b AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores testing with a Supermicro M12SWA-TF v1.01 (2.1a BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. b1: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores @ 3.60GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro M12SWA-TF v1.01 (2.1a BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: S24C650, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia Device 14c0 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 6.5.0-41-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.9, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 12704 |=================================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 13036 |=================================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 10857.6 |================================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 7966.9 |================================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 19839 |=================================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 54284 |=================================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 67357 |=================================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 28787 |=================================================================== Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 98.78 |=================================================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 8.390 |=================================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 96.28 |=================================================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better b1 . 4859.09 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better b1 . 192.59 |================================================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 20.78 |=================================================================== CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm16 Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 1032.16 |================================================================= CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm64_short Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 122.10 |================================================================== Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 13.82 |=================================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 6.4.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 6.662 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2024 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better b1 . 3.718 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better b1 . 22.41 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better b1 . 20.93 |=================================================================== NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better b1 . 2.14639 |================================================================= NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better b1 . 0.59174 |================================================================= ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better b1 . 16.43 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 20.85 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 12.74 |=================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better b1 . 542517533 |=============================================================== FFTE 7.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better b1 . 136157.96 |=============================================================== Kripke 1.2.6 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better b1 . 152474425 |=============================================================== Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2.3 Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 25.73 |=================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better b1 . 11376.70 |================================================================ NWChem 7.0.2 Input: C240 Buckyball Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 3067.4 |================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 34.03 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 61.91 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Large Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 1092.18 |================================================================= OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Large Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 30603.50 |================================================================ OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 22.65 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 96.75 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 163.64 |================================================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 1494.06 |================================================================= Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Gas HII40 Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 11.37 |=================================================================== Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2.02.73.3 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 172.02 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: H4_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 12.16 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: Li2_STO_ae Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 117.96 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: LiH_ae_MSD Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 108.79 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 24.12 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: O_ae_pyscf_UHF Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 172.87 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: FeCO6_b3lyp_gms Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 160.57 |================================================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Large CG Mflops > Higher Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better b1 . 11207.6 |================================================================= miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Medium CG Mflops > Higher Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 1155.44 |================================================================= Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 10.29 |=================================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 46.12 |=================================================================== GPAW 23.6 Input: Carbon Nanotube Seconds < Lower Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better b1 . 330.16 |================================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1 Input: H20-64 Seconds < Lower Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1 Input: H2O-DFT-LS Seconds < Lower Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2023.1 Input: Fayalite-FIST Seconds < Lower Is Better