Intel Core i5-6200U testing with a HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS) and Intel HD 520 3072MB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
SAMSUNG MZNLN256 Disk Notes: CFQ / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Intel Core i5-6200U Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 Intel HD 520 Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Intel Connection I219-V Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256, Graphics: Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20724, Network: Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
HPC Challenge HPC Challenge (HPCC) is a cluster-focused benchmark consisting of the HPL Linpack TPP benchmark, DGEMM, STREAM, PTRANS, RandomAccess, FFT, and communication bandwidth and latency. This HPC Challenge test profile attempts to ship with standard yet versatile configuration/input files though they can be modified. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL Intel Core i5-6200U 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte Intel Core i5-6200U 0.7235 1.447 2.1705 2.894 3.6175 SE +/- 0.02260, N = 3 3.21539 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte Intel Core i5-6200U 0.7235 1.447 2.1705 2.894 3.6175 SE +/- 0.02260, N = 3 3.21539 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM Intel Core i5-6200U 1.176 2.352 3.528 4.704 5.88 SE +/- 0.00194, N = 3 5.22681 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans Intel Core i5-6200U 0.0712 0.1424 0.2136 0.2848 0.356 SE +/- 0.00105, N = 3 0.31648 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad Intel Core i5-6200U 1.0622 2.1244 3.1866 4.2488 5.311 SE +/- 0.00198, N = 3 4.72101 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org GUP/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access Intel Core i5-6200U 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 SE +/- 0.00001, N = 3 0.00204 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org usecs, Fewer Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency Intel Core i5-6200U 0.1493 0.2986 0.4479 0.5972 0.7465 SE +/- 0.00226, N = 3 0.66375 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth Intel Core i5-6200U 0.6078 1.2156 1.8234 2.4312 3.039 SE +/- 0.01022, N = 3 2.70117 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth Intel Core i5-6200U 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 118.39, N = 3 7551.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -lblas -lm -pthread -lmpi -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops 2. ATLAS + Open MPI 2.1.1
Interbench Interbench is an interactivity benchmark written by Con Kolivas. Interbench is primarily intended to test out the system kernel and its CPU scheduler while running a simulated test with a given simulated load in the background. Each benchmark / load is run for 60 seconds per test. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 246 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Read Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 3.37, N = 6 48 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: X Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0563 0.1126 0.1689 0.2252 0.2815 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 0.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: X Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Video Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 4.12, N = 6 34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 11.22, N = 6 86 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: X Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.4725 0.945 1.4175 1.89 2.3625 2.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 33.23, N = 6 446 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: X - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 6.41, N = 6 15 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1.0193 2.0386 3.0579 4.0772 5.0965 SE +/- 2.66, N = 6 4.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Read Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.135 0.27 0.405 0.54 0.675 SE +/- 0.31, N = 6 0.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.72, N = 4 48.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Read Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1.3455 2.691 4.0365 5.382 6.7275 SE +/- 3.39, N = 6 5.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Video Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 0.225 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 22.40, N = 6 124.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Burn Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.65, N = 6 100.08 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 24.23, N = 6 122.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 5.79, N = 6 51.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.39, N = 3 127.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.153 0.306 0.459 0.612 0.765 SE +/- 0.18, N = 6 0.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 15.46, N = 6 142.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0855 0.171 0.2565 0.342 0.4275 SE +/- 0.16, N = 6 0.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Compile Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 20.40, N = 6 267.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Max Latency ms, Fewer Is Better Interbench 0.31 Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Memload Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.63 1.26 1.89 2.52 3.15 2.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lrt -lm -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 106.11, N = 3 6254.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 90.73, N = 3 6987.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 63.95, N = 3 3393.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 9.34, N = 3 3677.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 27.58, N = 3 3726.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.11, N = 6 254.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.29, N = 6 264.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 285.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.69, N = 3 255.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 271.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 279.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 15.70, N = 3 6208.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 102.17, N = 4 6527.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 53.00, N = 3 7201.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 52.53, N = 3 4076.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 9.00, N = 3 2801.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.51, N = 4 261.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 278.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 285.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.30, N = 5 233.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.58, N = 3 230.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 202.02, N = 6 4390.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 11.95, N = 6 205.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Java SciMark This test runs the Java version of SciMark 2.0, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This benchmark is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 6.61, N = 4 1708.37
JuliaGPU JuliaGPU is an OpenCL benchmark with this version containing various PTS-specific enhancements. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 435.52, N = 3 2211179.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 402.81, N = 3 2210997.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1960.10, N = 6 155143.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 4598.78, N = 12 256952.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 2184.73, N = 12 95895.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 480.34, N = 12 19533.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1343.95, N = 12 111009.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1062.90, N = 7 83352.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 719.16, N = 7 54373.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 96.88, N = 6 15173.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Simple Blit - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 444.11, N = 12 8912.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 407.97, N = 12 32526.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 50.02, N = 6 11500.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 111.35, N = 12 8503.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 75.87, N = 12 5392.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 472.88, N = 12 45354.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2040.63, N = 7 154396.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Put Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 100.07, N = 12 3346.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 550.99, N = 12 35241.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 275.82, N = 12 17805.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 296.41, N = 12 9935.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1249.93, N = 9 110398.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 983.43, N = 6 82554.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 779.51, N = 12 53410.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 157.48, N = 12 15246.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 220.05, N = 6 17945.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 231.90, N = 7 17662.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Rects Composition - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 294.20, N = 12 5522.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 260.78, N = 6 31971.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 137.16, N = 12 14172.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 156.36, N = 12 8897.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 79.11, N = 12 3209.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 180.90, N = 12 16740.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 244.60, N = 12 10637.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 88.90, N = 12 4036.64 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 129.77, N = 6 16951.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 120.93, N = 12 12015.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 181.35, N = 12 5169.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1088.84, N = 6 205110.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 64.98, N = 12 2216.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 71.29, N = 12 1828.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 48.50, N = 12 2347.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 367.15, N = 6 46869.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 3037.72, N = 12 193198.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 1393.25, N = 12 55114.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 1008.63, N = 12 15423.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32 Intel HD 520 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 595.57, N = 8 49441.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 492.95, N = 12 42486.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 540.94, N = 12 25935.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 203.82, N = 12 8860.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 26356.51, N = 12 69108.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128 Intel HD 520 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 657.34, N = 6 46929.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 256x256 Intel HD 520 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 336.22, N = 12 18621.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 512x512 Intel HD 520 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 191.89, N = 12 9579.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 144.14, N = 12 4985.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better JXRenderMark 1.0.1 Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 1024x1024 Intel HD 520 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 148.35, N = 12 5441.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -lX11 -lXrender
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Intel Core i5-6200U 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 347.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Intel Core i5-6200U 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 213.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.71, N = 3 886.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Intel Core i5-6200U 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 8.92, N = 3 2103.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.63, N = 3 1041.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 15 30 45 60 75 69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 279 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 160 320 480 640 800 749 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 288 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 377 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 145 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression Intel Core i5-6200U 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 735 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lrt -static -lpthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 284.96, N = 3 602012.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL
MandelGPU MandelGPU is an OpenCL benchmark and this test runs with the OpenCL rendering float4 kernel with a maximum of 4096 iterations. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 471.23, N = 3 1650179.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL
OpenBenchmarking.org Samples/sec, More Is Better MandelGPU 1.3pts1 OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 1050.79, N = 3 1650582.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -lglut -lOpenCL -lGL
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 11.81, N = 3 10718.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 287.04, N = 6 10260.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 357.35, N = 6 11004.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 31.94, N = 3 6639.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 10.61, N = 3 6594.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 5.70, N = 3 6504.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 83.48, N = 3 6628.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Get Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 228.09, N = 3 79289.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Set Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 179.96, N = 3 51305.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Append Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 411.03, N = 3 53966.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Delete Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 437.05, N = 3 79660.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Prepend Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 101.50, N = 3 54382.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Replace Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 954.63, N = 3 53288.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -rdynamic
Mencoder This test uses mplayer's mencoder utility and the libavcodec family for testing the system's audio/video encoding performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 AVI To LAVC Intel Core i5-6200U 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -ffast-math -fpie -pie -lrt -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lasound -ldl -lpthread -lsndio -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lbz2 -lmad -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -ltheoradec -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -lxvidcore -rdynamic -lm -lXext -lX11 -lXss -lXv -lvdpau -lXinerama -lXxf86vm -lcaca -lSDL -lGL -lEGL -lpulse -lfaac -lx264 -lmp3lame
Minion Minion is an open-source constraint solver that is designed to be very scalable. This test profile uses Minion's integrated benchmarking problems to solve. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 78.53 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=gnu++11 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 102.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=gnu++11 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Intel Core i5-6200U 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 174.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=gnu++11 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Double Precision Intel HD 520 1.3095 2.619 3.9285 5.238 6.5475 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lstdc++ -lOpenCL -lrt -O2
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better Mixbench 2016-06-06 Benchmark: Single Precision Intel HD 520 0.027 0.054 0.081 0.108 0.135 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lstdc++ -lOpenCL -lrt -O2
MKL-DNN This is a test of the Intel MKL-DNN as the Intel Math Kernel Library for Deep Neural Networks and making use of its built-in benchdnn functionality. The result is the total perf time reported. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 37.42 MIN: 25.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 3.27, N = 3 437.58 MIN: 318.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 23.05 MIN: 16.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 22.19 MIN: 15.66 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 280.78 MIN: 195.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.51, N = 3 279.23 MIN: 191.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 95.42 MIN: 90.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 3.78, N = 3 16768.23 MIN: 16500.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 34.68 MIN: 32.42 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 36.09 MIN: 34.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 2251.09 MIN: 2222.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 12.47, N = 3 13427.87 MIN: 13062.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 17K 34K 51K 68K 85K SE +/- 21.99, N = 3 77617.30 MIN: 77433.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 39.00, N = 3 79532.53 MIN: 79292.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 65.46, N = 3 93554.10 MIN: 92705.4 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 70.16, N = 3 91265.33 MIN: 90323.6 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 931.12 MIN: 893.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 4.00, N = 3 39192.23 MIN: 39142.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 16.19, N = 3 63699.73 MIN: 63667 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 6.45, N = 3 3151.59 MIN: 3030.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 25.75, N = 3 38981.23 MIN: 38894.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 7.34, N = 3 63905.97 MIN: 63869 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 51.73, N = 3 112049 MIN: 111062 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 2.32, N = 3 2891.75 MIN: 2768.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.98, N = 3 1856.49 MIN: 1744.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 Intel Core i5-6200U 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 1609.52 MIN: 1517.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -march=native -mtune=native -fPIC -fopenmp -O3 -pie -lmklml_intel -ldl
NAMD NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms Intel Core i5-6200U 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 10.46
Open FMM Nero2D This is a test of Nero2D, which is a two-dimensional TM/TE solver for Open FMM. Open FMM is a free collection of electromagnetic software for scattering at very large objects. This test profile times how long it takes to solve one of the included 2D examples. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Intel Core i5-6200U 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 241.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lfftw3 -llapack -lf77blas -latlas -lgfortran -lquadmath -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
NGINX Benchmark This is a test of ab, which is the Apache Benchmark program running against nginx. This test profile measures how many requests per second a given system can sustain when carrying out 2,000,000 requests with 500 requests being carried out concurrently. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 31.38, N = 3 22358.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: EP.C Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 127.79 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.A Intel Core i5-6200U 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 9.56, N = 3 3800.46 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.B Intel Core i5-6200U 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 12.19, N = 3 3836.75 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.A Intel Core i5-6200U 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 12.70, N = 3 6925.97 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.C Intel Core i5-6200U 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 2.24, N = 3 5892.73 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: SP.A Intel Core i5-6200U 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 10.42, N = 3 1855.80 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.1.1
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB) is a benchmark for evaluating algorithms for anomaly detection in streaming, real-time applications. It is comprised of over 50 labeled real-world and artificial timeseries data files plus a novel scoring mechanism designed for real-time applications. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 2018-11-09 Time To Completion Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.96, N = 3 961.02
Nuttcp Nuttcp is a network performance measurement tool intended for use by network and system managers. Its most basic usage is to determine the raw TCP (or UDP) network layer throughput by transferring memory buffers from a source system across an interconnecting network to a destination system, either transferring data for a specified time interval, or alternatively transferring a specified number of bytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: 10G+ UDP - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 Intel Connection I219-V 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.88, N = 6 166.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Nuttcp 8.1.4 Test: TCP Transfer - Default - Server Address: 5.20.0.41 Intel Connection I219-V 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.33, N = 6 127.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1 / Avg: 5.52 / Max: 14
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1 / Avg: 7.84 / Max: 16
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 3 / Avg: 20.27 / Max: 46
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1 / Avg: 5 / Max: 13
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test measures the RSA 4096-bit performance of OpenSSL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Intel Core i5-6200U 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 410.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OSBench OSBench is a collection of micro-benchmarks for measuring operating system primitives like time to create threads/processes, launching programs, creating files, and memory allocation. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Files Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 20.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Threads Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.30, N = 4 19.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Launch Programs Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 118.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org us Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Create Processes Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 34.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Event, Fewer Is Better OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 106.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 504.59
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.93, N = 3 503.21
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 501.01
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 499.93
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 495.97
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.87, N = 3 501.96
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 2.94, N = 3 494.32
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 498.74
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 496.10
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 495.22
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 492.47
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 491.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 1.1003 2.2006 3.3009 4.4012 5.5015 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.89
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 490.80
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 489.43
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 489.54
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.21, N = 3 586.84
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.64, N = 3 320.66
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 2.22, N = 3 607.32
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 2.01, N = 3 457.66
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 433.66
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.17, N = 3 367.08
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 452.36
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 387.66
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 428.15
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.66, N = 3 386.32
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 384.45
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 335.16
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 215.04
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 203.27
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 163.83
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768 Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 214.18
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 175.53
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 199.22
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 175.16
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900 Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 175.01
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 345.95
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 341.83
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 334.93
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 335.81
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 335.61
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 152.53
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 151.91
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 150.58
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 150.44
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 150.43
Parboil The Parboil Benchmarks from the IMPACT Research Group at University of Illinois are a set of throughput computing applications for looking at computing architecture and compilers. Parboil test-cases support OpenMP, OpenCL, and CUDA multi-processing environments. However, at this time the test profile is just making use of the OpenMP and OpenCL test workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Intel Core i5-6200U 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 181.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Intel Core i5-6200U 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 23.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 33.54 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Intel Core i5-6200U 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 30.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 312.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 212.08, N = 3 20890.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0158 0.0316 0.0474 0.0632 0.079 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 91.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 181.31, N = 3 38060.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.009 0.018 0.027 0.036 0.045 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.71, N = 3 870.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 198.17, N = 3 51056.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 26.31, N = 3 14427.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 309.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.54, N = 6 148.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.0158 0.0316 0.0474 0.0632 0.079 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 104.05, N = 3 35013.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.009 0.018 0.027 0.036 0.045 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 34.14, N = 6 1189.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
PHPBench PHPBench is a benchmark suite for PHP. It performs a large number of simple tests in order to bench various aspects of the PHP interpreter. PHPBench can be used to compare hardware, operating systems, PHP versions, PHP accelerators and caches, compiler options, etc. The number of iterations used is 1,000,000. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 1088.59, N = 3 445196
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Intel Core i5-6200U 1.2915 2.583 3.8745 5.166 6.4575 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 5.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 23.67, N = 3 4190 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
POV-Ray This is a test of POV-Ray, the Persistence of Vision Raytracer. POV-Ray is used to create 3D graphics using ray-tracing. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Intel Core i5-6200U 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 299.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lIlmImf -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lIexMath -lIlmThread -lpthread -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
PyBench This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.55, N = 3 1521
QGears2 This test runs qgears2, which is a test written by Zack Rusin and is based upon cairogears. This test can see how well different rendering backends perform and uses Qt4. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text Intel HD 520 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.74, N = 3 532.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears Intel HD 520 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 6.62, N = 3 607.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling Intel HD 520 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 8.66, N = 3 2389.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.46, N = 3 293.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 179.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 280.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 186.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling Intel HD 520 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.94, N = 3 1327.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling Intel HD 520 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 5.68, N = 3 1639.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5OpenGL -lQt5Widgets -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames, More Is Better Qmlbench 2 Test: Canvas Text Simple Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50 100 150 200 250 241.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames, More Is Better Qmlbench 2 Test: Creation Delegates Flow Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 60 120 180 240 300 285 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames, More Is Better Qmlbench 2 Test: Moving Images Animations Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 80 160 240 320 400 383.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lQt5Gui -lQt5Core -lGL -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17463.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17512.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 19751.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18553.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 19556.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17485.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 17498.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 19453.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18497.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: SADD Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15129.58, N = 3 1543506.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPUSH Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 33761.61, N = 6 1208131.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: GET Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 79969.77, N = 6 1777741.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 4.0.8 Test: SET Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 38724.55, N = 6 1230756.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -ggdb -rdynamic -lm -ldl -pthread
Rodinia Rodinia is a suite focused upon accelerating compute-intensive applications with accelerators. CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL parallel models are supported by the included applications. This profile utilizes the OpenCL and OpenMP test binaries at the moment. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Intel Core i5-6200U 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 471.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 114.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Intel Core i5-6200U 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 55.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rust Mandelbrot This test profile is of the combined time for the serial and parallel Mandelbrot sets written in Rustlang via willi-kappler/mandel-rust. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 147.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -lutil -ldl -lrt -lpthread -lgcc_s -lc -lm
Schbench This is a benchmark of Schbench, a Linux kernel scheduler benchmark developed by Facebook. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1269.96, N = 6 2503 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 544.13, N = 6 14675 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 518.01, N = 6 38293 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 307.67, N = 3 45803 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 511.37, N = 6 16829 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 758.46, N = 3 41963 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 1517.64, N = 6 56811 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 426.67, N = 3 91605 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 451.54, N = 3 34923 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 677.31, N = 3 54848 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 512.00, N = 3 103552 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2090.67, N = 3 134955 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 628.52, N = 3 39659 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 3429.77, N = 6 82517 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1964.82, N = 6 129941 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4534.89, N = 6 168960 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 517.31, N = 3 55360 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1516.92, N = 3 171093 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 6556.72, N = 6 243584 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 3256.11, N = 3 316587 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 2121.01, N = 6 93653 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1965.75, N = 6 128192 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4011.39, N = 6 169472 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 3019.40, N = 3 150443 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 4463.51, N = 3 328192 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 9630.20, N = 3 552619 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 17612.93, N = 6 703147 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4385.83, N = 6 170069 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 3838.29, N = 6 243456 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5680.92, N = 3 361301 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 4033.52, N = 4 243840 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 2793.93, N = 3 404309 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 11279.50, N = 3 568320 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5701.39, N = 3 354816 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 10240.00, N = 3 541696 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 10965.25, N = 6 701440 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 26524.04, N = 6 715776 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 18039.07, N = 3 1040384 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 27272.51, N = 3 1374208 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 29354.67, N = 6 1313451 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 151774.78, N = 6 2069163 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 147253.59, N = 6 2688341 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread
SciMark This test runs the ANSI C version of SciMark 2.0, which is a benchmark for scientific and numerical computing developed by programmers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This test is made up of Fast Foruier Transform, Jacobi Successive Over-relaxation, Monte Carlo, Sparse Matrix Multiply, and dense LU matrix factorization benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Intel Core i5-6200U 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 420.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 95.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Intel Core i5-6200U 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 120.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Intel Core i5-6200U 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.58, N = 3 498.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Intel Core i5-6200U 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 604.12 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Intel Core i5-6200U 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.99, N = 3 782.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
Smallpt Smallpt is a C++ global illumination renderer written in less than 100 lines of code. Global illumination is done via unbiased Monte Carlo path tracing and there is multi-threading support via the OpenMP library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Intel Core i5-6200U 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 73.70 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong Intel Connection I219-V 1.1318 2.2636 3.3954 4.5272 5.659 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 5.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: --param -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load Intel Connection I219-V 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 1.46, N = 10 13.66 1. (CXX) g++ options: --param -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -lpthread
SQLite This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 122.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lreadline -ltermcap -lz -ldl -lpthread
Stockfish This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 128 CPU cores. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 9 Total Time Intel Core i5-6200U 900K 1800K 2700K 3600K 4500K SE +/- 24622.41, N = 3 4006845 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 2.27, N = 5 17089.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 3.17, N = 5 18598.14 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 3.51, N = 5 18622.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Bsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.91, N = 3 864.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Forking Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 92.99, N = 3 16327.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Hsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 8.63, N = 3 8737.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Lsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Tsearch Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 26.03 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: CPU Stress Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 667.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Semaphores Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 11848.64, N = 3 3491645.24 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Matrix Math Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 44.88, N = 3 10584.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Vector Math Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 1.70, N = 3 3568.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Memory Copying Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.70, N = 3 977.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Socket Activity Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.54, N = 3 1076.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Context Switching Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 634.60, N = 3 654248.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc C String Functions Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1137.66, N = 3 118156.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 24.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: System V Message Passing Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 53535.70, N = 6 1314503.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
SVT-AV1 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-AV1 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.5 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Intel Core i5-6200U 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 6.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pie -lpthread -lm
SVT-HEVC This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-HEVC CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the HEVC / H.265 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Intel Core i5-6200U 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 33.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -march=native -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
SVT-VP9 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-VP9 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the VP9 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 2019-02-17 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Intel Core i5-6200U 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 8.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -mavx -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second, More Is Better Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 3101.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -funroll-loops -ggdb3 -march=core2 -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm
SuperTuxKart This is a test of SuperTuxKart, an open-source racing game. The engine, Antarctica, is a highly modified version of Irrlicht and uses OpenGL 3.1+. Bullet is used for physics. Sound is provided by OpenAL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.80, N = 5 183.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 138.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 181.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 137.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.84, N = 3 176.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 136.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.08, N = 3 174.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.02, N = 3 132.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.72, N = 3 170.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 131.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.13, N = 3 168.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.34, N = 3 129.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.87, N = 3 163.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.05, N = 3 125.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 162.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 123.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.92, N = 3 92.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 91.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 92.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 90.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 90.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 90.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 89.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 89.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 361.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.02, N = 3 352.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 340.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.87, N = 3 334.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.61, N = 3 325.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.78, N = 3 314.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.09, N = 6 297.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.44, N = 3 287.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 176.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 134.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 175.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 131.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 171.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.12, N = 3 130.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 168.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.17, N = 3 128.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 164.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.09, N = 3 126.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 161.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 124.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 157.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 123.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.12, N = 3 156.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 122.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 71.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 71.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 69.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 68.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 69.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 69.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 69.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 67.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.01, N = 3 321.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.14, N = 3 313.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.32, N = 3 309.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 294.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.05, N = 3 287.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.05, N = 3 277.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.63, N = 3 279.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.74, N = 3 264.71
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.23, N = 5 15.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.23, N = 5 15.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 15.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 15.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 15.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 15.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 15.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 15.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 22.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 22.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 22.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 21.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 18.71
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 17.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 17.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 18.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 18.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 19.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 19.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 19.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 19.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 19.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 19.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 19.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 15.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 15.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 163.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 129.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 162.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 128.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 158.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 125.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 156.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 122.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.04, N = 3 152.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 120.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.44, N = 3 149.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 120.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.11, N = 3 148.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.09, N = 3 117.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 145.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 115.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 55.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 55.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 54.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 54.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 54.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 54.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 53.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 53.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.17, N = 3 286.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 277.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.95, N = 3 270.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.27, N = 3 261.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 4.84, N = 3 260.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.49, N = 3 249.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.07, N = 3 247.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.07, N = 3 235.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 156.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 125.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 155.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.76, N = 3 123.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 151.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 121.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 151.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 119.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.57, N = 3 145.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 116.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 146.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 115.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 142.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 114.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 140.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.51, N = 3 113.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 46.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 46.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 46.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 46.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 45.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 45.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 45.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 45.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.35, N = 3 262.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.54, N = 3 258.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.60, N = 3 251.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.62, N = 3 241.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.51, N = 3 232.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.10, N = 3 232.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.29, N = 3 227.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.49, N = 3 217.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 159.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 127.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 159.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 126.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 157.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 125.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 153.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 123.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 149.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 121.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.16, N = 3 148.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 120.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.51, N = 3 146.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.09, N = 3 116.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.38, N = 3 145.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 116.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 54.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 53.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 53.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 53.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 53.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 52.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 52.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 52.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.79, N = 3 279.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 273.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.29, N = 3 267.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 3.14, N = 3 252.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.13, N = 3 249.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.87, N = 3 238.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.35, N = 3 237.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 228.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 13.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 13.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 14.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 13.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 14.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 13.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 13.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 13.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 13.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 14.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 13.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 17.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 17.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 17.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 16.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 18.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 17.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 18.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 17.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 18.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 17.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 17.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 17.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 18.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 17.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 17.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 14.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 14.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 14.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 14.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.83, N = 3 152.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 124.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.77, N = 3 152.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 121.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 148.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 119.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.24, N = 3 144.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 118.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 145.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 117.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.11, N = 3 142.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 116.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 140.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 114.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 138.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 111.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 45.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 45.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 45.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 44.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 44.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 44.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 44.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 43.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.18, N = 3 259.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.02, N = 3 250.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 245.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.57, N = 3 232.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.29, N = 3 227.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 222.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.88, N = 3 223.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.21, N = 3 215.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 156.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 124.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.75, N = 3 154.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 122.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 151.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 122.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 148.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.21, N = 3 118.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 146.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 117.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 145.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 115.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 142.23
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 115.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.83, N = 3 140.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 113.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 49.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 48.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 48.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 48.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 48.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 48.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 47.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 47.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 269.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.29, N = 3 261.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.89, N = 3 252.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.28, N = 3 244.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.52, N = 3 236.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.99, N = 3 229.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.66, N = 3 224.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.26, N = 3 223.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 150.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 122.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 146.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 121.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 145.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 120.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.42, N = 3 145.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 117.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.50, N = 3 142.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.74, N = 3 116.71
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 139.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.72, N = 3 113.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.89, N = 3 138.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 112.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 136.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 111.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 44.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 44.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 43.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 43.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 43.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 43.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 44.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 43.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.41, N = 3 259.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.07, N = 3 250.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.09, N = 3 245.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.15, N = 3 237.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.07, N = 3 228.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.25, N = 3 226.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.01, N = 3 217.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.51, N = 3 212.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 16.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 15.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 15.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 15.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 15.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 14.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 22.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.23
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 22.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 22.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 18.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 18.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 17.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 19.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 19.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 19.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 19.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 19.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.71
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 150.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 123.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 149.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.02, N = 3 121.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.51, N = 3 148.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 119.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.90, N = 3 143.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.71, N = 3 117.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 142.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 114.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.09, N = 3 141.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 115.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 135.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.82, N = 3 112.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 135.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 110.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 44.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 44.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 43.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 44.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 43.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 43.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 44.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 43.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 257.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 252.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.27, N = 3 243.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.11, N = 3 234.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.89, N = 3 232.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.94, N = 3 226.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.36, N = 3 219.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.47, N = 4 213.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 15.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 15.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 15.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 15.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 15.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 15.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 15.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 22.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 22.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 18.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 18.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 18.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 17.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 17.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 18.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 19.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 19.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 19.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 19.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 19.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 19.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 19.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 15.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 15.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 15.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 15.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 15.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 15.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 14.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 22.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 22.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 22.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 22.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 22.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 18.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 18.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 17.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 18.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Hacienda Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 18.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Old Mine Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 18.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 19.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 19.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 15.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 41.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 40.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 40.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 40.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 40.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 39.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 40.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 39.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 41.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 42.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 41.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 42.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 41.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 42.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 41.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 41.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 40.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 42.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 40.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 42.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 40.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 41.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 40.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 42.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 34.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 34.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 34.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 33.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 34.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 33.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 33.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 33.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 46.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 45.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 45.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 45.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 45.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 45.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 45.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 45.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 27.71
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 21.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 27.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 21.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 27.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 21.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 27.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 21.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 27.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 20.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 27.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 21.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 27.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 21.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 27.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 21.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 35.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 35.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 35.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 35.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 34.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 34.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 34.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 34.23
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 36.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 36.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 36.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 37.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 36.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 36.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 35.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 37.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 35.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 36.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 35.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 36.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 35.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 36.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 35.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 36.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 29.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 29.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 29.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 29.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 29.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 29.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 28.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 28.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 39.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 39.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 39.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 39.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 39.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 39.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 39.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 39.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 24.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 18.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 23.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 18.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 24.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 18.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 23.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 18.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 23.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 18.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 23.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 18.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 23.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 18.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 23.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 18.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 28.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 28.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 28.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 28.28
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 28.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 28.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 28.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 28.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 30.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 30.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 29.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 30.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 29.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 30.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 29.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 30.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 29.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 30.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 29.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 29.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 29.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 29.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 29.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 30.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 24.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 24.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 24.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 24.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 24.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 23.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 23.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 23.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 32.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 32.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 31.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 31.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 31.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 31.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 31.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 31.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 16.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 16.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.28
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 16.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 20.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 20.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 16.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 19.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 16.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 20.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 16.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 150.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 122.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.91, N = 3 148.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 120.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 147.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 119.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.43, N = 3 145.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 118.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.96, N = 3 141.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 115.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 140.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.17, N = 3 113.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.79, N = 3 137.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.82, N = 3 112.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.38, N = 3 135.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 111.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 44.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 44.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 44.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 43.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 43.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 43.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 43.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 43.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.51, N = 3 257.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.17, N = 3 250.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.16, N = 3 244.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.02, N = 3 236.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 229.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.99, N = 3 221.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.17, N = 3 223.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.07, N = 3 215.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 23.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 23.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 23.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 23.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 22.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 22.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 22.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 22.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 24.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 24.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 24.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 24.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 24.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 24.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 24.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 24.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 24.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 24.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 24.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 24.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 24.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 24.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 24.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 24.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 26.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 26.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 25.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 25.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 14.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 13.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 16.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 13.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 13.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 13.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 13.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 13.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 16.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 13.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.71
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 19.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 20.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 20.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 20.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 20.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 20.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 19.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 20.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 20.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 21.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 21.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 21.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 21.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 21.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 21.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 14.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 11.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 12.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 12.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 12.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 14.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 11.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 11.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 11.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 11.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 22.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 22.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 22.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 24.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 24.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 23.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 23.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 23.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 23.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 23.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 23.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 23.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 23.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 23.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 24.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 23.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 23.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 23.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 23.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 18.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 18.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 25.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 25.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 25.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 25.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 25.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 25.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 25.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 25.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 16.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 13.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 13.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 13.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 13.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 13.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 16.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 13.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 16.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 13.60
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 13.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 150.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 123.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 148.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 121.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 147.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 119.28
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.82, N = 3 145.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 117.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 142.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 115.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 141.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 114.95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.27, N = 3 134.70
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 113.91
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.07, N = 3 134.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 112.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 44.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 44.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 44.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 43.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 43.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 43.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 43.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 43.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 254.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 253.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.47, N = 3 242.12
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.85, N = 3 235.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.22, N = 3 228.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.22, N = 3 227.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.04, N = 3 224.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.82, N = 3 215.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.63
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 19.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 19.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 21.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 20.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 20.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 20.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 20.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 20.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 20.78
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 20.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 20.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 20.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 20.40
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 16.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.04
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 22.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 21.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 21.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 21.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 21.71
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 12.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 14.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 12.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 12.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 14.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 12.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 14.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 12.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 12.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 12.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 12.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 20.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 20.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 20.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 20.52
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 20.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 22.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 22.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 22.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 21.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 21.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 21.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 22.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 22.28
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 21.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 21.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 21.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 21.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 22.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 21.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 21.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 17.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 17.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 17.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 17.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 23.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 23.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 23.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 23.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 23.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 23.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 23.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 23.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.28
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 12.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 12.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 15.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 12.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 12.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 15.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 12.68
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 12.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 15.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 12.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 15.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 12.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 19.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 19.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 19.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 18.88
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 18.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 20.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 20.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 20.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 20.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 20.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 20.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 20.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 19.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 20.34
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 20.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 20.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 20.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 20.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 19.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.26
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 19.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 16.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 16.16
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 16.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 16.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Zen Garden Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 16.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 1 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 21.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 2 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 21.50
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 3 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 21.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 4 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 21.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 5 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 6 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 21.28
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 7 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 21.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Medium - Karts: 8 - Scene: STK Enterprise Intel HD 520 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 21.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 12.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 14.20
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 12.06
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.15
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 11.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 14.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 12.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 11.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 14.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 11.98
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 7 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 11.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 14.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Windowed - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 8 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 11.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 151.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 1 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 123.35
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.44, N = 3 151.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 120.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 145.41
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 3 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 119.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.38, N = 3 144.17
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 116.93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.42, N = 3 140.47
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 5 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 116.59
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Basic - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.91, N = 3 139.81
t-test1 This is a test of t-test1 for basic memory allocator benchmarks. Note this test profile is currently very basic and the overall time does include the warmup time of the custom t-test1 compilation. Improvements welcome. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 29.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 46.41, N = 3 25637.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm
TTSIOD 3D Renderer A portable GPL 3D software renderer that supports OpenMP and Intel Threading Building Blocks with many different rendering modes. This version does not use OpenGL but is entirely CPU/software based. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping Intel Core i5-6200U 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 84.98 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: D3D11 Intel HD 520 0.4883 0.9766 1.4649 1.9532 2.4415 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 2.17 MAX: 2.7
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL Intel HD 520 1.0733 2.1466 3.2199 4.2932 5.3665 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.77 MAX: 6.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: D3D11 Intel HD 520 0.4883 0.9766 1.4649 1.9532 2.4415 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 2.17 MAX: 2.6
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGL Intel HD 520 0.5018 1.0036 1.5054 2.0072 2.509 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 2.23 MAX: 2.8
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL Intel HD 520 0.9833 1.9666 2.9499 3.9332 4.9165 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.37 MAX: 5.6
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: D3D11 Intel HD 520 1.2375 2.475 3.7125 4.95 6.1875 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.50 MAX: 7.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGL Intel HD 520 0.4275 0.855 1.2825 1.71 2.1375 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.90 MAX: 2.1
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL Intel HD 520 1.2375 2.475 3.7125 4.95 6.1875 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.50 MAX: 7.3
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 Intel HD 520 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 28.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 1 / Avg: 2.64 / Max: 46
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 2.7 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 2.93 / Max: 48
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.17 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.37 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.17 / Max: 46
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.46 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.33 / Max: 48
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.53 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 2 / Avg: 3.73 / Max: 48
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.51 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.73 / Max: 48
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 3.97 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 1 / Avg: 4.08 / Max: 47
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better Urban Terror 4.3.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Intel HD 520 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 2 / Avg: 4.39 / Max: 47
ViennaCL ViennaCL is an open-source linear algebra library written in C++ and with support for OpenCL and OpenMP. This test profile uses ViennaCL OpenCL support and runs the included computational benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better ViennaCL 1.4.2 OpenCL LU Factorization Intel HD 520 1.0305 2.061 3.0915 4.122 5.1525 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 4.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic -lOpenCL
x264 This is a simple test of the x264 encoder run on the CPU (OpenCL support disabled) with a sample video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Intel Core i5-6200U 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 16.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lavformat -lavcodec -lavutil -lswscale -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles benchmark with various sample files. GPU computing is supported. This system/blender test profile makes use of the system-supplied Blender. Use pts/blender if wishing to stick to a fixed version of Blender. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 1437.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.01, N = 3 1441.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 1439.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 2051.76
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 136.06 MIN: 92 / MAX: 234
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 136.57 MIN: 89 / MAX: 237
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 135.71 MIN: 90 / MAX: 236
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 135.81 MIN: 88 / MAX: 231
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 135.92 MIN: 97 / MAX: 235
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 135.73 MIN: 87 / MAX: 232
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 135.47 MIN: 93 / MAX: 235
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 135.94 MIN: 95 / MAX: 237
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 135.99 MIN: 94 / MAX: 233
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 80.44 MIN: 39 / MAX: 127
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 80.77 MIN: 55 / MAX: 127
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 80.70 MIN: 53 / MAX: 127
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 135.98 MIN: 90 / MAX: 233
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 81.04 MIN: 56 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 80.83 MIN: 53 / MAX: 125
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 80.95 MIN: 56 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 135.65 MIN: 87 / MAX: 231
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 81.04 MIN: 54 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 80.78 MIN: 55 / MAX: 127
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 80.77 MIN: 55 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 135.80 MIN: 89 / MAX: 233
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 80.65 MIN: 55 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 135.85 MIN: 95 / MAX: 233
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Intel HD 520 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 136.01 MIN: 95 / MAX: 236
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 68.42 MIN: 27 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 69.19 MIN: 41 / MAX: 114
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 69.23 MIN: 41 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 80.55 MIN: 55 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 69.23 MIN: 42 / MAX: 114
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 69.03 MIN: 41 / MAX: 112
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 69.03 MIN: 41 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 80.62 MIN: 55 / MAX: 127
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 69.24 MIN: 42 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 69.15 MIN: 41 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 69.02 MIN: 41 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 80.81 MIN: 55 / MAX: 127
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 69.18 MIN: 41 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 80.53 MIN: 51 / MAX: 127
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Intel HD 520 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 80.58 MIN: 55 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 69.16 MIN: 41 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 69.17 MIN: 41 / MAX: 114
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 69.19 MIN: 41 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 69.21 MIN: 42 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Intel HD 520 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 69.11 MIN: 42 / MAX: 113
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 54.08 MIN: 23 / MAX: 93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 576 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 54.25 MIN: 22 / MAX: 93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 54.27 MIN: 22 / MAX: 97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 800 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 54.36 MIN: 23 / MAX: 97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 960 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 54.29 MIN: 22 / MAX: 93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1368 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 54.35 MIN: 22 / MAX: 95
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 54.35 MIN: 23 / MAX: 93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 810 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 54.34 MIN: 23 / MAX: 96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1440 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 54.30 MIN: 23 / MAX: 97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 900 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 54.30 MIN: 23 / MAX: 93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 54.27 MIN: 22 / MAX: 96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1400 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 54.18 MIN: 22 / MAX: 93
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1600 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 54.28 MIN: 22 / MAX: 97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1680 x 1050 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 54.38 MIN: 22 / MAX: 94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Intel HD 520 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 54.33 MIN: 22 / MAX: 97
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles benchmark with various sample files. GPU computing is supported. This system/blender test profile makes use of the system-supplied Blender. Use pts/blender if wishing to stick to a fixed version of Blender. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.05, N = 3 2052.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.79 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 2053.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Second, More Is Better Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 1318.21, N = 3 610826
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 39.66
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 39.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 29.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 29.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.1373 0.2746 0.4119 0.5492 0.6865 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 23.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 0.1373 0.2746 0.4119 0.5492 0.6865 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 23.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.8.22 Test: auto-levels Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 25.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.8.22 Test: unsharp-mask Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 51.42
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 106.96, N = 6 7000.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 107.29, N = 3 6704.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 59.80, N = 3 3380.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 45.54, N = 3 3507.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 33.81, N = 3 3633.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.11, N = 3 166.21 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 10.18, N = 6 151.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.08, N = 3 179.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 10.81, N = 6 137.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.94, N = 6 122.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 6.49, N = 6 162.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 97.62, N = 3 5115.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 70.40, N = 3 5907.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 20.46, N = 3 6934.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 7.58, N = 3 3640.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 22.96, N = 3 2447.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.45, N = 6 135.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.41, N = 6 142.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 11.37, N = 6 183.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 6.45, N = 6 123.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.64, N = 6 109.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 13.65, N = 3 4007.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.90, N = 6 109.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Geometric Mean, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 4.26, N = 3 20275 1. firefox 68.0
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Firefox Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 135 1. firefox 68.0
OpenBenchmarking.org Overall Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Firefox Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.66, N = 3 291.17 1. firefox 68.0
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 36.27, N = 3 8088 1. firefox 68.0
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 2.47, N = 6 35.91 1. firefox 68.0
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 45.53 1. firefox 68.0
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 46.01 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org Geometric Mean, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 34.26, N = 3 22852 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 125 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org Overall Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 6.90, N = 6 382.57 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 61.61, N = 3 9534 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 7.84, N = 6 240.15 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 63.65 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 56.62 1. chrome 75.0.3770.142
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 207
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 28.73
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 42.41, N = 6 232.90
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 2.09, N = 6 48.32
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.85, N = 3 391
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 3.77, N = 6 38.68
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 30.21, N = 6 385
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 3.39, N = 6 54.78
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 7.67, N = 3 407
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 85.33
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 40.20, N = 6 325
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.82, N = 6 153
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 6.94, N = 6 153
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 1.09, N = 6 22.10
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 6.91, N = 6 251
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.99, N = 6 34.75
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 9.03, N = 6 289
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 71.02, N = 3 6263
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 113.28, N = 6 5940
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.53, N = 6 24.30
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 78.55, N = 3 5057
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 51.38, N = 6 90.18
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K 44400
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 74.02, N = 6 5005
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 113
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 119
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 75.93
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 120.19, N = 3 19433
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 121
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 88.40
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 166.67, N = 3 11333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.79, N = 6 121
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 113
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 518
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 135
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 18.12, N = 6 114.58
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 51.60
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 4.33, N = 3 446
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 6.71, N = 6 52.82
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 29.49, N = 6 373
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 5.39, N = 6 71.80
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 47.14, N = 6 349
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 152.88, N = 6 1018
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 9813.15, N = 6 65000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 125.34, N = 6 5230
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 118.64, N = 6 2648
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 3796.37, N = 6 84767
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 71.81, N = 3 5173
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 90.25, N = 3 4872
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1449.52, N = 3 77933
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 31.87, N = 3 5315
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 99.46, N = 4 6179
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 90.46, N = 4 6083
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.63, N = 6 26.35
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 31.54, N = 3 5576
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 49.52, N = 6 102.38
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 15600.00, N = 2 28500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 28.11, N = 3 4954
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 104
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 114
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.93, N = 4 113
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 124
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 107
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 142
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 132
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 134
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 73.93
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 251.66, N = 3 18900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 128
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.98, N = 6 85.90
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 282.13, N = 5 11040
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 130
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 198.65, N = 6 3807
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 16.15, N = 3 3670
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 4.06, N = 3 1520
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K 389000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 47.72, N = 3 3499
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 21.31, N = 3 2271
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 2962.73, N = 3 290667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.60, N = 3 3505
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 523
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 19.21, N = 6 105.50
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 155
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 54.50, N = 3 6211
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 450.92, N = 3 49700
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 96.77, N = 4 5626
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 57.76, N = 3 6287
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 233.33, N = 3 25167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 47.21, N = 3 6529
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 88.19, N = 3 13067
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 361.35, N = 6 2019
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 23165.56, N = 6 129283
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 80.71, N = 3 5401
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 33.60, N = 3 3501
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1000.00, N = 3 112000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 32.97, N = 3 5429
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 63.26, N = 3 5283
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1017.08, N = 3 84533
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 90.60, N = 4 5522
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 177
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 121
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 121
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.56, N = 6 103.58
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 108
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 108
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 124
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 109
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 139
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 12.78, N = 3 2836
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 881.92, N = 3 181333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 47.94, N = 3 3239
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 4.16, N = 3 3394
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 333.33, N = 3 108667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 55.52, N = 6 3158
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 30.87, N = 3 3752
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 484.19, N = 3 60033
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 40.04, N = 6 398
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 54.50, N = 6 3792
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 29.49, N = 3 3546
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 4.73, N = 3 1521
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 1201.85, N = 3 389667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 6.17, N = 3 3403
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 47.85, N = 6 2181
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 6106.92, N = 6 279167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 48.34, N = 3 3267
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 80.70, N = 5 5276
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 650.69, N = 5 42220
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 101.13, N = 3 5185
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 47.75, N = 3 5432
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 200.00, N = 3 21700
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 37.62, N = 3 5392
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 88.19, N = 3 10767
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 179
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 121
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 124
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 231.09, N = 6 3675
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 1849.86, N = 6 29400
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 8.39, N = 6 173
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 60.01, N = 3 3957
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 251.66, N = 3 15800
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 5.84, N = 3 4070
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 64.14, N = 6 2719
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4066.12, N = 6 174000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 60.51, N = 3 3249
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 19.55, N = 3 3350
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 577.35, N = 3 107000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 9.68, N = 3 3300
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 8.74, N = 3 3745
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 152.75, N = 3 59900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 18.57, N = 6 404
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 6.59, N = 6 191
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 217
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 3.62, N = 6 86.80
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 929.87, N = 6 21900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 26.72, N = 6 244
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.22, N = 6 130
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 592.03, N = 6 16250
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 40.26, N = 6 280
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 39.10, N = 6 330
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 6.36, N = 3 442
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.18, N = 3 188
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 821.25, N = 3 48233
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 35.53, N = 6 385
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 217
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 251.66, N = 3 27800
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 21.15, N = 6 386
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.58, N = 6 151
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.53, N = 3 187
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.76, N = 6 29.52
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 15.60, N = 6 235
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 1.80, N = 6 48.70
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 7.32, N = 6 315
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 81.87, N = 6 3686
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 656.46, N = 6 29483
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.59, N = 6 130
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 14.80, N = 3 4050
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 57.74, N = 3 16200
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 91.12, N = 6 3750
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 176
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 120.19, N = 3 11233
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 479
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 24.41, N = 6 145.12
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 3.79, N = 3 493
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 5.23, N = 6 109.25
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 39.02, N = 6 377
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 150
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 5.76, N = 6 188
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 92.13
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 202.76, N = 3 23567
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 6.33, N = 6 228
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 111
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 417.67, N = 3 13833
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 9.87, N = 6 306
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 6728
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 26.19, N = 3 6218
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 15.63, N = 3 2986
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 4041.45, N = 3 764000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5517
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 54.56, N = 3 4285
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 7172.48, N = 3 548333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 6.81, N = 3 5382
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.93, N = 4 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 113
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 1.66, N = 6 71.23
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 560.95, N = 6 17900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 131
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.87, N = 6 101.95
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 244.49, N = 6 13033
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 16.16, N = 6 144
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 479
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K 30700
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 27.73, N = 6 519
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 67.18, N = 6 343.77
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 308.22, N = 4 14000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 45.19, N = 6 501
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 55.37, N = 6 305.98
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 55.39, N = 6 574
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 36.66, N = 6 336
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 32.93, N = 6 347
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 10.40, N = 6 263
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 2652.50, N = 6 67233
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 31.82, N = 6 373
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 19.95, N = 6 264
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 2562.90, N = 6 33733
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 27.99, N = 6 371
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 74.59, N = 6 3792
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 69.60, N = 3 3999
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 1.14, N = 6 24.08
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 60.36, N = 3 4419
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 107.30, N = 6 279.27
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 15155.11, N = 4 51325
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 80.63, N = 6 4500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 3.17, N = 6 67.10
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 13.51, N = 6 366
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 1.24, N = 6 69.85
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 12.11, N = 6 401
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.67, N = 6 81.13
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 18.62, N = 6 512
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 165
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.82, N = 6 181
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.52, N = 6 29.00
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.14, N = 5 222
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 1.85, N = 6 43.82
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.57, N = 5 328
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 54.40, N = 5 3967
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 75.54, N = 6 3938
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.51, N = 6 27.32
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 130.03, N = 6 4557
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 78.76, N = 6 389
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 9983.81, N = 6 49650
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 31.71, N = 3 5401
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 119
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.02, N = 4 117
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 525.20, N = 4 29850
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 127
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 121
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 317.98, N = 3 15567
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.66, N = 6 128
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.15, N = 6 129
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 138
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.65, N = 6 75.80
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 430.50, N = 6 19400
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 140
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.61, N = 4 97.85
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 212.13, N = 4 12500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 143
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 137
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 513
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 7.70, N = 6 139
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.16, N = 6 150
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 8.77, N = 6 151
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 400.00, N = 2 11000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 33.24, N = 6 315
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 11.44, N = 6 137
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 22.76, N = 6 330
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.75, N = 6 112.60
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 15.66, N = 6 322
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 38.75, N = 3 5544
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 2603.42, N = 3 354667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 11.61, N = 3 5473
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 15.57, N = 3 6246
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 333.33, N = 3 199667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 14.26, N = 3 5486
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 11.05, N = 3 6622
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 106000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 5518
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 7.86, N = 3 6779
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 32.05, N = 3 6403
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 5.93, N = 3 2977
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 1527.53, N = 3 762000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 22.98, N = 3 5577
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 8.62, N = 3 4354
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 1201.85, N = 3 557667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 3.06, N = 3 5437
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.15, N = 6 127
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 202
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 147
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 195
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.12, N = 6 128
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.58, N = 6 195
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 4.41, N = 6 176
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.30, N = 6 189
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 1.37, N = 6 72.07
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 354.73, N = 6 18450
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 205
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 5.03, N = 6 102.45
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 648.80, N = 6 13117
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 12.62, N = 6 198
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 62.29, N = 6 3853
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 88.67, N = 6 3399
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 81.31, N = 6 2092
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 20779.40, N = 6 535500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 22.45, N = 3 3386
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 88.09, N = 6 2742
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 11276.57, N = 6 351167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 108.77, N = 6 3100
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 522
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 6.56, N = 3 907
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 73.77, N = 6 362.12
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 55.20, N = 6 349
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 46.36, N = 6 320
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 2415.86, N = 5 22480
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 35.60, N = 6 408
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 26.00, N = 6 353
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 679.92, N = 4 12375
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 25.93, N = 6 419
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 18.03, N = 6 310
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 19.20, N = 6 533
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 140.71, N = 6 801
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 9001.50, N = 6 51283
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 5.57, N = 3 5595
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 60.71, N = 6 1882
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 1935.19, N = 6 60217
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 12.24, N = 3 5700
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 48.50, N = 3 2578
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 768.84, N = 3 41233
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 11.46, N = 3 5822
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 71.36, N = 3 3877
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 52.95, N = 6 3882
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 21.43
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 87.58, N = 6 4319
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 35.66, N = 6 70.77
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K 31900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 111.09, N = 6 4475
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.58, N = 6 98.75
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 23.93, N = 6 599
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 125
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 3.38, N = 6 54.80
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 6.66, N = 3 358
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 2.28, N = 6 64.05
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 23.90, N = 6 371
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.04, N = 3 78.97
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 9.99, N = 6 463
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 117.06, N = 6 2536
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 7427.05, N = 6 162167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 7.75, N = 3 5387
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 45.41, N = 6 2230
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 1465.32, N = 6 71350
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 7.84, N = 3 5659
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 51.91, N = 6 2999
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 836.83, N = 6 47983
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 7.81, N = 3 5766
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 24.79, N = 3 3856
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 81.09, N = 6 4237
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.90, N = 6 28.62
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 100.50, N = 6 4624
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 48.30, N = 6 422
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 6169.21, N = 6 54050
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 7.00, N = 3 5417
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 113
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 16.31, N = 6 147
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.73, N = 5 117
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 15.90, N = 6 145
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.02, N = 6 124
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 115
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 425.57, N = 3 29367
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.03, N = 3 122
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.52, N = 6 121
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 308.13, N = 6 15317
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.23, N = 6 123
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 133.77, N = 6 3076
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 20.04, N = 3 3256
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 6.66, N = 3 1250
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 320000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 18.61, N = 3 3266
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 16.91, N = 3 1875
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 2185.81, N = 3 240333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 21.73, N = 3 3261
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 108
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.79, N = 6 139
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 5.68, N = 6 167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 109
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 5.34, N = 6 218
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 122
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 125
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.19, N = 5 77.62
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 305.61, N = 5 19880
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.40, N = 3 134
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.87, N = 6 93.43
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 237.58, N = 6 11967
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.65, N = 6 136
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 78.83, N = 6 3228
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 33.61, N = 3 3360
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 22.35, N = 4 1384
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5588.31, N = 4 354250
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 11.78, N = 3 3361
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.81, N = 3 2379
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 881.92, N = 3 304667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 12.88, N = 3 3432
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.13, N = 6 151
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 53.64, N = 6 414
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.96, N = 3 153
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.19, N = 3 164
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 26.61, N = 3 6796
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 202.76, N = 3 54333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 256.43, N = 6 5105
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 103.98, N = 6 6666
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 420.05, N = 6 26667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 9.70, N = 3 6828
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 13633
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 35.78, N = 3 5590
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 2333.33, N = 3 357667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 5472
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 11.14, N = 3 6256
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K 200000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5490
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 14.89, N = 3 6659
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 333.33, N = 3 106667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 8.09, N = 3 5521
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 116
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 247
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 136
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 151
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.52, N = 6 133
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.10, N = 6 195
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.58, N = 6 157
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 201
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 128
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 201
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 99.09, N = 6 3191
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 6241.88, N = 6 204167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 4.91, N = 3 3335
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 16.76, N = 3 3865
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 577.35, N = 3 124000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 59.83, N = 3 3279
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 62.42, N = 6 3923
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 994.57, N = 6 62750
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 17.02, N = 6 246
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 13.20, N = 3 3912
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 75.93, N = 6 3394
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 33.09, N = 4 2205
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 8419.97, N = 4 564250
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 157.58, N = 6 3117
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 40.81, N = 3 2964
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5174.72, N = 3 379333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 79.21, N = 6 3202
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 524
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.33, N = 3 913
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 66.93, N = 6 370.90
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 74.57, N = 6 350.35
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 29.61, N = 3 3692
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 218.58, N = 3 29533
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 3.18, N = 3 6042
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 42.55, N = 3 3983
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 185.59, N = 3 15933
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 59.19, N = 4 4064
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 259.14, N = 6 1262
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 16546.76, N = 6 80700
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 5.81, N = 3 5586
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 32.43, N = 3 2420
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 17K 34K 51K 68K 85K SE +/- 1040.83, N = 3 77400
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 13.92, N = 3 5686
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 373.90, N = 6 2627
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 5975.47, N = 6 42017
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 8.51, N = 3 5817
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.40, N = 6 104
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 57.30, N = 6 568
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.86, N = 6 123
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 145
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 57.95, N = 6 3890
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 457.83, N = 6 31117
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 7.88, N = 3 5913
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 169.20, N = 6 3215
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 666.21, N = 6 12850
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 92.51, N = 6 3805
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 167.87, N = 6 2303
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 10704.10, N = 6 147333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 44.61, N = 3 5356
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 182.23, N = 6 3077
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 5878.32, N = 6 98500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 2.91, N = 3 5668
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 44.63, N = 6 3337
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 703.05, N = 6 53383
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 10.69, N = 3 5758
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 13.71, N = 6 134
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 116
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.84, N = 4 122
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.78, N = 4 116
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 112
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 10.02, N = 6 131
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 114
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 16.24, N = 6 152
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 32.57, N = 6 2335
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2060.20, N = 6 149333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 3.71, N = 3 3272
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 9.07, N = 3 2803
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 284.80, N = 3 89667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 10.54, N = 3 3427
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 13.87, N = 3 3109
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 202.76, N = 3 49733
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 24.20, N = 6 496
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 19.50, N = 3 3372
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 139.32, N = 6 2996
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 43.98, N = 6 1143
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 11250.93, N = 6 292500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 37.21, N = 3 3193
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 25.64, N = 3 1844
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 3055.05, N = 3 236000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 52.87, N = 6 3182
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 114
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 10.18, N = 6 221
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 116
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.31, N = 3 118
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 106
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.02, N = 6 140
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 108
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 5.39, N = 6 171
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 107
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.31, N = 5 218
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 62.56, N = 6 2887
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4038.70, N = 6 184667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 2.19, N = 3 3366
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 12.34, N = 3 3172
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 333.33, N = 3 101667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 27.28, N = 3 3465
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 10.71, N = 3 3241
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 176.38, N = 3 51867
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 35.43, N = 6 410
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 59.34, N = 3 3319
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 31.87, N = 3 3374
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.00, N = 3 1398
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 333.33, N = 3 357667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 8.82, N = 3 3411
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 14.26, N = 3 2353
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 301000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 5.51, N = 3 3438
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 6.36, N = 3 6510
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 366.67, N = 3 51733
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 5408
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 17.79, N = 3 6532
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 400.00, N = 3 25800
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 8.19, N = 3 6586
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 13167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 5.16, N = 6 198
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 135
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 147
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 89.67, N = 6 3650
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 764.82, N = 6 28883
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 7.11, N = 6 138
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 154.69, N = 6 3517
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 650.85, N = 6 13917
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 167.03, N = 6 3312
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 135.68, N = 6 3113
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 8677.24, N = 6 199167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 192.25, N = 6 2690
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 15.84, N = 3 3872
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 666.67, N = 3 123667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 55.16, N = 6 3296
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 101.11, N = 6 3635
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 1612.38, N = 6 58167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 18.87, N = 6 146
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 32.38, N = 3 3810
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 88.19, N = 3 30167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 9.35, N = 3 5915
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 41.87, N = 3 3874
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 173.21, N = 3 15500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 55.89, N = 5 4066
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 19.08, N = 3 3937
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 152.75, N = 3 31500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 9.50, N = 3 5778
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 39.25, N = 3 4036
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 166.67, N = 3 16133
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 30.12, N = 3 4190
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 118
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 14.14, N = 6 132
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 114
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.02, N = 4 117
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 119.80, N = 6 3079
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 960.01, N = 6 24617
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.91, N = 3 548
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 58.27, N = 6 3285
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 234.76, N = 6 13167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 26.21, N = 3 3393
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 10.00, N = 3 2418
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 666.67, N = 3 154667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 7.84, N = 3 3342
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 6.01, N = 3 2823
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 185.59, N = 3 90333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 47.59, N = 5 3336
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 48.45, N = 4 2987
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 777.82, N = 4 47800
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 20.05, N = 6 488
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 113
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 5.60, N = 6 218
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.40, N = 3 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 79.83, N = 6 3107
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 642.78, N = 6 24850
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 7.92, N = 6 238
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 86.51, N = 6 2653
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 202.48, N = 5 10900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 49.93, N = 6 2878
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 62.99, N = 6 2803
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4087.92, N = 6 179667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 78.45, N = 6 3304
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 114.46, N = 6 2718
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 3632.42, N = 6 86933
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 181.56, N = 6 2790
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 138.77, N = 6 2976
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 2170.52, N = 6 47450
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 16.61, N = 6 362
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 526
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 61.24, N = 6 416
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 28.58, N = 6 201.18
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 7301.94, N = 6 51483
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 34.94, N = 6 378
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 27.07, N = 6 324
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 3457.46, N = 6 41500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 16.69, N = 6 373
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 7.65, N = 6 166
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 3.34, N = 6 183
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 3.06, N = 6 87.25
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 729.73, N = 6 22150
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 7.17, N = 6 242
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 126
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 233.33, N = 3 16033
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 10.02, N = 6 296
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 159.47, N = 6 3414
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 1273.69, N = 6 27317
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 7.16, N = 6 127.32
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 95.22, N = 6 3882
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 371.18, N = 6 15533
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Sync - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 125.62, N = 6 3664
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 33.27, N = 3 3294
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 284.80, N = 3 26367
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 9.43, N = 6 527
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 91.60, N = 6 3083
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 370.29, N = 6 12333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 64.97, N = 3 3321
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 63.98, N = 3 3247
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 517.47, N = 3 25933
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.91, N = 3 241
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 8.84, N = 3 3307
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 13233
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 50.65, N = 4 3203
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 509
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 32567
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 81.31, N = 6 441
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 64.96, N = 6 361
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 983.62, N = 4 14650
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 52.30, N = 6 455
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 44.09, N = 6 342
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 28.03, N = 6 555
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 29.21, N = 6 350
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 24.72, N = 6 351
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 6.76, N = 6 249
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 1709.32, N = 6 63733
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 5.33, N = 5 342
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 19.78, N = 6 310
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 2547.02, N = 6 39700
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 10.48, N = 6 377
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 9.56, N = 3 5265
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 9.24, N = 3 5311
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 8.82, N = 3 1657
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 2403.70, N = 3 424333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 6.56, N = 3 5336
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 11.15, N = 3 2740
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 1201.85, N = 3 350667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 22.81, N = 3 5427
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.70, N = 6 145
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10100
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 7.64, N = 6 380
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 9.27, N = 6 168
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 26.70, N = 6 385
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.33, N = 6 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 12.12, N = 6 494
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 166
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 188
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.67, N = 6 90.43
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 418.53, N = 6 23150
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 4.74, N = 6 249
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.70, N = 6 115
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 465.77, N = 6 14717
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 6.52, N = 6 319
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 11.79, N = 3 5268
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 3.93, N = 3 5323
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 11.85, N = 3 1699
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 2962.73, N = 3 434667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 5349
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 28.39, N = 3 2843
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 3511.88, N = 3 364000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 8.72, N = 3 5449
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.03, N = 6 114
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 112
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 108
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 185.59, N = 3 27767
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 109
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 300.00, N = 3 13600
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 112
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 2.55, N = 6 74.27
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 653.41, N = 6 19017
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 141
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 3.21, N = 6 105.15
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 413.12, N = 6 13500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 145
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 529
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 17.56, N = 3 897
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 46.11, N = 6 356
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 49.74, N = 6 340
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 4.18, N = 3 427
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 284.80, N = 3 27367
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 32.51, N = 6 382
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 23.66, N = 6 326
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 723.85, N = 4 11325
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 24.55, N = 6 444
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 15.88, N = 6 349
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 15.29, N = 6 530
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 10.82, N = 3 3892
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 577.35, N = 3 249000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 3.79, N = 3 5498
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 17.17, N = 3 4629
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K 148000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 13.48, N = 3 5552
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 18.58, N = 3 4641
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 296.27, N = 3 74267
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 15.34, N = 3 5686
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 9.39, N = 3 5185
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 4.70, N = 3 5241
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 21.36, N = 3 1631
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 5487.36, N = 3 417667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 10.91, N = 3 5266
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 3.93, N = 3 2720
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 577.35, N = 3 348000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 11.85, N = 3 5404
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.01, N = 6 131
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 11.07, N = 6 612
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.73, N = 3 136
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.69, N = 6 144
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.57, N = 6 146
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 6.99, N = 6 378
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.82, N = 6 149
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 14.93, N = 6 413
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 120
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 12.09, N = 6 478
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 24.84, N = 3 5019
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 1452.97, N = 3 321333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 10.73, N = 3 5572
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 35.14, N = 3 5443
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1154.70, N = 3 174000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5618
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 14.68, N = 3 5136
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 233.33, N = 3 82133
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 28.42, N = 3 5683
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 14.77, N = 3 5278
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 10.17, N = 3 5341
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 1692
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 1000.00, N = 3 433000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 14.73, N = 3 5362
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 27.18, N = 3 2839
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 3333.33, N = 3 363333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 9.61, N = 3 5490
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 112
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 108
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 112
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.17, N = 6 117
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 110
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 288.68, N = 3 27500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.44, N = 6 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 113
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 218.58, N = 3 14467
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 59.50, N = 6 2631
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 9.40, N = 3 2780
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 43.85, N = 6 1258
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 11182.33, N = 6 322333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 86.86, N = 6 3027
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 64.11, N = 6 1923
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 8132.24, N = 6 246000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 6.94, N = 3 3308
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.97, N = 4 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 137
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 178
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 107
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 191
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 112
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.10, N = 3 75.40
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 300.00, N = 3 19300
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 115
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.71, N = 6 89.32
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 349.05, N = 6 11450
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 131
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 133.94, N = 6 2786
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 66.78, N = 3 3314
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 20.81, N = 3 1424
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 5206.83, N = 3 364333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 58.67, N = 6 3290
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 77.48, N = 6 2005
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 9928.91, N = 6 256500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 75.38, N = 6 3137
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 530
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 12.42, N = 3 898
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 48.24, N = 6 363
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 50.32, N = 6 345
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 4.18, N = 3 4857
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 38867
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 8.41, N = 3 5953
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 4997
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 333.33, N = 3 19333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 12.66, N = 3 5131
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 10267
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 11.61, N = 3 3917
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 666.67, N = 3 250667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 5539
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 14.00, N = 3 4676
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 333.33, N = 3 149667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 6.11, N = 3 5616
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 6.35, N = 3 4710
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 88.19, N = 3 75367
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 15.33, N = 3 5721
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 8.50, N = 6 117.20
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 31.62, N = 6 644
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.47, N = 6 131
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.40, N = 6 139
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 3.67, N = 3 5134
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 41033
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 5843
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 10.91, N = 3 5165
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 20667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 22.26, N = 3 5225
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 10467
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 8.41, N = 3 5016
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 577.35, N = 3 321000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 9.61, N = 3 5556
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 19.08, N = 3 5540
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 577.35, N = 3 177000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 11.70, N = 3 5631
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 12.73, N = 3 5111
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 208.17, N = 3 81800
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 6.12, N = 3 5717
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 135
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 126
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.03, N = 3 121
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.06, N = 6 113
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 108
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 109
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 109
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 8.20, N = 6 119
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 109
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 155.18, N = 6 2198
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 9935.35, N = 6 140667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 124.59, N = 6 3010
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 80.76, N = 6 2731
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 2587.36, N = 6 87367
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 166.61, N = 6 2656
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 59.49, N = 6 3031
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 949.74, N = 6 48500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 5.24, N = 3 340
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 2.31, N = 3 3396
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 140.00, N = 6 2921
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 78.55, N = 6 1161
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 20131.93, N = 6 297167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 90.42, N = 6 2916
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 124.34, N = 6 1826
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 15885.00, N = 6 234000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 174.84, N = 6 2704
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 192
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 98.93
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 134
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 105
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 174
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 108
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 191
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 134.31, N = 6 2879
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 8628.12, N = 6 184333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 122.08, N = 6 3036
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 85.28, N = 6 3111
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 2710.40, N = 6 99517
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 9.35, N = 3 3535
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 85.02, N = 6 3117
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 1357.80, N = 6 49683
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 15.66, N = 6 245
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 1MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 71.96, N = 6 2450
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 12.88, N = 3 2822
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 48.10, N = 6 1313
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 12372.01, N = 6 336000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 88.21, N = 6 2905
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 111.92, N = 6 1945
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 14273.52, N = 6 249000
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 141.47, N = 6 2832
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 4800
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 57.74, N = 3 38400
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 5875
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 12.44, N = 3 4918
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 19667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 8.41, N = 3 5060
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10100
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 3.53, N = 3 5041
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 33.33, N = 3 40333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 14.19, N = 3 5734
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 15.52, N = 3 5086
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 66.67, N = 3 20333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 12.01, N = 3 5143
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10300
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.55, N = 5 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 109
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 117.66, N = 6 2815
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 943.63, N = 6 22533
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 9.33, N = 3 500
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 154.65, N = 6 2363
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12100
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 2892
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 65.16, N = 6 2319
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 4079.76, N = 6 148333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 124.73, N = 6 2729
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 29.87, N = 3 2959
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 935.12, N = 3 94667
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 167.57, N = 6 2728
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 49.02, N = 4 3140
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 792.67, N = 4 50200
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 9.63, N = 6 298
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.69, N = 6 116
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 194
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 110
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 111
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 99.37, N = 6 2742
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 768.30, N = 6 21783
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 203
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 136.31, N = 6 2976
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 554.38, N = 6 11900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 8.09, N = 3 3357
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 89.31, N = 6 3083
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 5694.54, N = 6 197167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 122.47, N = 6 2933
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 25.41, N = 3 3320
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 881.92, N = 3 106333
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 17.85, N = 3 3466
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 88.38, N = 6 3074
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 1415.55, N = 6 49167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 64MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 13.67, N = 6 238
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 128.09, N = 6 3021
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 1027.19, N = 6 24167
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 7.55, N = 6 488
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 84.72, N = 6 2276
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10200
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 53.87, N = 6 2866
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 110.96, N = 6 3026
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 883.33, N = 6 24217
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 128MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 207
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 126.89, N = 6 2885
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 256KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 451.66, N = 5 11900
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 512KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory SAMSUNG MZNLN256 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 115.20, N = 6 3005
SAMSUNG MZNLN256 Disk Notes: CFQ / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Testing initiated at 11 June 2019 00:19 by user marius.
Intel Core i5-6200U Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Testing initiated at 11 June 2019 00:22 by user marius.
Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079 Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Testing initiated at 11 June 2019 00:26 by user marius.
Intel HD 520 Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Testing initiated at 11 June 2019 01:18 by user marius.
Intel Connection I219-V Processor: Intel Core i5-6200U @ 2.80GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8079 (N75 Ver. 01.18 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZNLN256, Graphics: Intel HD 520 3072MB (1000MHz), Audio: Conexant CX20724, Network: Intel Connection I219-V + Intel Wireless 8260
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.18.0-21-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.8, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveSecurity Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling Protection
Testing initiated at 13 June 2019 23:34 by user marius.