NVIDIA AMD Linux GPU Compute December 2018

TU104BM benchmarks on the Clevo P775TM1-R

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1908289-HV-1908277KH01
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts

Limit displaying results to tests within:

NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
OpenCL 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
GTX 1070
December 08 2018
  39 Minutes
GTX 1070 Ti
December 08 2018
  37 Minutes
GTX 1080
December 07 2018
  37 Minutes
GTX 1080 Ti
December 08 2018
  30 Minutes
RTX 2070
December 07 2018
  13 Minutes
RTX 2080
December 07 2018
  32 Minutes
RTX 2080 Ti
December 07 2018
  28 Minutes
R9 Fury
December 07 2018
  17 Minutes
RX Vega 56
December 07 2018
  17 Minutes
RX Vega 64
December 07 2018
  18 Minutes
TU104BM
August 27 2019
 
P775TM1-R
August 28 2019
  3 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  23 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


NVIDIA AMD Linux GPU Compute December 2018ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080RTX 2080 TiR9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64TU104BMP775TM1-RIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM16384MB2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB (1506/4006MHz)Realtek ALC1220Acer B286HKIntel ConnectionUbuntu 18.044.19.5-041905-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.28.3X Server 1.19.6NVIDIA 415.224.6.0OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.1321.1.84GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0ext43840x2160Zotac NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB (1607/4006MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB (1607/5005MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB (1480/5508MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB (1410/7000MHz)Zotac NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB (1515/7000MHz)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz)Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 FURY / NANO 4GB (1000/500MHz)4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0)OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2679.0)1.1.70GCC 7.3.0AMD Radeon RX Vega 8GB (1590/800MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8GB (1630/945MHz)Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (16 Cores)EVOC P7xxTM1 powered by premamodIntel 8th Gen Core 8-core Desktop /DRAM64512MB2 x 4001GB Samsung SSD 860NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8192MB (300/405MHz)Realtek ALC898Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 Gigabit + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX2005.2.9 (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.28.4NVIDIA 435.174.6.0CUDA 10.11920x1080Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)EVOC P7xxTM1 powered by premamod (1.07.EVOC2 BIOS)Intel 8th Gen Core 8-core Desktop2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 960 EVO 1TB + 2 x 4001GB Samsung SSD 860NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB (1380/7000MHz)Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX2005.2.10 (x86_64)X Server 1.19.6OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.0GCC 7.4.0 + CUDA 10.1OpenBenchmarking.orgCompiler Details- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Details- GTX 1070: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GTX 1070 Ti: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GTX 1080: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- GTX 1080 Ti: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- RTX 2070: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- RTX 2080: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- RTX 2080 Ti: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- R9 Fury: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- RX Vega 56: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- RX Vega 64: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- TU104BM: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- P775TM1-R: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveOpenCL Details- GTX 1070: GPU Compute Cores: 1920- GTX 1070 Ti: GPU Compute Cores: 2432- GTX 1080: GPU Compute Cores: 2560- GTX 1080 Ti: GPU Compute Cores: 3584- RTX 2070: GPU Compute Cores: 2304- RTX 2080: GPU Compute Cores: 2944- RTX 2080 Ti: GPU Compute Cores: 4352- TU104BM: GPU Compute Cores: 2944- P775TM1-R: GPU Compute Cores: 2944Security Details- GTX 1070: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- GTX 1070 Ti: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- GTX 1080: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- GTX 1080 Ti: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- RTX 2070: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- RTX 2080: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- RTX 2080 Ti: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- R9 Fury: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- RX Vega 56: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- RX Vega 64: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp- P775TM1-R: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB fillingKernel Details- TU104BM, P775TM1-R: psmouse.synaptics_intertouch=1System Details- TU104BM: GPU Compute Cores: 2944.

NVIDIA AMD Linux GPU Compute December 2018cuda-mini-nbody: Originalshoc: OpenCL - Texture Read Bandwidthcl-mem: Copyshoc: OpenCL - FFT SPshoc: OpenCL - MD5 Hashngc-tensorflow: ResNet-50, FP16ngc-tensorflow: AlexNet, FP16ngc-tensorflow: ResNet-50, FP32ngc-tensorflow: AlexNet, FP32ngc-tensorflow: Googlenet, FP16ngc-tensorflow: Inception v4, FP16ngc-tensorflow: VGG-16, FP16ngc-tensorflow: VGG-16, FP32luxmark: GPU - Luxball HDRv-ray: CUDA GPUGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080RTX 2080 TiR9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64TU104BMP775TM1-R91.9945118745210.721601563125151637544.7776.9371.571728890.4311243318849711.631751683133159141349.2384.4376.401688686.3011153020957514.171931875143176445855.0393.1382.9013823102.0718659531797219.962712674210253962974.63131.37119.502156266.41244110133099819.2930921743009166.023041119328108324.3733531532052419738102.77153.33108.572964172.074261134454144335.86449443228533441015135.90206.97152.404269356.092502058469.202344838420392614.0331179442221107016.5332815255.50252.621118276110621.06OpenBenchmarking.org

GPU Temperature Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsiusGPU Temperature MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringR9 FuryRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiRTX 2070RX Vega 64RX Vega 56GTX 1070 Ti1632486480Min: 33 / Avg: 66.96 / Max: 79Min: 35 / Avg: 66.5 / Max: 80Min: 33 / Avg: 66.46 / Max: 80Min: 45 / Avg: 63.06 / Max: 79Min: 31 / Avg: 61.13 / Max: 75Min: 34 / Avg: 60.3 / Max: 76Min: 33 / Avg: 54.57 / Max: 64Min: 28 / Avg: 52.98 / Max: 85Min: 31 / Avg: 51.02 / Max: 75Min: 36 / Avg: 46.92 / Max: 60

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringRTX 2080 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RX Vega 64R9 FuryGTX 1080RTX 2070GTX 1070RX Vega 56GTX 1070 Ti70140210280350Min: 45.5 / Avg: 208.03 / Max: 346.7Min: 43.4 / Avg: 200.91 / Max: 320.9Min: 43.9 / Avg: 175.16 / Max: 287.8Min: 48.4 / Avg: 169.45 / Max: 358.6Min: 79.9 / Avg: 160.12 / Max: 365.3Min: 42.2 / Avg: 154.56 / Max: 251.7Min: 42.1 / Avg: 146.13 / Max: 247.2Min: 41.9 / Avg: 143.92 / Max: 213.8Min: 48.8 / Avg: 143.52 / Max: 284.1Min: 45.9 / Avg: 127.84 / Max: 213.8

CUDA Mini-Nbody

OpenBenchmarking.org(NBody^2)/s, More Is BetterCUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10Test: OriginalGTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2070P775TM1-RTU104BMRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti90180270360450SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 1.17, N = 3SE +/- 2.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 391.99111.00112.00186.00244.00252.62255.50304.00426.00

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s Per Dollar, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Performance / Cost - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read BandwidthGTX 1080 TiRX Vega 64RX Vega 56RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080RTX 20700.4140.8281.2421.6562.070.850.930.940.950.960.971.131.401.841. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.2. RX Vega 64: $475 reported cost.3. RX Vega 56: $409 reported cost.4. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.5. GTX 1070 Ti: $449 reported cost.6. GTX 1080: $549 reported cost.7. GTX 1070: $399 reported cost.8. RTX 2080: $798 reported cost.9. RTX 2070: $599 reported cost.

cl-mem

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s Per Dollar, More Is Bettercl-mem 2017-01-13Performance / Cost - Benchmark: CopyGTX 1080RTX 2080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiGTX 1070RX Vega 64RX Vega 56RTX 20700.12380.24760.37140.49520.6190.380.380.410.420.450.470.470.500.551. GTX 1080: $549 reported cost.2. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.3. RTX 2080: $798 reported cost.4. GTX 1070 Ti: $449 reported cost.5. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.6. GTX 1070: $399 reported cost.7. RX Vega 64: $475 reported cost.8. RX Vega 56: $409 reported cost.9. RTX 2070: $599 reported cost.

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s Per Watt, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read BandwidthR9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 1080 TiGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080RTX 2080 TiRTX 2080RTX 20702468101.451.941.983.133.353.533.665.086.596.76

cl-mem

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s Per Watt, More Is Bettercl-mem 2017-01-13Benchmark: CopyRX Vega 64RX Vega 56R9 FuryGTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 TiRTX 2080RTX 20700.8731.7462.6193.4924.3651.021.031.241.361.401.771.772.523.533.88

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing

The CUDA and OpenCL version of Vetter's Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing benchmark suite. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read BandwidthR9 FuryRX Vega 56GTX 1070 TiRX Vega 64GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070P775TM1-RRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti2004006008001000SE +/- 1.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 1.72, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 2.41, N = 3SE +/- 1.33, N = 3SE +/- 4.14, N = 3SE +/- 3.18, N = 3SE +/- 3.81, N = 32503844334424515305951101111811191134-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommon -lrt

cl-mem

A basic OpenCL memory benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettercl-mem 2017-01-13Benchmark: CopyGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiRX Vega 56R9 FuryGTX 1080RX Vega 64P775TM1-RGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti100200300400500SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.75, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 31871882032052092212763173283304541. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -flto -lOpenCL

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing

OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPS Per Dollar, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Performance / Cost - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SPGTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1070RTX 2080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RX Vega 64RX Vega 560.50851.0171.52552.0342.54251.051.111.131.201.361.391.672.252.261. GTX 1080: $549 reported cost.2. GTX 1070 Ti: $449 reported cost.3. GTX 1070: $399 reported cost.4. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.5. RTX 2080: $798 reported cost.6. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.7. RTX 2070: $599 reported cost.8. RX Vega 64: $475 reported cost.9. RX Vega 56: $409 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPS, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SPGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080R9 FuryRX Vega 56GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RX Vega 64RTX 2080P775TM1-RRTX 2080 Ti30060090012001500SE +/- 0.94, N = 3SE +/- 0.73, N = 3SE +/- 2.68, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 1.57, N = 3SE +/- 1.23, N = 3SE +/- 40.79, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 5.95, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 14.24, N = 34524975758469269729981070108311061443-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommon -lrt

OpenBenchmarking.orgGHash/s, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 HashR9 FuryGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiRX Vega 56GTX 1080RX Vega 64RTX 2070GTX 1080 TiP775TM1-RRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 39.2010.7211.6314.0314.1716.5319.2919.9621.0624.3735.86-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lOpenCL-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft-std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lpthread -ldl -lcufft1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommon -lrt

OpenBenchmarking.orgGHash/s Per Dollar, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Performance / Cost - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 HashGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080RTX 2080 TiRX Vega 56RX Vega 640.00680.01360.02040.02720.0340.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.031. GTX 1070: $399 reported cost.2. GTX 1070 Ti: $449 reported cost.3. GTX 1080: $549 reported cost.4. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.5. RTX 2070: $599 reported cost.6. RTX 2080: $798 reported cost.7. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.8. RX Vega 56: $409 reported cost.9. RX Vega 64: $475 reported cost.

clpeak

OpenBenchmarking.orgGIOPS, More Is BetterclpeakOpenCL Test: Integer Compute INTR9 FuryGTX 1070RX Vega 56GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080RX Vega 64GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 9.42, N = 3SE +/- 1.96, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 8.46, N = 3SE +/- 1.38, N = 3SE +/- 12.10, N = 3SE +/- 552.67, N = 3SE +/- 601.95, N = 3SE +/- 946.18, N = 3143016921991208224372491332180071005914385

OpenBenchmarking.orgGIOPS Per Dollar, More Is BetterclpeakPerformance / Cost - OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INTGTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRX Vega 56RX Vega 64RTX 2080 TiRTX 2080RTX 207036912154.244.444.644.754.875.2412.0012.6113.371. GTX 1070: $399 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $549 reported cost.3. GTX 1070 Ti: $449 reported cost.4. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.5. RX Vega 56: $409 reported cost.6. RX Vega 64: $475 reported cost.7. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.8. RTX 2080: $798 reported cost.9. RTX 2070: $599 reported cost.

NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.47250.9451.41751.892.36250.921.021.141.221.861.902.10

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP32GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti0.25880.51760.77641.03521.2940.730.730.840.890.991.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti100200300400500SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3160175193271309335449

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti6121824309.8611.1912.3912.5316.5324.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP32GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiRTX 2080RTX 2070GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 Ti36912159.619.9010.9911.4411.7212.1912.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1070 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti0.91581.83162.74743.66324.5792.062.132.452.533.214.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti10002000300040005000SE +/- 2.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 2.60, N = 3SE +/- 1.32, N = 3SE +/- 3.35, N = 3SE +/- 2.27, N = 3156316831875267431534432

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti0.16650.3330.49950.6660.83250.280.300.340.350.580.74

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti0.21150.4230.63450.8461.05750.460.480.530.540.690.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP32GTX 1070GTX 1080RTX 2080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 Ti0.1260.2520.3780.5040.630.420.420.450.470.490.56

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP32GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080RTX 2080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 Ti60120180240300SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3125133143205210285

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP32GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080RTX 2070RTX 2080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 Ti7001400210028003500SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 1.62, N = 3SE +/- 1.84, N = 3SE +/- 1.83, N = 3SE +/- 6.99, N = 31516159117642174241925393344

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti2004006008001000SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 2.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 33754134586297381015

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti306090120150SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 344.7749.2355.0374.63102.77135.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP16GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 Ti50100150200250SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 376.9384.4393.13131.37153.33206.97

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP32GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080RTX 2080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 Ti306090120150SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 371.5776.4082.90108.57119.50152.40

LuxMark

LuxMark is a multi-platform OpenGL benchmark using LuxRender. LuxMark supports targeting different OpenCL devices and has multiple scenes available for rendering. LuxMark is a fully open-source OpenCL program with real-world rendering examples. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDRGTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1070GTX 1080 TiR9 FuryRTX 2080RTX 2070RX Vega 56RX Vega 64RTX 2080 Ti9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 29.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 119.86, N = 3SE +/- 36.02, N = 3SE +/- 2.73, N = 3SE +/- 20.53, N = 3SE +/- 570.76, N = 3SE +/- 66.64, N = 313823168861728821562234482964130091311793281542693

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1Performance / Cost - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDRGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1070 TiGTX 1070RTX 2070RX Vega 64RX Vega 562040608010025.1830.8535.6137.1437.6143.3350.2469.0876.231. GTX 1080: $549 reported cost.2. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.3. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.4. RTX 2080: $798 reported cost.5. GTX 1070 Ti: $449 reported cost.6. GTX 1070: $399 reported cost.7. RTX 2070: $599 reported cost.8. RX Vega 64: $475 reported cost.9. RX Vega 56: $409 reported cost.

Chaos Group V-RAY

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0GPU Temperature MonitorRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2070RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 Ti1428425670Min: 50 / Avg: 68.2 / Max: 74Min: 54 / Avg: 68.11 / Max: 73Min: 48 / Avg: 62.93 / Max: 67Min: 46 / Avg: 62.55 / Max: 68Min: 53 / Avg: 60.72 / Max: 62Min: 46 / Avg: 60.03 / Max: 68Min: 38 / Avg: 47.77 / Max: 50

CUDA Mini-Nbody

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterCUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10GPU Temperature MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiRTX 2070GTX 1070 Ti1530456075Min: 65 / Avg: 74.42 / Max: 80Min: 65 / Avg: 73.5 / Max: 78Min: 64 / Avg: 73.06 / Max: 79Min: 61 / Avg: 70.86 / Max: 75Min: 58 / Avg: 64 / Max: 67Min: 55 / Avg: 60.44 / Max: 64Min: 45 / Avg: 56.11 / Max: 60

NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 TiRTX 20701428425670Min: 61 / Avg: 68.3 / Max: 75Min: 61 / Avg: 68.17 / Max: 75Min: 60 / Avg: 67.05 / Max: 75Min: 58 / Avg: 65.55 / Max: 70Min: 55 / Avg: 59.52 / Max: 65Min: 46 / Avg: 50.94 / Max: 55Min: 32 / Avg: 45.47 / Max: 58

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 Ti1530456075Min: 59 / Avg: 70.41 / Max: 77Min: 62 / Avg: 70.04 / Max: 77Min: 60 / Avg: 68.77 / Max: 75Min: 57 / Avg: 65.61 / Max: 71Min: 54 / Avg: 61.16 / Max: 67Min: 44 / Avg: 50.85 / Max: 54

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 Ti1428425670Min: 63 / Avg: 67.57 / Max: 72Min: 63 / Avg: 67.2 / Max: 70Min: 62 / Avg: 66.46 / Max: 70Min: 59 / Avg: 64.06 / Max: 67Min: 57 / Avg: 60.36 / Max: 64Min: 46 / Avg: 49.93 / Max: 53

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiRTX 2070GTX 1070 Ti1530456075Min: 59 / Avg: 69.81 / Max: 76Min: 64 / Avg: 67.58 / Max: 71Min: 63 / Avg: 66.8 / Max: 71Min: 61 / Avg: 64.2 / Max: 68Min: 53 / Avg: 61.36 / Max: 67Min: 46 / Avg: 55.88 / Max: 61Min: 44 / Avg: 49.07 / Max: 52

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 Ti1530456075Min: 60 / Avg: 73.17 / Max: 80Min: 60 / Avg: 72.84 / Max: 80Min: 58 / Avg: 72.23 / Max: 79Min: 56 / Avg: 69 / Max: 74Min: 55 / Avg: 64.78 / Max: 71Min: 43 / Avg: 52.93 / Max: 56

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 Ti1530456075Min: 56 / Avg: 66.24 / Max: 77Min: 57 / Avg: 64.7 / Max: 74Min: 51 / Avg: 64.33 / Max: 76Min: 55 / Avg: 64.07 / Max: 72Min: 53 / Avg: 57.76 / Max: 65Min: 43 / Avg: 49.56 / Max: 55

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1070GTX 1080RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 Ti1530456075Min: 61 / Avg: 70.1 / Max: 76Min: 59 / Avg: 69.86 / Max: 77Min: 59 / Avg: 66.13 / Max: 70Min: 50 / Avg: 65.84 / Max: 74Min: 54 / Avg: 61.56 / Max: 68Min: 45 / Avg: 52.18 / Max: 55

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09GPU Temperature MonitorRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070RTX 2080 TiGTX 1070 Ti1530456075Min: 61 / Avg: 74.1 / Max: 80Min: 61 / Avg: 70.55 / Max: 77Min: 60 / Avg: 69.33 / Max: 74Min: 58 / Avg: 66.1 / Max: 70Min: 56 / Avg: 65.52 / Max: 71Min: 46 / Avg: 52.21 / Max: 55

Chaos Group V-RAY

This is a test of Chaos Group's V-RAY benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0Mode: CUDA GPUGTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti20406080100SE +/- 3.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 3.00, N = 3102.0790.4386.3072.0766.4166.0256.09

clpeak

OpenBenchmarking.orgus, Fewer Is BetterclpeakOpenCL Test: Kernel LatencyRX Vega 56RX Vega 64R9 FuryGTX 1080 TiGTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiRTX 2080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 36.986.945.683.803.743.723.663.573.523.48

OpenBenchmarking.orgus x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterclpeakPerformance / Cost - OpenCL Test: Kernel LatencyRTX 2080 TiRX Vega 64RX Vega 56RTX 2080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070GTX 1080GTX 1070 TiGTX 107090018002700360045004280.433296.502854.822777.042656.202108.482042.281643.341492.261. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.2. RX Vega 64: $475 reported cost.3. RX Vega 56: $409 reported cost.4. RTX 2080: $798 reported cost.5. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.6. RTX 2070: $599 reported cost.7. GTX 1080: $549 reported cost.8. GTX 1070 Ti: $449 reported cost.9. GTX 1070: $399 reported cost.

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10System Power Consumption MonitorRX Vega 64RTX 2080 TiRX Vega 56GTX 1080 TiR9 FuryRTX 2080RTX 2070GTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti50100150200250Min: 51.8 / Avg: 223.18 / Max: 249.9Min: 47.5 / Avg: 222.96 / Max: 282.7Min: 49.4 / Avg: 197.63 / Max: 234.4Min: 120.8 / Avg: 190.06 / Max: 216.8Min: 113.9 / Avg: 172.33 / Max: 220.8Min: 47.1 / Avg: 169.8 / Max: 202.9Min: 53.7 / Avg: 162.86 / Max: 198.7Min: 89.7 / Avg: 144.76 / Max: 164.6Min: 82.6 / Avg: 134.72 / Max: 155.3Min: 47 / Avg: 122.6 / Max: 141.5

cl-mem

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Bettercl-mem 2017-01-13System Power Consumption MonitorRX Vega 64RX Vega 56RTX 2080 TiGTX 1080 TiR9 FuryGTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 TiRTX 2080RTX 207060120180240300Min: 52.4 / Avg: 216.5 / Max: 318.8Min: 49.6 / Avg: 196.84 / Max: 261.2Min: 47.1 / Avg: 180.3 / Max: 248.8Min: 120.7 / Avg: 179.53 / Max: 209Min: 90.3 / Avg: 165.77 / Max: 211.3Min: 115.3 / Avg: 149.23 / Max: 161.8Min: 82.6 / Avg: 137.43 / Max: 149.2Min: 46.1 / Avg: 105.92 / Max: 138.1Min: 46.4 / Avg: 92.77 / Max: 122Min: 43.3 / Avg: 85.23 / Max: 108.2

LuxMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLuxMark 3.1System Power Consumption MonitorRX Vega 64RTX 2080 TiRX Vega 56R9 FuryGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2070GTX 1070GTX 1080GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 53 / Avg: 323.35 / Max: 337.9Min: 111.1 / Avg: 315.29 / Max: 328.4Min: 51.8 / Avg: 251.16 / Max: 263.3Min: 90.4 / Avg: 249.15 / Max: 256.6Min: 122.9 / Avg: 241.59 / Max: 247.8Min: 101.9 / Avg: 240.83 / Max: 247.3Min: 78 / Avg: 225.33 / Max: 232.6Min: 83.1 / Avg: 176.9 / Max: 181.3Min: 90.8 / Avg: 174.24 / Max: 176.2Min: 146.8 / Avg: 148.92 / Max: 149.4

Chaos Group V-RAY

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0System Power Consumption MonitorRTX 2080 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2070GTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti50100150200250Min: 69.5 / Avg: 242.72 / Max: 272Min: 120.4 / Avg: 218.99 / Max: 231.8Min: 63 / Avg: 191.71 / Max: 202.8Min: 53.7 / Avg: 185.77 / Max: 199.3Min: 43.6 / Avg: 153.26 / Max: 165.9Min: 43.4 / Avg: 151.17 / Max: 164.2Min: 46.1 / Avg: 130.78 / Max: 135.6

CUDA Mini-Nbody

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080RTX 2070GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 50.5 / Avg: 249.72 / Max: 312.9Min: 49.1 / Avg: 234.64 / Max: 336Min: 48.7 / Avg: 233.61 / Max: 284Min: 43.7 / Avg: 223.02 / Max: 251.7Min: 54.3 / Avg: 215.38 / Max: 246.1Min: 43.7 / Avg: 194.09 / Max: 210.9Min: 47 / Avg: 185.31 / Max: 213.8

NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 TiGTX 1080RTX 2080GTX 1070RTX 2070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 54.6 / Avg: 222.3 / Max: 319.6Min: 56.1 / Avg: 213.62 / Max: 342.3Min: 44.7 / Avg: 189.85 / Max: 248.8Min: 47.3 / Avg: 179.59 / Max: 284.7Min: 42.7 / Avg: 174.04 / Max: 212.6Min: 71.1 / Avg: 162.36 / Max: 246.8Min: 47 / Avg: 153.76 / Max: 192.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorRTX 2080 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 50.5 / Avg: 248.25 / Max: 346.7Min: 79.7 / Avg: 234.81 / Max: 318.6Min: 48 / Avg: 206.72 / Max: 285Min: 44.1 / Avg: 196.38 / Max: 249.7Min: 45.9 / Avg: 172.02 / Max: 213.8Min: 48 / Avg: 157.29 / Max: 187.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 51.3 / Avg: 213.37 / Max: 303.2Min: 47.3 / Avg: 190.7 / Max: 270.1Min: 49.3 / Avg: 177.62 / Max: 332.6Min: 44.1 / Avg: 167.55 / Max: 234.8Min: 68.9 / Avg: 158.49 / Max: 192.3Min: 46.9 / Avg: 135.79 / Max: 175

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorRTX 2080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070GTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 48.9 / Avg: 257.45 / Max: 338.7Min: 48 / Avg: 211.46 / Max: 284.1Min: 126 / Avg: 208.21 / Max: 307.4Min: 64.2 / Avg: 185.45 / Max: 243.7Min: 100.9 / Avg: 178.22 / Max: 229Min: 87.1 / Avg: 157.65 / Max: 201.5Min: 48.2 / Avg: 144.76 / Max: 185.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 64 / Avg: 257.4 / Max: 319.4Min: 49.5 / Avg: 249.29 / Max: 343.1Min: 47.7 / Avg: 229.8 / Max: 284.5Min: 76.2 / Avg: 215.22 / Max: 247Min: 43.4 / Avg: 181.99 / Max: 210.5Min: 46.8 / Avg: 163.6 / Max: 187.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 1080 TiGTX 1080RTX 2080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 52.2 / Avg: 211.84 / Max: 320.9Min: 71.3 / Avg: 185.89 / Max: 249.7Min: 50 / Avg: 183.11 / Max: 341.1Min: 47.6 / Avg: 177.11 / Max: 285.3Min: 44.1 / Avg: 157.87 / Max: 210.2Min: 47.2 / Avg: 146.22 / Max: 188.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080RTX 2080 TiGTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 51.7 / Avg: 242.51 / Max: 313.1Min: 48.1 / Avg: 223.76 / Max: 283.3Min: 51 / Avg: 219.66 / Max: 332.2Min: 90.8 / Avg: 194.86 / Max: 239.8Min: 43.7 / Avg: 168.53 / Max: 201.8Min: 46.8 / Avg: 160.44 / Max: 192

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorRTX 2080 TiGTX 1080 TiRTX 2080GTX 1080GTX 1070GTX 1070 Ti60120180240300Min: 50.2 / Avg: 270.5 / Max: 342.3Min: 51.2 / Avg: 241.65 / Max: 309.7Min: 55.7 / Avg: 239.26 / Max: 287.8Min: 46.3 / Avg: 198.19 / Max: 236.2Min: 54.1 / Avg: 170.77 / Max: 203.5Min: 58.5 / Avg: 162.02 / Max: 191

59 Results Shown

GPU Temperature Monitor:
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring:
    Celsius
    Watts
CUDA Mini-Nbody
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing:
  Performance / Cost - OpenCL - Texture Read Bandwidth
  Performance / Cost - Copy
  OpenCL - Texture Read Bandwidth
  Copy
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing
cl-mem
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing:
  OpenCL - FFT SP
  OpenCL - MD5 Hash
SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing:
  Performance / Cost - OpenCL - MD5 Hash
  Integer Compute INT
  Performance / Cost - Integer Compute INT
  ResNet-50, FP16
  ResNet-50, FP32
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  AlexNet, FP16
  AlexNet, FP32
  Googlenet, FP16
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  Inception v4, FP16
  VGG-16, FP16
  VGG-16, FP32
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  ResNet-50, FP32
  AlexNet, FP32
  Googlenet, FP16
  Inception v4, FP16
  VGG-16, FP16
  VGG-16, FP32
LuxMark
LuxMark:
  Performance / Cost - GPU - Luxball HDR
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
  GPU Temp Monitor
Chaos Group V-RAY
clpeak:
  Kernel Latency
  Performance / Cost - Kernel Latency
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor