20240909bare ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 testing with a GIGABYTE MP32-AR0-00 v00030003 (F18v SCP: 1.08.20211002 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 22.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07: Processor: ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 @ 3.00GHz (80 Cores), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MP32-AR0-00 v00030003 (F18v SCP: 1.08.20211002 BIOS), Chipset: Ampere Computing LLC Altra PCI Root Complex A, Memory: 256GB, Disk: 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: KVM Monitor, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-119-generic (aarch64), Vulkan: 1.3.255, Compiler: GCC 11.4.0 + Clang 14.0.0-1ubuntu1.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.048 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1037382 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 49.45 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 20235 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.047 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 21419 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.039 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 26021 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2542.77 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 396 |================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.037 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 27210 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 674.33 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 745 |================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.635 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 787668 |=============================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 verify/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 262714.3 |============================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 sign/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3223.3 |=============================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Overwrite Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 381246 |=============================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 404733 |=============================== WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 262.01 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.085 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1173686 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1.197 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 668190 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1.633 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 612558 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.990 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 50521 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 6.548 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 38179 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1.935 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 51678 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 37.40 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 21394 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 20.43 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 24480 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.321 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 778863 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.363 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2755 |================================= RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 6405301 |============================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 44724.5 |============================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 12709.2 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.322 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3104 |================================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 50714261333 |========================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 155490000590 |========================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 57056631460 |========================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 192372379783 |========================= OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 82233936093 |========================== OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 byte/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 17403139183 |========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 166.06 |=============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 70564860.56 |========================== perf-bench 6.9 Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 170050 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.830 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1204917 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1.709 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 58528 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.626 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1279012 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.061 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1623528 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 19.26 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 41561 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 26.18 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 38200 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.811 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 61625 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.364 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1373351 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 5.028 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 49723 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 10.90 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 45873 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.181 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1377669 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.042 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1206932 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1660.09 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 482 |================================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 186.80 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1339 |================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.570 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1402644 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.330 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1513038 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.724 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1381065 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 45.49 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2199 |================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.164 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1524796 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 17.78 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2813 |================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.057 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1746913 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.316 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3171 |================================= PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 0.039 |================================ PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1276224 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Update Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 387197 |=============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Futex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 636678.64 |============================ SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 92.90 |================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 493420 |=============================== Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 101599.30 |============================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 100520.11 |============================ Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 200 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 64652.58 |============================= Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 100 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 49453.15 |============================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 11200.02 |============================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 11265.29 |============================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 618352 |=============================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 616689 |=============================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 670697 |=============================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 29288 |================================ iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 22667 |================================ PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3846 |================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 723343 |=============================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 132019 |=============================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Read Random Write Random Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 594657 |=============================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 395009 |=============================== RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 219736664 |============================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 808133 |=============================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 867417 |=============================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 33948 |================================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 10844.18 |============================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 11222.67 |============================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 11427.32 |============================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 970483 |=============================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 34.29 |================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 33.55 |================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1417593 |============================== perf-bench 6.9 Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 5049 |================================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Zlib Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3025.49 |============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Cloning Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 4230.15 |============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pthread Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 182018.60 |============================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: IO_uring Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 267335.22 |============================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Power Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 10744.11 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 14512.17 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 225.42 |=============================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 33739 |================================ Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 90.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 8240 |================================= Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 75.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 38 |=================================== Schbench 2021-09-09 Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 50.0th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 26 |=================================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Trigonometric Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 20187.39 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Logarithmic Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 21698.70 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 52422.97 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Exponential Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 17288.07 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix 3D Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2603.97 |============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Floating Point Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 5556.94 |============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 14432.95 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 745748.27 |============================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 347693.98 |============================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1052729.26 |=========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Function Call Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 85044.22 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVL Tree Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 184.65 |=============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Bitonic Integer Sort Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 328.34 |=============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: AVX-512 VNNI Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2542563.60 |=========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 169713149.87 |========================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 14740.70 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 403859855.77 |========================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Radix String Sort Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 155.43 |=============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Shuffle Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 43599.84 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mixed Scheduler Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 19147.29 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 180247.89 |============================ Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Hash Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 7898016.06 |=========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1022.74 |============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fused Multiply-Add Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 34147977.74 |========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Jpeg Compression Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 39975.23 |============================= Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Pipe Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 17685341.73 |========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Wide Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1218085.84 |=========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 29827205.12 |========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Fractal Generator Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 218.85 |=============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Mutex Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 20999750.14 |========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Poll Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3890022.87 |=========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2374.97 |============================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 10869975.39 |========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 13389314.79 |========================== Stress-NG 0.17.08 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 57612.20 |============================= perf-bench 6.9 Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 145 |================================== perf-bench 6.9 Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3324925 |============================== iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 35525 |================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1796418 |============================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1925501 |============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 18.12 |================================ perf-bench 6.9 Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 5581173 |============================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 529734 |=============================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2207255 |============================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 16.16 |================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3.054 |================================ iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 38236 |================================ iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 67.1 |================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 6400 |================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 33.6 |================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 3200 |================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1.05 |================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1000 |================================= iPerf 3.14 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 100 |================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 12.28 |================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2049035 |============================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 50.74 |================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1056846 |============================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 805910 |=============================== PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better PostgreSQL 16 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 864506 |=============================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1046752 |============================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 9.411 |================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 11840.30 |============================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 12117.65 |============================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 8.203 |================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1.825 |================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1454317 |============================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2601492 |============================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 23.11 |================================ perf-bench 6.9 Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 15.96 |================================ Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Ethr 1.0 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1804418 |============================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1946885 |============================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2036201 |============================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 104.41 |=============================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 4.943 |================================ OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 43.82 |================================ OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 22.26 |================================ Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 4.921 |================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 11786.71 |============================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 11853.56 |============================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2690564 |============================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 2.667 |================================ perf-bench 6.9 Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 41.68 |================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 1.617 |================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 12045.94 |============================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 . 12107.97 |============================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Apache HTTP Server 2.4.56 Concurrent Requests: 4 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ctx_clock Clocks < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 80 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 80 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 80 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 80 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better