2024-01-31-1541 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 testing with a Intel S2600CWR (SE5C610.86B.01.01.0028.121720182203 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on SystemRescue 10.01 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2402022-NE-INTELS26077&grs .
2024-01-31-1541 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Display Server Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #53 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #61 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads) Intel S2600CWR (SE5C610.86B.01.01.0028.121720182203 BIOS) Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT/s Samsung M393A4K40BB0-CPB 4 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM008-2UB1 + 3 x 480GB KINGSTON SA400S3 + 2 x 480GB TEAM T253480GB + 3001GB Seagate ST3000DM001-1CH1 + 123GB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] 2 x Intel I350 SystemRescue 10.01 6.1.30-1-lts (x86_64) X Server 1.21.1.8 GCC 13.1.1 20230429 btrfs 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: always Compiler Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #29, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #30, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #31, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #32, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #33, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #34, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #35, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #37, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #39, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #40, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #42, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #43, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #44, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #46, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #47, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #48, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #50, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #51, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #52, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #53, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #54, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #58, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #59, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #61: --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet=auto --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-default-ssp --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,d,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-link-serialization=1 --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-linker-hash-style=gnu Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0xb000040 Security Details - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX unsupported + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + mmio_stale_data: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable Java Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #36, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #55, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #56, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #57: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 20.0.1+9) Python Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45: Python 3.11.3
2024-01-31-1541 luxcorerender: Danish Mood - CPU luxcorerender: Orange Juice - CPU luxcorerender: LuxCore Benchmark - CPU luxcorerender: DLSC - CPU luajit: Dense LU Matrix Factorization luajit: Sparse Matrix Multiply luajit: Monte Carlo luajit: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation luajit: Fast Fourier Transform luajit: Composite kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Medium kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Slow kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Ultra Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Super Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Very Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Medium kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Slow java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Composite ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 4096 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 2048 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 512 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 128 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 4096 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 2048 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 128 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 4096 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 2048 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 512 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 256 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 128 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 4096 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 2048 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 256 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 128 intel-mlc: Idle Latency intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - All Reads intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver helsing: 14 digit hackbench: 32 - Process hackbench: 16 - Process hackbench: 8 - Process hackbench: 4 - Thread hackbench: 4 - Process hackbench: 2 - Thread hackbench: 2 - Process hackbench: 1 - Thread hackbench: 1 - Process gmpbench: Total Time fhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solving fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 512 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 256 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 128 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 64 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 32 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 512 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 256 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 128 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 64 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 32 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 512 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 256 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 128 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 64 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 32 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 512 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 256 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 128 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 64 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 32 ffmpeg: libx265 - Video On Demand ffmpeg: libx265 - Platform ffmpeg: libx265 - Upload ffmpeg: libx265 - Live ffmpeg: libx264 - Video On Demand ffmpeg: libx264 - Platform ffmpeg: libx264 - Upload ffmpeg: libx264 - Live etcpak: Multi-Threaded - DXT1 etcpak: Multi-Threaded - ETC2 etcpak: Single-Threaded - DXT1 etcpak: Single-Threaded - ETC2 espeak: Text-To-Speech Synthesis encode-flac: WAV To FLAC embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer - Crown embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Obj embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon ebizzy: easywave: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - 2400 easywave: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - 1200 easywave: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - 240 deepspeech: CPU dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit dav1d: Chimera 1080p dav1d: Summer Nature 4K dav1d: Summer Nature 1080p dacapobench: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing dacapobench: Spring Boot dacapobench: Apache Kafka dacapobench: jMonkeyEngine dacapobench: GraphChi dacapobench: BioJava Biological Data Framework dacapobench: Tradesoap dacapobench: Tradebeans dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: H2 Database Engine dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Engine dacapobench: Apache Lucene Search Index dacapobench: Apache Tomcat dacapobench: PMD Source Code Analyzer dacapobench: FOP Print Formatter dacapobench: Batik SVG Toolkit dacapobench: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework dacapobench: Eclipse cryptopp: All Algorithms cryptopp: Keyed Algorithms cryptopp: Unkeyed Algorithms crafty: Elapsed Time coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second core-latency: Average Latency Between CPU Cores compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 12 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 12 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3 - Compression Speed compress-xz: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed compress-gzip: Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz compress-7zip: Decompression Rating compress-7zip: Compression Rating clomp: Static OMP Speedup cachebench: Read / Modify / Write cachebench: Write cachebench: Read c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel build2: Time To Compile build-wasmer: Time To Compile build-nodejs: Time To Compile build-mplayer: Time To Compile build-llvm: Unix Makefiles build-llvm: Ninja build-godot: Time To Compile build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile build-eigen: Time To Compile botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 botan: Twofish - Decrypt botan: Twofish botan: KASUMI - Decrypt botan: KASUMI botan: CAST-256 - Decrypt botan: CAST-256 botan: Blowfish - Decrypt botan: Blowfish botan: AES-256 - Decrypt botan: AES-256 bork: File Encryption Time blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 256MB blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 128MB blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 64MB blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 32MB blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 16MB blosc: blosclz bitshuffle - 8MB blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 256MB blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 128MB blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 64MB blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 32MB blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 16MB blosc: blosclz noshuffle - 8MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 256MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 128MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 64MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 32MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 16MB blosc: blosclz shuffle - 8MB blake2: asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth aobench: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time amg: luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism - CPU helsing: 12 digit hackbench: 16 - Thread hackbench: 8 - Thread dacapobench: Apache Xalan XSLT aom-av1: Speed 11 Realtime - Bosphorus 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #53 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #61 2.69 5.68 2.87 3.45 2896.53 1086.12 438.92 1648.53 349.79 1283.98 34.70 26.84 20.54 9.58 9.21 138.72 111.34 80.75 35.15 33.56 4890.98 1700.53 1006.33 1463.68 325.22 1877.35 623763 873369 1055129 1153408 1258688 1256417 568475 664680 749609 782745 785571 811593 927982 1135568 1242633 1304421 1298656 1369982 908811 1115568 1222292 1280892 1312275 1414730 3355.425624 246.246 56.960 28.708 14.953 8.233 7.936 4.481 4.256 2.914 2.889 4003.4 11936.8 13260 21873 24402 23650 23188 25201 30500 33391 31744 34801 36919 34804 25690 17612 14821 11495.4 3538.0 3628.7 4790.7 4773.8 4676.4 4945.4 5277.8 6027.7 4983.7 5068.6 5246.8 5408.2 5341.2 5459.5 5935.1 5882.2 28.05 28.02 14.12 72.14 28.05 28.17 7.72 125.03 2655.454 2637.554 164.114 162.598 40.153 26.608 26.3674 27.7865 32.3760 25.0612 25.8821 28.8361 639819 510.443 201.941 7.362 160.40138 315.48 368.30 208.56 631.82 889 3766 6285 6959 6407 10587 9041 21536 8022 3038 4541 5652 3124 2339 924 1977 6002 16332 1154.017406 423.344573 251.763187 6197092 787673.319248 266.1041 534.2 6.69 526.9 12.0 571.9 141.5 629.9 518.5 607.5 592.7 590.9 1696.4 23.997 2785.2 25.35 2644.1 68.26 2769.3 511.25 44.457 122894 147251 24.6 65855.691992 46653.513904 8338.763430 36.528 146.057 62.823 435.890 29.062 605.601 496.800 293.746 44.469 134.302 640.088 645.305 283.144 283.621 70.579 73.095 110.337 110.268 340.581 340.017 2994.450 2955.895 11.038 4204.4 6205.2 8245.7 10177.7 11126.9 11126.0 3821.5 5375.2 6874.9 8405.6 10567.1 10729.4 4261.0 6372.4 8500.3 10689.3 12023.4 11465.5 4.55 61168569 38.227 669950867 12.46 2.707 39.207 16.810 2267 109.5 93628.64 77892.00 93052.31 100143.91 107701.82 89708.6 77968.1 93414.6 100245.7 107439.0 OpenBenchmarking.org
LuxCoreRender Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6053 1.2106 1.8159 2.4212 3.0265 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 2.69 MIN: 0.86 / MAX: 3.24
LuxCoreRender Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.278 2.556 3.834 5.112 6.39 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 5.68 MIN: 5.23 / MAX: 5.84
LuxCoreRender Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6458 1.2916 1.9374 2.5832 3.229 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 2.87 MIN: 0.9 / MAX: 3.47
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.7763 1.5526 2.3289 3.1052 3.8815 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 3.45 MIN: 3.33 / MAX: 3.64
LuaJIT Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 9.57, N = 3 2896.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 1086.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 438.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 1648.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.85, N = 3 349.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.15, N = 3 1283.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 34.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 26.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 9.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 9.21 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.15, N = 8 138.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.18, N = 7 111.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 6 80.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 35.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 33.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 24.86, N = 3 4890.98
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 1700.53
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.12, N = 3 1006.33
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.00, N = 3 1463.68
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 325.22
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.2 Computational Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.58, N = 3 1877.35
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 4234.73, N = 4 623763
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3940.78, N = 5 873369
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 6769.36, N = 5 1055129
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 11011.23, N = 6 1153408
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 4398.68, N = 6 1258688
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 3741.50, N = 6 1256417
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 4016.72, N = 4 568475
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 5640.23, N = 4 664680
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 5704.32, N = 4 749609
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4019.70, N = 4 782745
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3838.12, N = 5 785571
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4977.24, N = 5 811593
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 8481.75, N = 5 927982
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 10664.84, N = 6 1135568
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11543.29, N = 15 1242633
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15022.93, N = 15 1304421
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17954.69, N = 15 1298656
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 16442.79, N = 15 1369982
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7599.81, N = 5 908811
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 9054.93, N = 15 1115568
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 8590.49, N = 15 1222292
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10678.01, N = 6 1280892
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15454.67, N = 15 1312275
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17444.74, N = 15 1414730
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Idle Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Idle Latency 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.38, N = 7 109.5
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 40.88, N = 3 93628.64
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 175.98, N = 3 77892.00
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 86.36, N = 3 93052.31
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 69.78, N = 3 100143.91
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 37.26, N = 3 107701.82
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 148.63, N = 3 89708.6
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 174.39, N = 3 77968.1
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 163.47, N = 3 93414.6
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 170.35, N = 3 100245.7
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 176.52, N = 3 107439.0
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 2.64, N = 3 3355.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
Helsing Digit Range: 14 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 246.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 56.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.22, N = 15 28.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 14.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.011, N = 6 8.233 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.006, N = 6 7.936 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.0082 2.0164 3.0246 4.0328 5.041 SE +/- 0.004, N = 8 4.481 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.9576 1.9152 2.8728 3.8304 4.788 SE +/- 0.004, N = 8 4.256 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6557 1.3114 1.9671 2.6228 3.2785 SE +/- 0.020, N = 9 2.914 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.65 1.3 1.95 2.6 3.25 SE +/- 0.027, N = 15 2.889 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
GNU GMP GMPbench Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org GMPbench Score, More Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 4003.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -lm
Fhourstones Complex Connect-4 Solving OpenBenchmarking.org Kpos / sec, More Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 60.41, N = 3 11936.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 45.98, N = 3 13260 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 115.66, N = 3 21873 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 232.44, N = 3 24402 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 65.70, N = 6 23650 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 54.91, N = 7 23188 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 185.46, N = 15 25201 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 164.49, N = 9 30500 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 134.30, N = 10 33391 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 215.36, N = 13 31744 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 268.80, N = 15 34801 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 309.08, N = 8 36919 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 265.16, N = 15 34804 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 125.59, N = 9 25690 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 90.06, N = 9 17612 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 116.64, N = 10 14821 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 151.47, N = 15 11495.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 32.54, N = 6 3538.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 20.87, N = 3 3628.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 20.15, N = 4 4790.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 10.76, N = 7 4773.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 9.91, N = 7 4676.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 9.61, N = 9 4945.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 22.86, N = 10 5277.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 3.14, N = 9 6027.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 24.04, N = 7 4983.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 10.55, N = 8 5068.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 18.75, N = 8 5246.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 20.72, N = 8 5408.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 18.30, N = 9 5341.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 13.86, N = 9 5459.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 13.63, N = 10 5935.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 26.36, N = 9 5882.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 28.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 28.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 72.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 28.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 28.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
FFmpeg Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 125.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 6.46, N = 6 2655.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.92, N = 6 2637.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 164.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 162.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine Text-To-Speech Synthesis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 1.51 Text-To-Speech Synthesis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 40.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lpthread
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.20, N = 5 26.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fvisibility=hidden -lm
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 26.37 MIN: 25.78 / MAX: 27.07
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 27.79 MIN: 27.36 / MAX: 28.37
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 32.38 MIN: 31.95 / MAX: 32.92
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.06 MIN: 24.6 / MAX: 25.67
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.88 MIN: 25.53 / MAX: 26.4
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 28.84 MIN: 28.41 / MAX: 29.36
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 8014.75, N = 15 639819 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
easyWave Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 2400 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 2400 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 510.44 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp
easyWave Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 201.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp
easyWave Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 240 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 240 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.036, N = 5 7.362 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp
DeepSpeech Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.36, N = 3 160.40
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 315.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 368.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 208.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.2.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.62, N = 7 631.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Zxing 1D/2D Barcode Image Processing 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 6.44, N = 8 889
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Spring Boot OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Spring Boot 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 45.56, N = 15 3766
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Kafka OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Kafka 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 47.06, N = 3 6285
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: jMonkeyEngine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: jMonkeyEngine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 13.91, N = 3 6959
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: GraphChi OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: GraphChi 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 77.23, N = 4 6407
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: BioJava Biological Data Framework 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 27.23, N = 3 10587
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradesoap 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 22.43, N = 3 9041
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 218.15, N = 3 21536
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 90.54, N = 3 8022
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 Database Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: H2 Database Engine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 28.85, N = 3 3038
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Engine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 31.47, N = 3 4541
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Lucene Search Index 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 5652
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Tomcat OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Tomcat 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 6.12, N = 4 3124
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: PMD Source Code Analyzer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 21.40, N = 7 2339
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: FOP Print Formatter OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: FOP Print Formatter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.95, N = 7 924
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Batik SVG Toolkit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 15.15, N = 5 1977
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Avrora AVR Simulation Framework 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 44.30, N = 15 6002
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Eclipse OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Eclipse 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 109.78, N = 3 16332
Crypto++ Test: All Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 Test: All Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 1154.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -fno-devirtualize -pthread -pipe
Crypto++ Test: Keyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Keyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 423.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -fno-devirtualize -pthread -pipe
Crypto++ Test: Unkeyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 251.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -fno-devirtualize -pthread -pipe
Crafty Elapsed Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.3M 2.6M 3.9M 5.2M 6.5M SE +/- 17363.11, N = 3 6197092 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lstdc++ -fprofile-use -lm
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 632.46, N = 3 787673.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 266.10 MIN: 76.46 / MAX: 518.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pthread -O3
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 3.78, N = 15 534.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.08, N = 15 6.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 3.46, N = 3 526.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 12.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.54, N = 3 571.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 141.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 4.58, N = 3 629.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 518.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.15, N = 2 607.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 5.52, N = 3 592.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 590.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.37, N = 3 1696.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread
XZ Compression Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 24.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O2
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 19.97, N = 3 2785.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 25.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 16.19, N = 3 2644.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 68.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 31.62, N = 3 2769.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.4 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 511.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.36, N = 15 44.46
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 253.63, N = 3 122894 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 242.28, N = 3 147251 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 24.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 69.01, N = 3 65855.69 MIN: 49266.77 / MAX: 73931.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt
CacheBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 36.81, N = 3 46653.51 MIN: 32464.67 / MAX: 50033.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt
CacheBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 3.69, N = 3 8338.76 MIN: 8289.51 / MAX: 8352.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt
C-Ray Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 36.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.15 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 146.06
Timed Wasmer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 62.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -ldl -lgcc_s -lutil -lrt -lpthread -lm -lc -pie -nodefaultlibs
Timed Node.js Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 435.89
Timed MPlayer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 29.06
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Unix Makefiles OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 605.60
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Ninja OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 496.80
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 293.75
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 6.1 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 44.47
Timed Eigen Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.42, N = 3 134.30
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 2.41, N = 3 640.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 5.16, N = 3 645.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 283.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 283.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 70.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 73.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 110.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: CAST-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 110.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 340.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.19, N = 3 340.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: AES-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 2994.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: AES-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 2955.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Bork File Encrypter File Encryption Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 5 11.04
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 33.43, N = 3 4204.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 41.38, N = 3 6205.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 27.50, N = 3 8245.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 32.60, N = 3 10177.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 47.66, N = 3 11126.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 137.39, N = 3 11126.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 10.55, N = 3 3821.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 12.69, N = 3 5375.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 8.80, N = 3 6874.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 16.35, N = 3 8405.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 68.32, N = 3 10567.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 138.95, N = 3 10729.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 14.27, N = 3 4261.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 29.79, N = 3 6372.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 32.16, N = 3 8500.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 78.32, N = 3 10689.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 19.53, N = 3 12023.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 102.80, N = 3 11465.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -ldl -lrt -lm
BLAKE2 OpenBenchmarking.org Cycles Per Byte, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 1.0238 2.0476 3.0714 4.0952 5.119 SE +/- 0.02, N = 15 4.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lcrypto -lz
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 519098.97, N = 3 61168569
AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.41, N = 4 38.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -O3
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 140M 280M 420M 560M 700M SE +/- 1009642.84, N = 3 669950867
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.35, N = 15 12.46 MIN: 9.73 / MAX: 13.82
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 37.18 / Max: 40
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 34.45 / Max: 38
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 36.25 / Max: 39
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 22 / Avg: 33.18 / Max: 36
Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test OpenBenchmarking.org Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test 2.0 FAIL 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.44 / Max: 30
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.11 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.11 / Max: 33
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.56 / Max: 30
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.13 / Max: 33
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.2 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.55 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.1 / Max: 25
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.33 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.33 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.25 / Max: 32
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.5 / Max: 30
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 39.13 / Max: 41
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 36 / Max: 38
Himeno Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.22 / Max: 34
Himeno Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25 / Max: 26
Helsing Digit Range: 12 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 12 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 0.6091 1.2182 1.8273 2.4364 3.0455 SE +/- 0.054, N = 15 2.707 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.54 / Max: 41
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.46 / Max: 40
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 1.64, N = 15 39.21 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 37.62 / Max: 41
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.42 / Max: 38
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 36.22 / Max: 39
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 24 / Avg: 31.88 / Max: 36
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.53, N = 15 16.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
GNU GMP GMPbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.43 / Max: 34
GNU GMP GMPbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.04 / Max: 28
Fhourstones System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.04 / Max: 32
Fhourstones CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 22.88 / Max: 25
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.55 / Max: 31
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 22.38 / Max: 24
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32.19 / Max: 33
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.25 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.33 / Max: 31
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.63 / Max: 23
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.11 / Max: 34
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.13 / Max: 25
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.29 / Max: 23
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.47 / Max: 33
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.56 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.06 / Max: 29
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 21 / Avg: 21 / Max: 21
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.94 / Max: 35
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.2 / Max: 31
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.94 / Max: 35
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 27.66 / Max: 33
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.07 / Max: 34
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.8 / Max: 33
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 33
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.24 / Max: 30
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.59 / Max: 34
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.88 / Max: 32
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.54 / Max: 33
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.46 / Max: 27
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.94 / Max: 34
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.76 / Max: 32
FFmpeg System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 31.75 / Max: 33
FFmpeg CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.83 / Max: 28
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.29 / Max: 33
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.6 / Max: 28
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.14 / Max: 30
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.07 / Max: 23
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 1.51 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 32.44 / Max: 33
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 1.51 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.4 / Max: 25
FLAC Audio Encoding System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 30.25 / Max: 31
FLAC Audio Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.75 / Max: 23
easyWave System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 36.26 / Max: 37
easyWave CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 32.82 / Max: 36
easyWave System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.55 / Max: 38
easyWave CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better easyWave r34 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 30.52 / Max: 35
DeepSpeech System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.88 / Max: 32
DeepSpeech CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.92 / Max: 25
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 34.4 / Max: 36
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 29.35 / Max: 34
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.86 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24 / Max: 25
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32.29 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 26 / Max: 28
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.69 / Max: 32
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.15 / Max: 29
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.13 / Max: 35
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.88 / Max: 32
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.86 / Max: 31
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.43 / Max: 34
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Apache Xalan XSLT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 61.94, N = 15 2267
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.47 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.95 / Max: 27
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.4 / Max: 33
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.8 / Max: 26
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.58 / Max: 30
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 22.57 / Max: 24
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.3 / Max: 35
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.58 / Max: 26
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.95 / Max: 35
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.68 / Max: 26
Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.79 / Max: 34
Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 20 / Avg: 24.21 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.55 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.15 / Max: 32
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.83 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 21 / Avg: 25 / Max: 30
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.09 / Max: 32
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.17 / Max: 27
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.45 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 25 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 26.73 / Max: 32
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.27 / Max: 31
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.36 / Max: 28
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.18 / Max: 33
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 20 / Avg: 24.91 / Max: 31
Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.39 / Max: 31
Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 20 / Avg: 21.41 / Max: 25
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 33.14 / Max: 34
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.67 / Max: 25
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 31 / Max: 31
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 21 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 31
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.95 / Max: 29
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 21 / Avg: 22 / Max: 23
Build2 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.15 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 37 / Max: 41
Build2 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.15 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 22 / Avg: 31.07 / Max: 39
Timed Wasmer Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.91 / Max: 36
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 22 / Avg: 27.73 / Max: 34
Timed Node.js Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 38.22 / Max: 44
Timed Node.js Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 19.8.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 22 / Avg: 33.37 / Max: 41
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 38.21 / Max: 43
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 26 / Avg: 34.17 / Max: 41
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 39.36 / Max: 44
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 21 / Avg: 33.95 / Max: 42
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 37.33 / Max: 43
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 20 / Avg: 32.1 / Max: 40
Timed Eigen Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.61 / Max: 31
Timed Eigen Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 20 / Avg: 21.57 / Max: 24
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.54 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.31 / Max: 29
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.44 / Max: 28
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32 / Max: 34
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 30
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 32.57 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.43 / Max: 29
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 33 / Avg: 33.4 / Max: 35
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.7 / Max: 31
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.5 / Max: 35
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.75 / Max: 30
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 33.43 / Max: 35
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 24 / Avg: 27 / Max: 31
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.77 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.38 / Max: 28
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.56 / Max: 33
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 28
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 26.29 / Max: 29
System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.46 / Max: 43 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.25 / Max: 29 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.11 / Max: 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.11 / Max: 33 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.88 / Max: 32 Min: 31 / Avg: 38.46 / Max: 44 Min: 29 / Avg: 29 / Max: 29 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.95 / Max: 34 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.67 / Max: 26 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.25 / Max: 32 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.67 / Max: 33 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.36 / Max: 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.72 / Max: 36 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.15 / Max: 37 Min: 29 / Avg: 35.72 / Max: 38 Min: 30 / Avg: 35 / Max: 41 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.46 / Max: 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.63 / Max: 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.74 / Max: 34 Min: 28 / Avg: 28 / Max: 28 Min: 27 / Avg: 28 / Max: 29 Min: 29 / Avg: 35.71 / Max: 41 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.5 / Max: 47 Min: 30 / Avg: 37.62 / Max: 41 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.82 / Max: 33 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.43 / Max: 29 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.88 / Max: 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 28 / Max: 29 Min: 27 / Avg: 34.24 / Max: 41
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #23 8 x 32 GB DDR4-2134MT 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #28 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 21 / Avg: 28.75 / Max: 41 Min: 21 / Avg: 21.5 / Max: 22 Min: 21 / Avg: 26.29 / Max: 32 Min: 21 / Avg: 23.37 / Max: 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.63 / Max: 25 Min: 21 / Avg: 34.14 / Max: 42 Min: 22 / Avg: 22 / Max: 22 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.35 / Max: 31 Min: 18 / Avg: 18.25 / Max: 19 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.82 / Max: 28 Min: 20 / Avg: 24.65 / Max: 32 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.05 / Max: 26 Min: 21 / Avg: 25.47 / Max: 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 28.45 / Max: 34 Min: 21 / Avg: 31.75 / Max: 36 Min: 23 / Avg: 29.35 / Max: 41 Min: 22 / Avg: 24 / Max: 32 Min: 22 / Avg: 25.56 / Max: 33 Min: 20 / Avg: 22.69 / Max: 27 Min: 21 / Avg: 21 / Max: 21 Min: 21 / Avg: 21 / Max: 21 Min: 21 / Avg: 31.41 / Max: 40 Min: 21 / Avg: 33.1 / Max: 45 Min: 21 / Avg: 33.65 / Max: 38 Min: 22 / Avg: 24.05 / Max: 30 Min: 21 / Avg: 21.57 / Max: 22 Min: 21 / Avg: 30.42 / Max: 38 Min: 20 / Avg: 20.89 / Max: 21 Min: 18 / Avg: 27.4 / Max: 39
AOBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.22 / Max: 32
AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 22 / Avg: 23.78 / Max: 25
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5