benchmark_20241010_121529

Automated benchmark

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2410141-NE-BENCHMARK71&grr.

benchmark_20241010_121529ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay ServerCompilerFile-SystemScreen Resolutiongraph-clear-linux-ex130sIntel Xeon Gold 5412U @ 3.90GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads)ASRockRack SPC741D8UD-2T/X550/H (2.07.HZ04 BIOS)Intel Device 1bce4 x 32 GB DDR5-4400MT/s Samsung M321R4GA3BB6-CQKVS2 x 3841GB INTEL SSDPF2KX038T1ASPEED2 x Intel X550Clear Linux OS 424106.10.9-1462.native (x86_64)X ServerGCC 14.2.1 20241002 releases/gcc-14.2.0-204-ge69c03971a + Clang 19.1.0 + LLVM 19.1.0ext41920x1200OpenBenchmarking.org- Transparent Huge Pages: always- --build=x86_64-generic-linux --disable-libmpx --disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-multiarch --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-host-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,jit --enable-ld=default --enable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-linux-futex --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --exec-prefix=/usr --includedir=/usr/include --target=x86_64-generic-linux --with-arch=x86-64-v3 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-glibc-version=2.35 --with-gnu-ld --with-isl --with-pic --with-ppl=yes --with-tune=sapphirerapids --with-zstd - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: default) - CPU Microcode: 0x2b0005c0- gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence; BHI: BHI_DIS_S + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

benchmark_20241010_121529tensorflow: GPU - 512 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 256 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 512 - ResNet-50pgbench: 25000 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 25000 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 25000 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 800 - Read Onlytensorflow: GPU - 256 - ResNet-50pgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 800 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 25000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 100 - Read Writetensorflow: CPU - 512 - VGG-16pgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Writetensorflow: GPU - 64 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 512 - GoogLeNetpgbench: 25000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 25000 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 800 - Read Writepgbench: 25000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 25000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 25000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 25000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 25000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 25000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 25000 - 1 - Read Onlytensorflow: GPU - 32 - VGG-16tensorflow: CPU - 256 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 512 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 512 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 256 - GoogLeNetstockfish: Chess Benchmarktensorflow: GPU - 64 - ResNet-50pgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 800 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Writetensorflow: GPU - 16 - VGG-16pgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Writebuild-llvm: Unix Makefilestensorflow: GPU - 256 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 256 - ResNet-50build-llvm: Ninjapgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Onlyapache: 1000apache: 200tensorflow: GPU - 32 - ResNet-50tensorflow: CPU - 512 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 64 - VGG-16pgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Onlytensorflow: GPU - 64 - GoogLeNetfs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadspgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Onlytensorflow: GPU - 16 - ResNet-50pgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 800 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Onlyredis: LPOP - 1000redis: LPUSH - 1000tensorflow: CPU - 512 - AlexNetiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performanceredis: SET - 500redis: SADD - 500tensorflow: CPU - 32 - VGG-16pgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 800 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Writeredis: LPUSH - 50pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Onlytensorflow: CPU - 256 - GoogLeNetpgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1000 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 800 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Writetensorflow: GPU - 64 - AlexNetnumpy: tensorflow: CPU - 64 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 32 - GoogLeNetredis: GET - 500apache: 500apache: 100sysbench: CPUiozone: 4Kb - 4GB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 4GB - Write Performanceramspeed: Scale - Integerredis: GET - 50redis: LPOP - 50tensorflow: CPU - 16 - VGG-16build-linux-kernel: defconfigtensorflow: GPU - 32 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 32 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 16 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 256 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 1 - VGG-16ramspeed: Average - Integerramspeed: Copy - Integerramspeed: Average - Floating Pointramspeed: Triad - Integerramspeed: Add - Integerramspeed: Scale - Floating Pointramspeed: Add - Floating Pointramspeed: Triad - Floating Pointramspeed: Copy - Floating Pointsqlite: 48tensorflow: GPU - 16 - AlexNetiozone: 4Kb - 2GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 2GB - Read Performancefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSynctensorflow: CPU - 64 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 16 - ResNet-50coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Secondredis: SET - 1000redis: LPUSH - 500fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizeredis: SADD - 1000redis: SET - 50stream: Copyredis: SADD - 50redis: GET - 1000redis: LPOP - 500iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performancetensorflow: CPU - 32 - GoogLeNetiozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performancesqlite: 16smallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samplestensorflow: GPU - 1 - ResNet-50tensorflow: CPU - 64 - AlexNetiozone: 64Kb - 4GB - Write Performancefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizetensorflow: CPU - 1 - VGG-16iozone: 1MB - 2GB - Write Performancetensorflow: CPU - 16 - GoogLeNetiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 8GB - Read Performancetensorflow: GPU - 1 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 32 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 1 - ResNet-50iozone: 64Kb - 4GB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 512MB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performancetensorflow: CPU - 16 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 1 - GoogLeNetsysbench: RAM / Memoryiozone: 1MB - 4GB - Read Performancesqlite: 32iozone: 2MB - 4GB - Read Performancetensorflow: CPU - 1 - AlexNetiozone: 64Kb - 2GB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 4GB - Write Performanceiozone: 2MB - 4GB - Write Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 2GB - Write Performancetensorflow: CPU - 1 - GoogLeNetiozone: 1MB - 2GB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 2GB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 2GB - Write Performancesqlite: 8iozone: 64Kb - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 512MB - Write Performanceiozone: 2MB - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 512MB - Write Performanceiozone: 2MB - 512MB - Write Performancestream: Addstream: Triadstream: Scalegraph-clear-linux-ex130s3.523.5210.213.9402543780.335298535.185284563.00427061110.220.260385126.375303715.814430622.6693748127.362.188457481.243402853.4735.410.31032213628.311282660.2102375010.7913160741.8542697007.014356521.3983576016.565301840.094106593.4327.5766.7268.2335.085024872710.000.1503332910.64238960331.869313802.99526711814.522344352.3794203760.2673742551.4063557590.075133120.03913407810.02246344899.0491143654.15612343.36303.817167952.6734749455.93366.0266.75392.2910.0381347724183531.03202554.739.92215.5827.070.769104141534.473076.81.06693847317.492571690.19412867710.42411780569.687.0677076112.856622322.828884011.078927510.589848800.06714974660.03215650060.17856110.024413911963712.932092478.40594.207601.0462.062237932.812527959.7026.1216.770596310.703142356212.041664406.232802280.51515538392.605959800.28717426560.9561045822493301.470.05418513720.4831036320.16461050.1361836242216.390.02494380.61916141770.46317283010.26219080260.13192472911.58486330.05219146764.651107510.154649860.42548.5066.7734.392922268.77188026.98162978.1356718.997401.8262.3641087.124048574.734003312.2925.9064.19357.3462.5034.57574.212.4740209.6443281.7042024.0838912.8341054.3343813.5340409.7640860.1043699.738.28749.8362.597053.723350.5214.0656.05924233.6229562315964.22320278.581593.82608946.002571357.92108423.82784669.082976662.53397145.339234.80204.44641.473.6353.5027.75483.49627.191552.89.981640.20189.169078.818730.2512.70401.7216.418927.5058593751709.2462.177286.231705.774088542290.5226.5417046.718720.725.7318373.1832.228420.031661.901702.51643.27408854255.858636.988188.983072921650.392.3528459.83637.697857.258600.831665.411728.92111824.9112156.1109465.8OpenBenchmarking.org

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7921.5842.3763.1683.96SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.52

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7921.5842.3763.1683.96SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.52

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.02, N = 310.21

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.88651.7732.65953.5464.4325SE +/- 0.064, N = 93.9401. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 4270.48, N = 92543781. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.07540.15080.22620.30160.377SE +/- 0.004, N = 90.3351. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s6001200180024003000SE +/- 32.84, N = 929851. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.44, N = 935.191. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 346.54, N = 9284561. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.67591.35182.02772.70363.3795SE +/- 0.158, N = 63.0041. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 16372.97, N = 62706111. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.22

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.05850.1170.17550.2340.2925SE +/- 0.004, N = 90.2601. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s8001600240032004000SE +/- 60.23, N = 938511. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.34, N = 926.381. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 376.35, N = 9303711. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s1.30822.61643.92465.23286.541SE +/- 0.076, N = 95.8141. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 555.24, N = 9430621. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.60051.2011.80152.4023.0025SE +/- 0.032, N = 42.6691. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 466.58, N = 4374811. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 327.36

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.49230.98461.47691.96922.4615SE +/- 0.025, N = 92.1881. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 502.96, N = 9457481. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.27970.55940.83911.11881.3985SE +/- 0.019, N = 91.2431. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 557.52, N = 9402851. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.78081.56162.34243.12323.904SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.47

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.03, N = 335.41

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.06980.13960.20940.27920.349SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.3101. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 89.00, N = 33221361. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s714212835SE +/- 0.34, N = 328.311. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 335.93, N = 3282661. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.04730.09460.14190.18920.2365SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.2101. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 377.64, N = 32375011. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.1780.3560.5340.7120.89SE +/- 0.003, N = 30.7911. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 1112.06, N = 33160741. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.41720.83441.25161.66882.086SE +/- 0.003, N = 31.8541. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 421.08, N = 32697001. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s246810SE +/- 0.086, N = 37.0141. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 444.43, N = 3356521. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.31460.62920.94381.25841.573SE +/- 0.015, N = 31.3981. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 393.99, N = 3357601. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 316.571. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 89.61, N = 3301841. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.02120.04240.06360.08480.106SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0941. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 37.55, N = 3106591. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.77181.54362.31543.08723.859SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.43

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 327.57

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.06, N = 366.72

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.14, N = 368.23

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.02, N = 335.08

Stockfish

Chess Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 17Chess Benchmarkgraph-clear-linux-ex130s11M22M33M44M55MSE +/- 1627957.42, N = 12502487271. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -pedantic -O3 -funroll-loops -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -mbmi -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512vnni -mavx512dq -mavx512vl -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -flto-partition=one -flto=jobserver

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.00

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.03380.06760.10140.13520.169SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.1501. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 1534.09, N = 33332911. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.14450.2890.43350.5780.7225SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.6421. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 809.24, N = 33896031. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s714212835SE +/- 0.20, N = 331.871. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 197.55, N = 3313801. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.67391.34782.02172.69563.3695SE +/- 0.009, N = 32.9951. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 779.63, N = 32671181. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s48121620SE +/- 0.12, N = 314.521. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 291.66, N = 3344351. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.53531.07061.60592.14122.6765SE +/- 0.017, N = 32.3791. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s90K180K270K360K450KSE +/- 3042.59, N = 34203761. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.06010.12020.18030.24040.3005SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.2671. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 852.98, N = 33742551. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.31640.63280.94921.26561.582SE +/- 0.002, N = 31.4061. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 410.82, N = 33557591. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.01690.03380.05070.06760.0845SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.0751. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 109.77, N = 3133121. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.00880.01760.02640.03520.044SE +/- 0.002, N = 120.0391. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 96197.68, N = 1213407811. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.0050.010.0150.020.025SE +/- 0.000, N = 120.0221. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 598.00, N = 12463441. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s2004006008001000SE +/- 47.42, N = 12899.051. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2004006008001000SE +/- 53.53, N = 1211431. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 19.06, N = 12654.161. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s30060090012001500SE +/- 33.32, N = 1212341. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7561.5122.2683.0243.78SE +/- 0.01, N = 33.36

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s70140210280350SE +/- 12.36, N = 12303.821. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 76.10, N = 1216791. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s1224364860SE +/- 0.38, N = 1252.671. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s10002000300040005000SE +/- 33.83, N = 1247491. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

Timed LLVM Compilation

Build System: Unix Makefiles

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 16.0Build System: Unix Makefilesgraph-clear-linux-ex130s100200300400500SE +/- 1.00, N = 3455.93

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.11, N = 366.02

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.18, N = 366.75

Timed LLVM Compilation

Build System: Ninja

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 16.0Build System: Ninjagraph-clear-linux-ex130s90180270360450SE +/- 0.42, N = 3392.29

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.00860.01720.02580.03440.043SE +/- 0.002, N = 90.0381. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 99957.66, N = 913477241. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.56Concurrent Requests: 1000graph-clear-linux-ex130s40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 1536.96, N = 13183531.031. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 200

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.56Concurrent Requests: 200graph-clear-linux-ex130s40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 1346.81, N = 12202554.731. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.03, N = 39.92

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s50100150200250SE +/- 0.03, N = 3215.58

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 327.07

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.1730.3460.5190.6920.865SE +/- 0.009, N = 40.7691. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 11632.63, N = 410414151. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.06, N = 334.47

FS-Mark

Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsgraph-clear-linux-ex130s7001400210028003500SE +/- 57.79, N = 153076.8

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.23990.47980.71970.95961.1995SE +/- 0.003, N = 31.0661. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 2360.97, N = 39384731. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s48121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 317.491. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 182.29, N = 3571691. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.04370.08740.13110.17480.2185SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.1941. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 2291.97, N = 312867711. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.09540.19080.28620.38160.477SE +/- 0.002, N = 30.4241. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 6895.33, N = 311780561. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.02, N = 39.68

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s246810SE +/- 0.028, N = 37.0671. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s15K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 285.21, N = 3707611. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.10, N = 312.861. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s13K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 464.88, N = 3622321. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.63631.27261.90892.54523.1815SE +/- 0.011, N = 32.8281. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 332.03, N = 3884011. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.24260.48520.72780.97041.213SE +/- 0.015, N = 31.0781. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 1259.48, N = 3927511. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.13250.2650.39750.530.6625SE +/- 0.005, N = 30.5891. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 809.20, N = 3848801. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.01510.03020.04530.06040.0755SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0671. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 8474.72, N = 314974661. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.00720.01440.02160.02880.036SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0321. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 6559.56, N = 315650061. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.04010.08020.12030.16040.2005SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.1781. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s12002400360048006000SE +/- 44.94, N = 356111. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.00540.01080.01620.02160.027SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0241. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 331.48, N = 3413911. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

Redis

Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000graph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 30296.48, N = 151963712.931. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000graph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 58756.22, N = 152092478.401. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s130260390520650SE +/- 6.56, N = 5594.20

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s16003200480064008000SE +/- 44.08, N = 37601.041. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.19, N = 362.061. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Redis

Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500graph-clear-linux-ex130s500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 39673.98, N = 152237932.811. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500graph-clear-linux-ex130s500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 44203.27, N = 152527959.701. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.02, N = 326.12

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 316.771. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s13K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 153.84, N = 3596311. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.15820.31640.47460.63280.791SE +/- 0.002, N = 30.7031. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 3191.59, N = 314235621. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.05, N = 312.041. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 271.57, N = 3664401. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s246810SE +/- 0.033, N = 36.2321. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 427.86, N = 3802281. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.11590.23180.34770.46360.5795SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.5151. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 2616.03, N = 315538391. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.58611.17221.75832.34442.9305SE +/- 0.010, N = 32.6051. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 378.32, N = 3959801. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.06460.12920.19380.25840.323SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.2871. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 7169.37, N = 317426561. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.21510.43020.64530.86041.0755SE +/- 0.004, N = 30.9561. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 483.48, N = 31045821. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

Redis

Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50graph-clear-linux-ex130s500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 45175.95, N = 152493301.471. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.01220.02440.03660.04880.061SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0541. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 10066.85, N = 318513721. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.10870.21740.32610.43480.5435SE +/- 0.003, N = 30.4831. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 735.01, N = 31036321. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.03690.07380.11070.14760.1845SE +/- 0.002, N = 30.1641. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s13002600390052006500SE +/- 74.15, N = 361051. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.03060.06120.09180.12240.153SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.1361. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 8867.65, N = 318362421. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s50100150200250SE +/- 0.19, N = 3216.39

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.00450.0090.01350.0180.0225SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.021. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 439.65, N = 3494381. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.13930.27860.41790.55720.6965SE +/- 0.003, N = 30.6191. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 7959.09, N = 316141771. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.10420.20840.31260.41680.521SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.4631. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 5871.94, N = 317283011. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.0590.1180.1770.2360.295SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.2621. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 9065.21, N = 319080261. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.02930.05860.08790.11720.1465SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.131. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 4176.63, N = 319247291. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.06, N = 311.581. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 43.05, N = 386331. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.01170.02340.03510.04680.0585SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0521. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlygraph-clear-linux-ex130s400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 6777.19, N = 319146761. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s1.04652.0933.13954.1865.2325SE +/- 0.010, N = 34.6511. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 23.06, N = 3107511. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencygraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.03470.06940.10410.13880.1735SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.1541. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

PostgreSQL

Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL 17Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writegraph-clear-linux-ex130s14002800420056007000SE +/- 31.00, N = 364981. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpq -lpgcommon -lpgport -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.57, N = 360.42

Numpy Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterNumpy Benchmarkgraph-clear-linux-ex130s120240360480600SE +/- 0.55, N = 3548.50

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.05, N = 366.77

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.08, N = 334.39

Redis

Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500graph-clear-linux-ex130s600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 56180.08, N = 122922268.771. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.56Concurrent Requests: 500graph-clear-linux-ex130s40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 795.03, N = 3188026.981. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

Apache HTTP Server

Concurrent Requests: 100

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache HTTP Server 2.4.56Concurrent Requests: 100graph-clear-linux-ex130s30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 390.44, N = 3162978.131. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2

Sysbench

Test: CPU

OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20Test: CPUgraph-clear-linux-ex130s12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 2.33, N = 356718.991. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s16003200480064008000SE +/- 63.86, N = 37401.821. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.36, N = 362.361. (CC) gcc options: -O3

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 426.65, N = 541087.121. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

Redis

Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50graph-clear-linux-ex130s900K1800K2700K3600K4500KSE +/- 131034.39, N = 124048574.731. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50graph-clear-linux-ex130s900K1800K2700K3600K4500KSE +/- 82479.35, N = 124003312.291. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 325.90

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

Build: defconfig

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8Build: defconfiggraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.81, N = 364.19

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1326395265SE +/- 0.18, N = 357.34

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.12, N = 362.50

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.23, N = 334.57

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s120240360480600SE +/- 0.60, N = 3574.21

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.55581.11161.66742.22322.779SE +/- 0.02, N = 32.47

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Average - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 163.47, N = 340209.641. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 233.90, N = 343281.701. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 399.77, N = 342024.081. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 300.60, N = 338912.831. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Add - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 64.46, N = 341054.331. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 595.35, N = 343813.531. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 562.34, N = 340409.761. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 274.43, N = 340860.101. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

RAMspeed SMP

Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 322.24, N = 343699.731. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

SQLite

Threads / Copies: 48

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 48graph-clear-linux-ex130s246810SE +/- 0.062, N = 158.2871. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1122334455SE +/- 0.06, N = 349.83

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.47, N = 362.591. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s15003000450060007500SE +/- 36.20, N = 37053.721. (CC) gcc options: -O3

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncgraph-clear-linux-ex130s7001400210028003500SE +/- 18.43, N = 33350.5

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s50100150200250SE +/- 0.02, N = 3214.06

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1326395265SE +/- 0.07, N = 356.05

Coremark

CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Secondgraph-clear-linux-ex130s200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 807.17, N = 3924233.621. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt

Redis

Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000graph-clear-linux-ex130s500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 29494.14, N = 32315964.21. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500graph-clear-linux-ex130s500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 11969.50, N = 32320278.581. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

FS-Mark

Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizegraph-clear-linux-ex130s30060090012001500SE +/- 10.95, N = 31593.8

Redis

Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000graph-clear-linux-ex130s600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 5366.67, N = 32608946.001. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50graph-clear-linux-ex130s600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 7594.08, N = 32571357.921. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Stream

Type: Copy

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Copygraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 156.45, N = 5108423.81. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

Redis

Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50graph-clear-linux-ex130s600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 10370.68, N = 32784669.081. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000graph-clear-linux-ex130s600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 2790.75, N = 32976662.51. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

Redis

Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500graph-clear-linux-ex130s700K1400K2100K2800K3500KSE +/- 40613.33, N = 33397145.331. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 45.17, N = 39234.801. (CC) gcc options: -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s4080120160200SE +/- 0.30, N = 3204.44

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 6.11, N = 3641.471. (CC) gcc options: -O3

SQLite

Threads / Copies: 16

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.81791.63582.45373.27164.0895SE +/- 0.032, N = 153.6351. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

Smallpt

Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSmallpt 1.0Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samplesgraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7881.5762.3643.1523.94SE +/- 0.042, N = 153.5021. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s246810SE +/- 0.04, N = 37.75

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s100200300400500SE +/- 0.81, N = 3483.49

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 6.48, N = 5627.191. (CC) gcc options: -O3

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizegraph-clear-linux-ex130s30060090012001500SE +/- 9.54, N = 31552.8

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 39.98

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 16.01, N = 151640.201. (CC) gcc options: -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s4080120160200SE +/- 0.57, N = 3189.16

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 89.18, N = 39078.811. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 16.74, N = 38730.251. (CC) gcc options: -O3

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.10, N = 312.70

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s90180270360450SE +/- 0.94, N = 3401.72

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s48121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 316.41

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 74.23, N = 38927.511. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 8.84, N = 31709.241. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.32, N = 362.171. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s16003200480064008000SE +/- 82.81, N = 37286.231. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 4.53, N = 31705.771. (CC) gcc options: -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s60120180240300SE +/- 0.52, N = 3290.52

TensorFlow

Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.14, N = 326.54

Sysbench

Test: RAM / Memory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/sec, More Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20Test: RAM / Memorygraph-clear-linux-ex130s4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 64.18, N = 317046.711. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 69.82, N = 38720.721. (CC) gcc options: -O3

SQLite

Threads / Copies: 32

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 32graph-clear-linux-ex130s1.28952.5793.86855.1586.4475SE +/- 0.007, N = 35.7311. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 75.51, N = 38373.181. (CC) gcc options: -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s714212835SE +/- 0.05, N = 332.22

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 112.98, N = 38420.031. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 11.25, N = 31661.901. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 3.45, N = 31702.511. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 1.15, N = 3643.271. (CC) gcc options: -O3

TensorFlow

Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1326395265SE +/- 0.36, N = 355.85

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 43.31, N = 38636.981. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 64.89, N = 38188.981. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 18.68, N = 31650.391. (CC) gcc options: -O3

SQLite

Threads / Copies: 8

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 8graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.52921.05841.58762.11682.646SE +/- 0.021, N = 32.3521. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 92.87, N = 38459.831. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 3.36, N = 3637.691. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 107.77, N = 37857.251. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 13.60, N = 38600.831. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 8.05, N = 31665.411. (CC) gcc options: -O3

IOzone

Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 11.10, N = 31728.921. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Stream

Type: Add

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Addgraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 18.13, N = 5111824.91. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

Stream

Type: Triad

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Triadgraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 23.35, N = 5112156.11. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

Stream

Type: Scale

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Scalegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 31.43, N = 5109465.81. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5