AmpereOne CPUFreq Driver Governor AmpereOne testing for a future article on Phoronix. cppc_cpufreq schedutil: Processor: AmpereOne @ 3.20GHz (192 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro ARS-211M-NR R13SPD v1.02 (T20240726102529 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e208, Memory: 8 x 64GB DDR5-5200MT/s, Disk: 3841GB SAMSUNG MZQL23T8HCLS-00A07 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 + 64GB Flash Drive, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb + 2 x Mellanox MT2892 OS: Debian, Kernel: 6.10.6-arm64 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 14.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 cppc_cpufreq performance: Processor: AmpereOne @ 3.20GHz (192 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro ARS-211M-NR R13SPD v1.02 (T20240726102529 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Device e208, Memory: 8 x 64GB DDR5-5200MT/s, Disk: 3841GB SAMSUNG MZQL23T8HCLS-00A07 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 + 64GB Flash Drive, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Broadcom BCM57414 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb + 2 x Mellanox MT2892 OS: Debian, Kernel: 6.10.6-arm64 (aarch64), Compiler: GCC 14.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Watts cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 137 MAX: 398 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 97 AVG: 155 MAX: 395 FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 5.70 |==================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 12.92 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 1.213 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 1.201 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.073 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.072 |============================================ FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.276 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.275 |============================================= TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 313.65 |================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 851.88 |============================================ FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.276 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.274 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.229 |================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.565 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.056 |====================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.116 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.105 |======================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.208 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.104 |====================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.209 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 126.58 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 129.86 |============================================ FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Upload FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 7.62 |============================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 7.66 |============================================== FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 28.98 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 29.25 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx264 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 29.01 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 29.24 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 22.30 |================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 62.63 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 10.38 |==================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 23.35 |============================================= FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand FPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 10.39 |==================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 23.34 |============================================= TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 2.865 |===================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 6.244 |============================================= x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 16.97 |================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 41.47 |============================================= x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 11.77 |==================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 14.83 |============================================= x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 73.11 |===================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 156.31 |============================================ x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 29.82 |==================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 65.78 |============================================= x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.169 |===================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.354 |============================================= x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.097 |====================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.114 |============================================= x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.658 |======================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 1.300 |============================================= x264 2022-02-22 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.239 |======================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.454 |============================================= ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 5.041 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 5.055 |============================================= ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 1343.30 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 1348.91 |=========================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 46.92 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 46.93 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 436.28 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 436.84 |============================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 4879.12 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 4879.05 |=========================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 45787.16 |========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 45800.62 |========================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 63915.28 |========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 63916.95 |========================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 608.73 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 608.40 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 2.271 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 2.168 |=========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 563.24 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 563.94 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 116.90 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 116.51 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 415.90 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 417.47 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 441.24 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 454.52 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 3.353 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 3.354 |============================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 5.682 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 5.388 |=========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 1.189 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 1.113 |========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 351.96 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 355.85 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 222.52 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 226.82 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 4.279 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 3.996 |========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 4.470 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 4.352 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 3499.11 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 3478.92 |=========================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 665354 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 662211 |============================================ 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 889367 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 892522 |============================================ asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second Per Watt > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 1037278.18 |======================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 1026312.50 |======================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 328446377 |======================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 333431840 |========================================= Java JMH Throughput Ops/s > Higher Is Better Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts > Higher Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 359.94 |================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 481.58 |============================================ TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 Model: Mobilenet Float Microseconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 277749 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 277485 |============================================ TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 Model: Mobilenet Quant Microseconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 59013.9 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 56326.1 |========================================= TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 Model: NASNet Mobile Microseconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 5484823 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 5503677 |=========================================== TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 Model: SqueezeNet Microseconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 444606 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 444686 |============================================ TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 Model: Inception ResNet V2 Microseconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 2655913 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 2663560 |=========================================== TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 Model: Inception V4 Microseconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 2446237 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 2458877 |=========================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 53.84 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 52.46 |============================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 185.75 |============================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 178.75 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 178.47 |============================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 322.87 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 321.86 |============================================ SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 14.36 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 14.59 |============================================= SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Water-layered Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 12.81 |========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 13.60 |============================================= SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Homogeneous Halfspace Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 5.143924935 |====================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 5.219856519 |======================================= SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Mount St. Helens Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 4.403438384 |======================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 4.437049648 |======================================= SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 Model: Tomographic Model Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 4.378312374 |======================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 4.402243177 |======================================= OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike - Mesh Time Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 133.92 |========================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 142.36 |============================================ OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike - Execution Time Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 158.00 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 157.47 |============================================ OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Large Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 8.021 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 8.038 |============================================= RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 84.63 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 72.87 |======================================= GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 66.85 |=========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 69.21 |============================================= GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 8.956 |======================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 9.970 |============================================= GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 40.71 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 41.05 |============================================= GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 135.93 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 134.22 |=========================================== GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 76.79 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 76.66 |============================================= GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 10.64 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 10.53 |============================================= GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 62.94 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 60.72 |=========================================== GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 33.48 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 33.32 |============================================= GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 34.60 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 33.49 |============================================ G'MIC Test: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 200.59 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 197.36 |=========================================== G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 20.70 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 20.72 |============================================= G'MIC Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 85.48 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 84.12 |============================================ Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 14.79 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 13.83 |========================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 443.35 |============================================ cppc_cpufreq performance . 443.28 |============================================ AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 52.46 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 52.59 |============================================= Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 3.099 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 3.081 |============================================= Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500 Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache Spark 3.3 Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 13.32 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 13.45 |============================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 38.41 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 38.30 |============================================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 1.793159 |========================================== cppc_cpufreq performance . 1.791086 |========================================== N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 0.952 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 0.940 |============================================ m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 5.360 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 5.345 |============================================= GNU Octave Benchmark 9.2.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... 11.45 |============================================= cppc_cpufreq performance . 11.42 |============================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 212 MAX: 340 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 219 MAX: 348 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil . MIN: 95 AVG: 276 MAX: 356 Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 178 MAX: 339 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 105 AVG: 181 MAX: 342 Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 147 MAX: 310 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 152 MAX: 314 7-Zip Compression 24.05 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 254 MAX: 357 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 257 MAX: 359 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 104 MAX: 123 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 108 MAX: 126 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 104 MAX: 132 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 98 AVG: 106 MAX: 137 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 105 MAX: 128 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 97 AVG: 106 MAX: 147 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 105 MAX: 123 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 98 AVG: 107 MAX: 147 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 97 MAX: 121 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 111 MAX: 137 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 94 AVG: 101 MAX: 134 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 112 MAX: 142 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 99 MAX: 122 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 98 AVG: 112 MAX: 143 FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 99 MAX: 130 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 99 AVG: 112 MAX: 144 x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 101 MAX: 106 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 117 MAX: 124 x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 121 MAX: 141 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 98 AVG: 130 MAX: 144 x264 2022-02-22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 111 MAX: 122 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 120 MAX: 143 x264 2022-02-22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 125 MAX: 147 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 98 AVG: 145 MAX: 181 SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 225 MAX: 358 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 233 MAX: 368 SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 98 AVG: 234 MAX: 389 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 250 MAX: 390 SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 98 AVG: 192 MAX: 376 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 101 AVG: 205 MAX: 390 SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 98 AVG: 188 MAX: 373 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 101 AVG: 197 MAX: 384 SPECFEM3D 4.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 195 MAX: 386 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 101 AVG: 204 MAX: 391 OpenFOAM 10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 110 MAX: 120 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 105 AVG: 109 MAX: 119 ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 266 MAX: 293 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 105 AVG: 267 MAX: 293 POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 156 MAX: 302 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 106 AVG: 160 MAX: 301 RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 114 MAX: 138 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 97 AVG: 120 MAX: 148 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 109 MAX: 134 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 102 AVG: 110 MAX: 138 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 111 MAX: 139 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 116 MAX: 145 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 108 MAX: 132 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 109 MAX: 140 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 107 MAX: 139 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 107 MAX: 142 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 106 MAX: 134 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 97 AVG: 106 MAX: 139 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 113 MAX: 137 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 114 MAX: 141 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 107 MAX: 135 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 107 MAX: 138 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 108 MAX: 134 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 109 MAX: 139 GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 108 MAX: 131 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 110 MAX: 135 G'MIC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 105 MAX: 127 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 104 MAX: 124 G'MIC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 104 MAX: 117 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 105 MAX: 120 G'MIC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 108 MAX: 119 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 108 MAX: 137 CacheBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 104 MAX: 105 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 104 MAX: 105 CacheBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 105 MAX: 109 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 103 AVG: 105 MAX: 107 CacheBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 105 MAX: 106 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 105 MAX: 105 Sudokut 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 102 MAX: 105 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 105 MAX: 106 Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 372 MAX: 398 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 372 MAX: 395 AOBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 105 MAX: 109 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 105 MAX: 109 asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 317 MAX: 366 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 325 MAX: 364 TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 143 MAX: 149 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 105 AVG: 143 MAX: 148 TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 166 MAX: 192 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 99 AVG: 164 MAX: 182 TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 145 MAX: 148 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 99 AVG: 144 MAX: 148 TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 142 MAX: 147 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 99 AVG: 143 MAX: 148 TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 146 MAX: 150 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 100 AVG: 145 MAX: 149 TensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 146 MAX: 150 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 99 AVG: 145 MAX: 149 Rust Prime Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 115 MAX: 141 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 120 MAX: 141 Hackbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 197 MAX: 241 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 102 AVG: 197 MAX: 241 Gzip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 104 MAX: 108 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 105 MAX: 107 Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 126 MAX: 261 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 97 AVG: 133 MAX: 279 N-Queens 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 143 MAX: 337 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 105 AVG: 151 MAX: 350 m-queens 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 97 AVG: 232 MAX: 355 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 105 AVG: 238 MAX: 355 SciMark 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 96 AVG: 105 MAX: 109 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 104 AVG: 106 MAX: 109 GNU Octave Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil . MIN: 95 AVG: 106 MAX: 129 TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq schedutil ... MIN: 95 AVG: 109 MAX: 116 cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 99 AVG: 136 MAX: 158 GNU Octave Benchmark 9.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better cppc_cpufreq performance . MIN: 98 AVG: 109 MAX: 135