c6i-12xlarge-amazon-linux-2023 amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.6.20241111 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (24 Cores), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 c6i.12xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT/s, Disk: 107GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Amazon Linux 2023.6.20241111, Kernel: 6.1.115-126.197.amzn2023.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.4.1 20230605, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 86063.35 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 47977.01 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6665.43 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6875.66 |============================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 72102.54 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 14059.76 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6867.61 |============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1097 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1161 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1024 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1047 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0879 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 24 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1000 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0843 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0917 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1203 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0501 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0803 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0817 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 24 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0802 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0500 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0498 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 24 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0496 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0497 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0498 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0463 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0459 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 24 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0460 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.046 |================================================ pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0460 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.046 |================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 14053.84 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 156274.5 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6891.56 |============================================== Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 10946.97 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 14073.86 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6877.70 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 13348.16 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 7043.64 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 12368.72 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 142528.9 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 141871.2 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 96 GB DDR4-3200MT . 125017.7 |=============================================