fpgaserver3y 6ch server 3ch_vs_6ch: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6148 @ 3.70GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPW-TF v1.03 (4.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 46GB, Disk: 1024GB INTEL SSDPEKKA010T8, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: HP S2031, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 10GBASE-T OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-112-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x900 3ch_vs_6ch_2: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6148 @ 3.70GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPW-TF v1.03 (4.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 46GB, Disk: 1024GB INTEL SSDPEKKA010T8, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: HP S2031, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 10GBASE-T OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-112-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x900 6ch: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6148 @ 3.70GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPW-TF v1.03 (4.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 94GB, Disk: 1024GB INTEL SSDPEKKA010T8, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: HP S2031, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 10GBASE-T OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-113-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x900 RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 25170.51 |=============================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24938.79 |============================================== 6ch .......... 29091.68 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 24998.06 |============================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24838.85 |============================================== 6ch .......... 29350.79 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 24689.67 |============================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24490.70 |============================================= 6ch .......... 29129.66 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 24988.61 |=============================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24625.52 |============================================== 6ch .......... 28950.66 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 25088.23 |=============================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24846.75 |============================================== 6ch .......... 28890.62 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 25009.65 |============================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24671.09 |============================================== 6ch .......... 29272.80 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 24910.27 |============================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24528.61 |============================================== 6ch .......... 29038.84 |====================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 25050.25 |================================================ 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24647.59 |=============================================== 6ch .......... 28351.96 |====================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 34747.3 |=========================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 35293.7 |============================ 6ch .......... 69774.3 |======================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 29317.8 |============================ 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 29325.5 |============================ 6ch .......... 57952.6 |======================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 33159.0 |============================ 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 33284.7 |============================ 6ch .......... 64839.1 |======================================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 32972.4 |============================ 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 32657.2 |============================ 6ch .......... 64639.3 |======================================================= Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: cos ns < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 65.39 |========================================================= 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 64.28 |======================================================== Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: sin ns < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 55.83 |========================================================= 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 55.87 |========================================================= Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: sqrt ns < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 4.55775 |======================================================= 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 4.56065 |======================================================= Glibc Benchmarks 2.39 Benchmark: pthread_once ns < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 3.90505 |======================================================= 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 3.90480 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 2048.31 |======================================================= 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 2065.70 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 36013.43 |====================================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 36305.39 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 162.87 |======================================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 163.12 |======================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 5572 |========================================================== 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 5558 |========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch ... 10258 |========================================================= 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 10312 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1081.1 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 13781.5 |======================================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 4201.4 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1682.8 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 386.6 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1157.4 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 118.8 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1117.3 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 11.3 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 945.7 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 655.9 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1132.8 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 370.4 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1163.9 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 6.25 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 880.9 |========================================================= John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 27134 |========================================================= dav1d 1.4.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 205.77 |======================================================== dav1d 1.4.2 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 662.60 |======================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 8.52 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 8.82 |========================================================== Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 32.28 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 33.63 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 19.60 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 25.64 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 32.71 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 71.21 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 93.38 |========================================================= Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 115.12 |======================================================== SVT-AV1 2.1 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better x264 2022-02-22 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 2885.78 |======================================================= 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 103586 |======================================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 91557 |========================================================= Stockfish 16.1 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 22916302 |====================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 45785075 |====================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 606.37 |======================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 68.46 |========================================================= C-Ray 2.0 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 0.768 |========================================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 33.17 |========================================================= Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 49.85 |========================================================= oneDNN 3.4 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.4 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.4 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 346.27 |======================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 29.47 |========================================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 85.68 |========================================================= m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 50.95 |========================================================= OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 793.64 |======================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 257.05 |======================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: m7m kH/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 380.30 |======================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: deep kH/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 5158.46 |======================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: skein kH/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 23497 |========================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: sha256t kH/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 47113 |========================================================= OpenSSL 3.3 RSA 4096-bit Performance byte/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 39 |============================================================ Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 2299888.40 |==================================================== Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1683115.29 |==================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 167.71 |======================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 680 |=========================================================== MariaDB mariadb-slap 11.5 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 336 |=========================================================== GIMP 2.10.30 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 25.82 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.30 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 21.92 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.30 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 24.25 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.30 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 28.59 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 111433329.75 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 36099.54 |====================================================== Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1337 |========================================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 32901.01 |====================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1329 |========================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Time To Completion Seconds < Lower Is Better Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 263.17 |======================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 152.53 |======================================================== Geekbench 6.1 Test: Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better Geekbench 6.1 Test: Single Core Score > Higher Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 663243 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: GLM Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 308.49 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SAGA Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Tree Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 52.52 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Lasso Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 497.54 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Glmnet Seconds < Lower Is Better Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Sparsify Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 120.23 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Ward Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 82.86 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 84.58 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Neighbors Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 292.36 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGD Regression Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 133.92 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: SGDOneClassSVM Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 345.11 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Lasso Path Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 288.50 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isolation Forest Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 377.77 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Fast KMeans Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 560.37 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Text Vectorizers Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 86.44 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Hierarchical Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 298.12 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot OMP vs. LARS Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 75.79 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Feature Expansions Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 188.11 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: LocalOutlierFactor Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 144.24 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: TSNE MNIST Dataset Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 375.14 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Isotonic / Logistic Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 1818.43 |======================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Incremental PCA Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 81.56 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Hist Gradient Boosting Seconds < Lower Is Better 3ch_vs_6ch_2 . 166.10 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 1.2.2 Benchmark: Plot Parallel Pairwise Seconds < Lower Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 28905.80 |=============================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 29031.03 |=============================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 11738.7 |================================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 23598.0 |================================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 10026.82 |=============================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 8280.91 |================================================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 6ch . 29.65 |================================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 6ch . 9.441 |================================================================== CacheBench Read Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 7045.67 |================================================================ CacheBench Write Cache MB/s > Higher Is Better 6ch . 26921.98 |===============================================================