CUDA Mini-Nbody

The CUDA version of Harrism's mini-nbody tests.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark cuda-mini-nbody.

Project Site

github.com

Test Created

10 November 2015

Last Updated

15 March 2019

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel

Test Type

Graphics

Average Install Time

2 Seconds

Average Run Time

39 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain

Accolades

100k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 2 December 2024.

Revision History

pts/cuda-mini-nbody-1.1.1 [View Source] Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:35:43 GMT
Fix MIB to HIB proportion.

pts/cuda-mini-nbody-1.1.0 [View Source] Fri, 07 Dec 2018 14:52:29 GMT
Update https://github.com/phoronix-test-suite/test-profiles/pull/22

pts/cuda-mini-nbody-1.0.1 [View Source] Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:14:06 GMT
Set /usr/local/cuda/bin in PATH when needed

pts/cuda-mini-nbody-1.0.0 [View Source] Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:41:29 GMT
CUDA mini Nbody

Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10

Test: Original

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 244 public results since 7 December 2018 with the latest data as of 11 November 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component

Percentile Rank

# Compatible Public Results

(NBody^2)/s (Average)

Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

80th

398 ^{+/- 9}

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

77th

308 ^{+/- 1}

Mid-Tier

75th

< 299

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

74th

268 ^{+/- 23}

eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

71st

247 ^{+/- 3}

Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

70th

239 ^{+/- 4}

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

66th

220 ^{+/- 3}

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

63rd

200 ^{+/- 1}

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

56th

112 ^{+/- 13}

Median

50th

NVIDIA Quadro K620

50th

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (CUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10 - Test: Original) has an average run-time of 5 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.4%.

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture

Kernel Identifier

Verified On

Intel / AMD x86 64-bit

x86_64

(Many Processors)

ARMv8 64-bit

aarch64

ARMv8 Cortex-A57 4-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A57 6-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A78E, ARMv8 Cortex-A78E 12-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A78E 6-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A78E 8-Core, ARMv8 rev 0 2-Core, ARMv8 rev 0 4-Core, ARMv8 rev 0 6-Core, ARMv8 rev 0 8-Core, ARMv8 rev 1 2-Core, ARMv8 rev 1 4-Core, ARMv8 rev 3 4-Core

NLA08316781 1 System - 35 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4114 - ASUS WS-C621E-SAGE - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Pop 22.04 - 6.9.3-76060903-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
Jetson Orin Featured Graphics Comparison	Orin - NVIDIA Tegra Orin
Orin-NX Cuda-mini-nbody 1 System - 5 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 3.1-32827747 - 16GB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.104-tegra - NVIDIA
haeglnx8c 6 Systems - 31 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 4.1-33958178 - 8GB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.120-tegra - GNOME Shell 3.36.9
haeglnano4 7 Systems - 29 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 4.1-33958178 - 3584MB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.120-tegra - GNOME Shell 3.36.9
haeglnano4 6 Systems - 21 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 4.1-33958178 - 3584MB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.120-tegra - GNOME Shell 3.36.9
haeglnx8c 5 Systems - 23 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 4.1-33958178 - 8GB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.120-tegra - GNOME Shell 3.36.9
haeglnx8c 4 Systems - 21 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 4.1-33958178 - 8GB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.120-tegra - GNOME Shell 3.36.9
haeglnx8c 3 Systems - 17 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 4.1-33958178 - 8GB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.120-tegra - GNOME Shell 3.36.9
cuda 5 Systems - 6 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - NVIDIA Jetson - 62GB Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.136-tegra - GNOME Shell 42.9
cuda 4 Systems - 5 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - NVIDIA Jetson - 62GB Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.136-tegra - GNOME Shell 42.9
cuda 3 Systems - 5 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - NVIDIA Jetson - 62GB Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.136-tegra - GNOME Shell 42.9
cuda 2 Systems - 5 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - NVIDIA Jetson - 62GB Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.136-tegra - GNOME Shell 42.9
20240614jp6 3 Systems - 17 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - NVIDIA Jetson - 62GB Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.15.136-tegra - GNOME Shell 42.9
uarnuspc 4 Systems - 17 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A78E - EDK II 4.1-33958178 - 16GB Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.10.120-tegra - GNOME Shell 3.36.9

jetson Featured Disk Comparison	ARMv8 rev 0 - Jetson-AGX - 16GB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
Jetson Nano Developer Kit 8 Systems - 76 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 rev 1 - jetson-nano - 4096MB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
NVIDIA AMD Linux GPU Compute December 2018 10 Systems - 59 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-9900K - ASUS PRIME Z390-A - Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.19.5-041905-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3
jetson 2 Systems - 14 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 Cortex-A57 - NVIDIA Jetson Nano Developer Kit - 4096MB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
720_R32_4_4 18 Systems - 36 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 rev 0 - Jetson-AGX - 16GB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
720_R32_4_4 17 Systems - 35 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 rev 0 - Jetson-AGX - 16GB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
720_R32_4_4 16 Systems - 35 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 rev 0 - Jetson-AGX - 16GB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
ODROID-N2 Benchmark Comparison 10 Systems - 77 Benchmark Results	ARMv7 rev 4 - BCM2835 Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Plus Rev 1.3 - 926MB Raspbian 9.6 - 4.19.23-v7+ - LXDE
720_R32_4_4 13 Systems - 35 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 rev 0 - Jetson-AGX - 16GB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
Jetson Nano Developer Kit 9 Systems - 77 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 rev 3 - quill - 8192MB Ubuntu 16.04 - 4.4.38-tegra - Unity 7.4.0
NVIDIA AMD Linux GPU Compute December 2018 11 Systems - 59 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-9900K - ASUS PRIME Z390-A - Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.19.5-041905-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3
GPU test physical - 160.99 1 System - 5 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i7-6850K - ASUS X99-E WS/USB 3.1 - Intel Xeon E7 v4 Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-53-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4
720_R32_4_4 11 Systems - 33 Benchmark Results	ARMv8 rev 0 - Jetson-AGX - 16GB Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.9.140-tegra - Unity 7.5.0
NVIDIA AMD Linux GPU Compute December 2018 12 Systems - 59 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-9900K - EVOC P7xxTM1 powered by premamod - Intel 8th Gen Core 8-core Desktop Ubuntu 18.04 - 5.2.10 - GNOME Shell 3.28.4
AIS-D422-A1 1 System - 5 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon D-2146NT - Supermicro X11SDW-8C-TP13F v1.02 - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.18.0-15-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3