c6i-2xlarge-amazon-linux-2023 amazon testing on Amazon Linux 2023.6.20241111 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT: Processor: Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C (4 Cores), Motherboard: Amazon EC2 c6i.2xlarge (1.0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT/s, Disk: 107GB Amazon Elastic Block Store, Network: Amazon Elastic OS: Amazon Linux 2023.6.20241111, Kernel: 6.1.115-126.197.amzn2023.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 11.4.1 20230605, File-System: xfs, System Layer: amazon CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6665.01 |============================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 86066.54 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 47984.53 |============================================= Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 12008.98 |============================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0873 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1086 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0853 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1055 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0831 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.1125 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0499 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0498 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0496 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0461 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.0459 |=============================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 0.046 |================================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 83970.2 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 13080.82 |============================================= Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: RAM / Memory MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6112.15 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6846.52 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 13995.72 |============================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6902.52 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 6920.16 |============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 13059.79 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 52785.3 |============================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 52715.6 |============================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT . 46671.6 |==============================================