programmer-benchmark AMD Ryzen 5 5600G testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI (3002 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB on Arch rolling via the Phoronix Test Suite. programmer: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G @ 4.46GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI (3002 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Renoir/Cezanne, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Colorful CN600 512GB + 1024GB Fanxiang S500Pro 1TB + 2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKX-0, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB, Audio: AMD Navi 21/23, Monitor: F27B40Q, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8211/8411 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Arch rolling, Kernel: 6.9.10-arch1-1.1 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 46.3.1, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.13 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 24.1.3-arch1.1.1 (LLVM 18.1.8 DRM 3.57), OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP.dbg (3602.0), Compiler: GCC 14.1.1 20240522 + Clang 18.1.8, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 2560x1440 Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 41.76 |=========================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 787 |============================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 56.69 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 454.0 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 445.4 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 808.2 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 818.3 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 3118.8 |========================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 3156.5 |========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 454.5 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 444.3 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 807.9 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 814.0 |=========================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 3502.1 |========================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 3489.3 |========================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better programmer . 844719 |========================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better programmer . 2258247 |========================================================= ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better programmer . 589.96 |========================================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 55.58 |=========================================================== Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 124.51 |========================================================== Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 77.40 |=========================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 309.82 |========================================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 29.06 |=========================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 100.27 |========================================================== Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 1495.39 |========================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 1301.32 |========================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 1267.60 |========================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 2771.49 |========================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 197.32 |========================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 669.24 |========================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 106.29 |========================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 1441.77 |========================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better programmer . 103.39 |========================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 4.165996 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 1462.6 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 7.44 |============================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 1723.0 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 263.7 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 1600.0 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 922.7 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 1527.8 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 12.8 |============================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 1759.8 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 93.9 |============================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 1724.9 |========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 267.5 |=========================================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 1228.4 |========================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better programmer . 224714833 |======================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 7544.2 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 9169.3 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 5062.5 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 5746.2 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 10194.4 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 11062.6 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 11725.8 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 6130.4 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 6410.6 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 7420.6 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 12802.4 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 7516.1 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 9082.2 |========================================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 10801.9 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 10045.2 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 10779.3 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 11825.4 |========================================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better programmer . 14416.4 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_websockets Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_tcp_ssl Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: async_tree_io Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: gc_collect Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: xml_etree Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better Build2 0.15 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Seconds < Lower Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL