emr march 2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ testing with a Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS (3B05.TEL4P1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. a: Processor: 2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS (3B05.TEL4P1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 1008GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.0-rc5-phx-patched (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 b: Processor: 2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS (3B05.TEL4P1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 1bce, Memory: 1008GB, Disk: 3201GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC3T2TFS, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel X710 for 10GBASE-T OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.0-rc5-phx-patched (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 14.47 |==================================================================== b . 14.46 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 35.22 |=================================================================== b . 36.01 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 358.16 |=================================================================== b . 352.65 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 589.20 |=================================================================== b . 577.74 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 911.72 |=================================================================== b . 908.49 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 12.95 |================================================================== b . 13.40 |==================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 3.91 |================================================================= b . 4.14 |===================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 1727.27 |================================================================== b . 1728.92 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 2092.21 |================================================================= b . 2108.31 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 118.68 |=================================================================== b . 114.99 |================================================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 39.06 |==================================================================== b . 38.28 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 196.88 |=================================================================== b . 194.73 |================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 63.99 |==================================================================== b . 63.27 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 309.22 |=================================================================== b . 302.23 |================================================================= TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 92.79 |==================================================================== b . 92.10 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 491.23 |=================================================================== b . 489.24 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 147.76 |=================================================================== b . 148.25 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 554.53 |=================================================================== b . 552.43 |=================================================================== TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 images/sec > Higher Is Better a . 154.02 |================================================================== b . 155.85 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 12.60 |==================================================================== b . 12.66 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 22.94 |==================================================================== b . 22.50 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 36.73 |==================================================================== b . 35.29 |================================================================= Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 17.42 |==================================================================== b . 17.54 |==================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 127.00 |================================================ b . 177.77 |=================================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better a . 41.87 |=================================================================== b . 42.35 |==================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Overwrite Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 176533 |=================================================================== b . 175868 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 176723 |=================================================================== b . 176991 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 378034441 |=============================================================== b . 383625077 |================================================================ RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 164280 |=================================================================== b . 164944 |=================================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 11076608 |================================================================= b . 10797502 |=============================================================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better a . 1529756 |================================================================== b . 1530210 |================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.38.2 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better a . 5340792 |================================================================== b . 5248584 |=================================================================