000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 162520000 |=============================================================== b . 165290000 |================================================================ ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 108.20 |=================================================================== b . 108.92 |=================================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 113.63 |=================================================================== b . 112.91 |=================================================================== ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean > Higher Is Better a . 113.53 |=================================================================== b . 111.97 |================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 88.63 |==================================================================== b . 84.22 |================================================================= Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 300 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 148.00 |================================================================== b . 149.70 |=================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.3.2 Bulk Size: 500 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 30 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 208.65 |================================================================== b . 212.42 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - SHA-512 Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 3.40 |===================================================================== b . 3.41 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 228.74 |=================================================================== b . 229.11 |=================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Calculate Pi Benchmark Using Dataframe Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 11.97 |=================================================================== b . 12.08 |==================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Group By Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 3.41 |=================================================================== b . 3.52 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Repartition Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2.83 |===================================================================== b . 2.49 |============================================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 2.07 |=================================================================== b . 2.14 |===================================================================== Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 - Broadcast Inner Join Test Time Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1.76 |===================================================================== b . 1.66 |================================================================= CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1585.2 |=================================================================== b . 1593.2 |=================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 10% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 35453.4 |================================================================== b . 35385.6 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 50% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 41502.1 |================================================================== b . 41631.8 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 60% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 43217.0 |================================================================== b . 43502.4 |================================================================== CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 128 ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 51806.0 |================================================================== b . 51957.3 |================================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3442545.53 |=============================================================== b . 3386413.69 |============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3390692.31 |=============================================================== b . 3407584.22 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3509365.98 |============================================================== b . 3551639.05 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3000846.79 |=============================================================== b . 3012041.19 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3569222.70 |=============================================================== b . 3580150.29 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3406857.67 |=============================================================== b . 3403187.91 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3339072.06 |=============================================================== b . 3331423.51 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2955396.42 |============================================================== b . 3009409.13 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3296080.94 |========================================================== b . 3582493.35 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3310390.02 |============================================================= b . 3418062.57 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3331550.72 |=============================================================== b . 3335026.97 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 10 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3004715.33 |=============================================================== b . 3004192.87 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 20 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3654927.90 |=============================================================== b . 3457130.11 |============================================================ Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3453155.48 |=============================================================== b . 3454075.39 |=============================================================== Dragonflydb 1.6.2 Clients Per Thread: 60 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3382163.21 |=============================================================== b . 3389154.48 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2339109.34 |============================================================== b . 2359355.53 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2257435.18 |============================================================== b . 2294635.17 |=============================================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2205533.41 |=============================================================== b . 2212508.18 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2436216.00 |=================================================== b . 2981034.75 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2854095.5 |================================================================ b . 2857194.0 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 165.02 |=================================================================== b . 164.75 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 965.57 |=================================================================== b . 964.26 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1353.7 |=================================================================== b . 1353.7 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1482.46 |================================================================== b . 1474.13 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1433.86 |================================================================== a . 1441.73 |================================================================== b . 1433.86 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1044.14 |================================================================= b . 1052.40 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1763.28 |================================================================= b . 1799.03 |================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Fast MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 154.04 |=================================================================== b . 154.35 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 58.99 |==================================================================== b . 58.97 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 7.7426 |=================================================================== b . 7.7458 |=================================================================== ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive MT/s > Higher Is Better a . 0.6255 |================================================================== b . 0.6319 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2023 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better a . 0.788 |==================================================================== b . 0.792 |==================================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 2331 |===================================================================== b . 2331 |===================================================================== MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 1117 |===================================================================== b . 1111 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 443309 |=================================================================== b . 433312 |================================================================= PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.128 |================================================================== a . 0.862 |=================================================== b . 1.154 |==================================================================== b . 0.914 |====================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better a . 516884 |=================================================================== b . 431809 |======================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 1.548 |====================================================== a . 1.900 |=================================================================== b . 1.853 |================================================================= b . 1.934 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 23466 |=================================================================== b . 23725 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 21.31 |==================================================================== a . 21.37 |==================================================================== b . 21.08 |=================================================================== b . 21.39 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better a . 17926 |==================================================================== b . 17895 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better a . 44.63 |==================================================================== a . 44.41 |==================================================================== b . 44.71 |==================================================================== b . 44.35 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 580068 |=================================================================== b . 546888 |=============================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 421150 |=================================================================== b . 413607 |================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 23394 |==================================================================== b . 23377 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency TPS > Higher Is Better a . 18016 |==================================================================== b . 18040 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 96.89 |==================================================================== b . 96.85 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 51.04 |==================================================================== b . 51.13 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 16.67 |==================================================================== b . 16.66 |==================================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 6.4.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 5.978 |=================================================================== b . 6.026 |==================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1955106.16 |=============================================================== b . 1961600.56 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 150.43 |=================================================================== b . 150.47 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 184.51 |=================================================================== b . 183.72 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 9518302.94 |=============================================================== b . 9479547.03 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1216559.18 |=============================================================== b . 1217587.51 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 991.84 |=================================================================== b . 990.07 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 2890357.12 |=============================================================== b . 2907882.78 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 432.67 |=================================================================== b . 435.20 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 4984063.29 |=============================================================== b . 5005404.32 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 414.05 |=================================================================== b . 413.94 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 15762.66 |================================================================= b . 15799.30 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 5618945.41 |=============================================================== b . 5601667.95 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1111.25 |================================================================== b . 1117.68 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 48219.80 |================================================================ b . 49261.36 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 141045.46 |================================================================ b . 141120.17 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 52.30 |==================================================================== b . 51.79 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 258759.70 |================================================================ b . 260683.73 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 175089.34 |================================================================ b . 175023.65 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 2781513.07 |=============================================================== b . 2662853.59 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 20892.0 |================================================================== b . 20885.5 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 17807994.42 |============================================================ b . 18253801.38 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 50172.84 |================================================================= b . 50285.11 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 48945.34 |================================================================= b . 48966.87 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 1023149.87 |=========================================================== b . 1088018.23 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 6049.55 |================================================================== b . 6071.93 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: x86_64 RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 77558.23 |================================================================= b . 77557.27 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 2935.09 |================================================================== b . 2934.41 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 909.43 |=================================================================== b . 901.49 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 3176.42 |================================================================== b . 3191.79 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 74496.86 |================================================================ b . 75262.63 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 8499.14 |================================================================= b . 8674.56 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 6575.45 |================================================================== b . 6566.50 |================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 535128.11 |================================================================ b . 534062.66 |================================================================ Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 3654011.84 |=============================================================== b . 3638488.52 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 10256067.84 |============================================================== b . 10261026.71 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 24089.87 |================================================================= b . 24054.53 |================================================================= Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 7013916.66 |=============================================================== b . 7009619.95 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 201.52 |================================================================== b . 203.66 |=================================================================== Stress-NG 0.16.04 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better a . 13144909.56 |============================================================== b . 13127961.92 |============================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 169.12 |=================================================================== b . 170.03 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 457.07 |=================================================================== b . 455.44 |=================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1748.10 |================================================================= b . 1774.34 |================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 565.27 |=================================================================== b . 556.90 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 1.34 |===================================================================== b . 1.33 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 2973.15 |================================================================== b . 2976.94 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 9.16 |===================================================================== b . 9.14 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 435.99 |=================================================================== b . 436.28 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 415.14 |================================================================== b . 419.36 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 9.62 |===================================================================== b . 9.53 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 27.40 |==================================================================== b . 27.33 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 145.90 |=================================================================== b . 146.26 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 907.43 |================================================================== b . 914.26 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.79 |===================================================================== b . 8.73 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 214.40 |=================================================================== b . 213.56 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 18.64 |==================================================================== b . 18.71 |==================================================================== OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better a . 8184.72 |================================================================== b . 8117.06 |================================================================= OpenVINO 2022.3 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.97 |==================================================================== b . 0.98 |===================================================================== Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 94988 |==================================================================== b . 95080 |==================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 34626013 |================================================================ b . 35318074 |================================================================= RocksDB 8.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 487163 |================================================================== b . 493105 |=================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1716478 |================================================================== b . 1714690 |================================================================== RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1527745 |================================================================= b . 1541034 |================================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better a . 664 |====================================================================== b . 662 |====================================================================== nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 68098.55 |================================================================ b . 68779.84 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 61494.71 |================================================================= b . 61686.55 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 52883.38 |================================================================= b . 53009.35 |================================================================= nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better a . 47841.37 |================================================================ b . 48357.65 |================================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 219.97 |=================================================================== b . 219.76 |=================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better a . 9551 |===================================================================== b . 9553 |===================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Integer Score > Higher Is Better a . 8905 |===================================================================== b . 8868 |===================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Multi Core Floating Point Score > Higher Is Better a . 10877 |=================================================================== b . 10970 |==================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better a . 2450 |===================================================================== b . 2457 |===================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Integer Score > Higher Is Better a . 2386 |===================================================================== b . 2391 |===================================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: CPU Single Core Floating Point Score > Higher Is Better a . 2574 |===================================================================== b . 2584 |===================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 3 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 25.89 |==================================================================== b . 25.89 |==================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 6 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 26.60 |==================================================================== b . 26.67 |==================================================================== EnCodec 0.1.1 Target Bandwidth: 24 kbps Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 31.71 |==================================================================== b . 31.85 |==================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.36 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 130412 |=================================================================== b . 129573 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Core ms < Lower Is Better a . 55345 |==================================================================== b . 55182 |==================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Stitching ms < Lower Is Better a . 269695 |=================================================================== b . 269533 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.7 Test: Image Processing ms < Lower Is Better a . 80674 |==================================================================== b . 80783 |==================================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 1168.13 |================================================================== b . 1168.61 |================================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 104940000 |================================================================ b . 105040000 |================================================================ Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 147466667 |================================================================ b . 144810000 |=============================================================== Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 samples/s > Higher Is Better a . 44031333 |================================================================= b . 44040000 |================================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 780967.47 |================================================================ b . 783425.31 |================================================================ Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 11.83 |==================================================================== b . 11.82 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1447958.54 |=============================================================== b . 1446859.96 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 20.68 |=================================================================== b . 20.85 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1175572.13 |============================================================== b . 1187104.23 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 10.09 |==================================================================== b . 9.97 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1869315.57 |=============================================================== b . 1868505.59 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 19.82 |==================================================================== b . 19.80 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1810868.13 |=============================================================== b . 1767214.52 |============================================================= Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 8.08 |================================================================== b . 8.39 |===================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2558694.08 |=============================================================== b . 2554316.08 |=============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 16.36 |==================================================================== b . 16.29 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 31169657.42 |============================================================= b . 31446324.62 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 49.28 |==================================================================== b . 48.76 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 35731058.31 |============================================================== b . 35881779.03 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 122.86 |=================================================================== b . 122.59 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 33440678.10 |============================================================= b . 33835269.57 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 51.82 |==================================================================== b . 51.04 |=================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 36535518.62 |============================================================== b . 36624182.35 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 128.26 |=================================================================== b . 127.24 |================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 37703435.51 |============================================================= b . 38375799.87 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 48.28 |==================================================================== b . 48.04 |==================================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 point/sec > Higher Is Better a . 32700015.96 |============================================================== b . 32929010.53 |============================================================== Apache IoTDB 1.1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 Average Latency < Lower Is Better a . 145.58 |=================================================================== b . 144.40 |================================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2679816.88 |=============================================================== b . 2601146.17 |============================================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2630980.74 |=============================================================== b . 2475916.43 |=========================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2627627.80 |=============================================================== b . 2625534.74 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2447990.86 |=============================================================== b . 2391013.39 |============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2544206.44 |============================================================== b . 2565838.51 |=============================================================== Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2493512.81 |=============================================================== b . 2464830.47 |============================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 14.02 |==================================================================== b . 14.02 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.52 |===================================================================== b . 3.54 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.84 |===================================================================== b . 2.85 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.18 |===================================================================== b . 2.18 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 2.54 |===================================================================== b . 2.54 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better a . 4.29 |===================================================================== b . 4.30 |===================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better a . 0.79 |===================================================================== b . 0.75 |================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better a . 10.30 |==================================================================== b . 10.07 |================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better a . 59.79 |==================================================================== b . 59.88 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.01 |===================================================================== b . 7.82 |=================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better a . 8.06 |===================================================================== b . 7.85 |=================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better a . 16.49 |==================================================================== b . 16.36 |=================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better a . 23.76 |==================================================================== b . 23.81 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better a . 10.34 |==================================================================== b . 10.41 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better a . 6.82 |===================================================================== b . 6.68 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: vision_transformer ms < Lower Is Better a . 72.05 |==================================================================== b . 72.07 |==================================================================== NCNN 20230517 Target: CPU - Model: FastestDet ms < Lower Is Better a . 3.52 |===================================================================== b . 3.51 |===================================================================== Blender 3.6 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 215.45 |=================================================================== b . 215.41 |===================================================================