test lxc testing on Debian GNU/Linux 12 via the Phoronix Test Suite. r1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 52 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 52 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - mgag200drmfb - Dell: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 3.30GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP (2.19.0 BIOS), Memory: 98GB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1, Graphics: mgag200drmfb OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12, Kernel: 6.8.12-3-pve (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1600x1200, System Layer: lxc Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 500 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 19.51 |============================================ miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 Billion Interactions/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 20.62 |============================================ Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 702647233 |======================================== SVT-AV1 2.3 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better x264 2022-02-22 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.21 |============================================= AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 5.36 |============================================= AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 31.26 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 12.00 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 29.29 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 31.83 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 32.85 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 32.91 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.65 |============================================= AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11.71 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 65.12 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 31.70 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 66.04 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 69.78 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 71.48 |============================================ AOM AV1 3.9 Encoder Mode: Speed 11 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 71.63 |============================================ miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 487.66 |=========================================== miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 GFInst/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 515.58 |=========================================== Hashcat 6.2.4 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: KawPow - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8243.6 |=========================================== Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8225.4 |=========================================== Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 12688.7 |========================================== Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1582.9 |=========================================== Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Heavy - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8230.4 |=========================================== Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Femto UPX2 - Hash Count: 1M H/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8252.7 |=========================================== Aircrack-ng 1.7 k/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 72471.82 |========================================= Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 474.91 |=========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: x20r kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 5936.61 |========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: scrypt kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 208.91 |=========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 6558.28 |========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2590.17 |========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 124240 |=========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2995.14 |========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 29780 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8846.55 |========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 10883 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 45963 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 24.3 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 64980 |============================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 8361.63 |================================================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 36891.33 |================================================================ CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better r1 . 65744.18 |================================================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1436.4 |=========================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 682.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 521.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 668.3 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 133.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 626.5 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11.3 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 578.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 585.4 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 730.5 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 495.7 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 686.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 6.19 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 592.4 |============================================ Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 3324.24 |========================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Compression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 137422 |=========================================== 7-Zip Compression 24.05 Test: Decompression Rating MIPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 122760 |=========================================== Stockfish 17 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 43261094 |========================================= LeelaChessZero 0.31.1 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 65 |=============================================== LeelaChessZero 0.31.1 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 54 |=============================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 62366573 |========================================= NAMD 3.0 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better NAMD 3.0 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1.09268 |========================================== NAMD 3.0 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.32870 |========================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1268136.64 |======================================= Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2992050.82 |======================================= Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 809259.92 |======================================== Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 3191700.60 |======================================= Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 3195806.54 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1524635.99 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1609507.71 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1361024.38 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1365973.23 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1480526.55 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1303976.38 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1331731.41 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1517459.59 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 10:1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1277786.02 |======================================= Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1481597.00 |======================================= John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 30661 |============================================ nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 20 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2246300.92 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1574262.85 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1769970.88 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2203333.82 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1719230.85 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1403511.36 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1783987.96 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1955391.54 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1390421.08 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1542038.12 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1407706.52 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1785408.10 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1251818.18 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1571264.33 |======================================= Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1236129.42 |======================================= CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 25.6 |============================================= QuantLib 1.35-dev Size: S tasks/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 10.44 |============================================ QuantLib 1.35-dev Size: XXS tasks/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 10.95 |============================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2736.22 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 46814.61 |========================================= Apache Siege 2.4.62 Concurrent Users: 10 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 23642.07 |========================================= Apache Siege 2.4.62 Concurrent Users: 50 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 22369.70 |========================================= Apache Siege 2.4.62 Concurrent Users: 100 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 21617.09 |========================================= Apache Siege 2.4.62 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 20413.98 |========================================= Apache Siege 2.4.62 Concurrent Users: 500 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 20425.82 |========================================= Apache Siege 2.4.62 Concurrent Users: 1000 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 20260.73 |========================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 281287.4 |========================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 938427.0 |========================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 966559.2 |========================================= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1063 |============================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 38.22 |============================================ Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 21.82 |============================================ LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better LevelDB 1.23 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1161 |============================================= Renaissance 0.14 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Renaissance 0.14 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11385.6 |========================================== Renaissance 0.14 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better oneDNN 3.6 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8144 |============================================= DaCapo Benchmark 23.11 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 19157 |============================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 133.48 |=========================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 2024.3 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1491.16 |========================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 78.38 |============================================ C-Ray 2.0 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 0.618 |============================================ POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 23.76 |============================================ Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 32.49 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 57.43 |============================================ m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 36.86 |============================================ Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 141.43 |=========================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 66.19 |============================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11.16 |============================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 13.75 |============================================ Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 1163.96 |========================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 10.65 |============================================ Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 46.69 |============================================ OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bumper Beam Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 143.24 |=========================================== OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Ford Taurus 10M Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M Seconds < Lower Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 75.12 |============================================ OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Bird Strike on Windshield Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 230.48 |=========================================== OpenFOAM 10 Input: motorBike Seconds < Lower Is Better Blender 4.2 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 72.25 |============================================ Blender 4.2 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 99.22 |============================================ Blender 4.2 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 215.31 |=========================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 105.76 |=========================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 736.44 |=========================================== Blender 4.2 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 233.47 |=========================================== Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 76.41 |============================================ Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 2052.80 |========================================== libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 150.33 |=========================================== libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 79.42 |============================================ libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 6.731 |============================================ libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 11.93 |============================================ libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 8.388 |============================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 497.46 |=========================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 . 604.37 |===========================================