tower Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF testing with a Gigabyte Z890M GAMING X (F16c BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB on ManjaroLinux 25.0.0 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF: Processor: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF @ 5.10GHz (20 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z890M GAMING X (F16c BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device ae7f, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2000GB SHPP41-2000GM + 500GB CT500P3SSD8 + Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 2000GB + 500GB CT500BX500SSD1 + 1000GB Samsung SSD 870, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB, Audio: NVIDIA AD104 HD Audio, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE OS: ManjaroLinux 25.0.0, Kernel: 6.13.0-1-MANJARO (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.15, Display Driver: NVIDIA, Compiler: GCC 14.2.1 20240910, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed GCC Compilation 13.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 579.58 |============================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 389.32 |============================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 361.20 |============================================ Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 202.43 |============================================ simdjson 3.10 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 5.79 |============================================== Build2 0.17 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 95.26 |============================================= simdjson 3.10 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 1.76 |============================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 660.67 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 2010.1 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 10.6 |============================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 7.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 33.94 |============================================= simdjson 3.10 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 10.16 |============================================= simdjson 3.10 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 9.90 |============================================== simdjson 3.10 Throughput Test: TopTweet GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 10.18 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 2056.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 19.6 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 2204.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 1607.8 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 2416.5 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 783.3 |============================================= Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 186.03 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 4753.8 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 2476.6 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 12 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 255.2 |============================================= Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 2390.2 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 790.0 |============================================= Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 59.24 |============================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: defconfig Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 59.16 |============================================= Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 42.68 |============================================= Timed Eigen Compilation 3.4.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 8.3.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 40.81 |============================================= Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 33.57 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 593.0 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 599.4 |============================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 1094.4 |============================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 1053.0 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 9674.0 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 9662.3 |============================================ Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 593.4 |============================================= Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 598.4 |============================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 1093.6 |============================================ Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 1049.0 |============================================ Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 11109.6 |=========================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 11088.7 |=========================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 1159931 |=========================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 3036586 |=========================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 34.50 |============================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 31.25 |============================================= Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 534040100 |========================================= Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 22.17 |============================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 12824.8 |=========================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 471 |=============================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 10580.5 |=========================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 21845.3 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 256MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 12685.4 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 13445.2 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 15694.5 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 16493.2 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 128MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 17527.7 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 17942.9 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 19566.9 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz noshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 20562.4 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 64MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 21241.4 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 22058.1 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 22679.4 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz bitshuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 23316.2 |=========================================== Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 14.42 |============================================= C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 32MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 24983.9 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 8MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 25941.5 |=========================================== C-Blosc 2.11 Test: blosclz shuffle - Buffer Size: 16MB MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF . 26313.0 |=========================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Seconds < Lower Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_websockets Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: asyncio_tcp_ssl Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: async_tree_io Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: gc_collect Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: xml_etree Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better PyPerformance 1.11 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better ArrayFire 3.9 Test: BLAS CPU Timed Mesa Compilation 24.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Seconds < Lower Is Better