AMD 5th Gen EPYC "Turin" and Intel Xeon 6980P Granite Rapids benchmarks by Michael Larabel. Extracted view for easier comparison of latest AMD EPYC and Intel Xeon CPUs.
Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Processor: Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Intel AvenueCity v0.01 (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 768GB, Disk: 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 + 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10002f0Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: BHI_DIS_S + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 Changed Disk to 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 .
Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Changed Processor to 2 x Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (256 Cores / 512 Threads) .
Changed Memory to 1520GB .
Changed Disk to 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92 .
Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Changed Motherboard to Intel BIRCHSTREAM (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS) .
Changed Disk to 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 .
Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Security Change: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
EPYC 9755 Processor: AMD EPYC 9755 128-Core @ 2.70GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads)Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS)Chipset: AMD Device 153aMemory: 12 x 64GB DDR5-6000MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKCDisk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb002110Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
EPYC 9755 2P Changed Processor to 2 x AMD EPYC 9755 128-Core @ 2.70GHz (256 Cores / 512 Threads) .
Changed Memory to 1520GB .
Changed Disk to Samsung SSD 980 500GB + 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92 .
EPYC 9965 Changed Processor to AMD EPYC 9965 192-Core @ 2.25GHz (192 Cores / 384 Threads) .
Changed Memory to 12 x 64GB DDR5-6000MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKC .
Changed Disk to 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92 .
Processor Change: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb101018
EPYC 9965 2P Changed Processor to 2 x AMD EPYC 9965 192-Core @ 2.25GHz (384 Cores / 768 Threads) .
Changed Memory to 1520GB .
EPYC 9575F Changed Processor to AMD EPYC 9575F 64-Core @ 3.30GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads) .
Changed Memory to 12 x 64GB DDR5-6000MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKC .
EPYC 9575F 2P Changed Processor to 2 x AMD EPYC 9575F 64-Core @ 3.30GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads) .
Changed Memory to 1520GB .
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 14.41 7.37 19.36 9.43 27.34 13.12 60.33 57.04 52.81 50.33 MIN: 7.64 / MAX: 27.7 MIN: 5.89 / MAX: 20.48 MIN: 9.99 / MAX: 44.41 MIN: 7.81 / MAX: 38.18 MIN: 12.36 / MAX: 71.03 MIN: 9.23 / MAX: 66.32 MIN: 38.43 / MAX: 261.34 MIN: 37.85 / MAX: 326.3 MIN: 36.91 / MAX: 122.76 MIN: 37.22 / MAX: 109.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.45 / Avg: 317.41 / Max: 342.31 Min: 44.81 / Avg: 372.19 / Max: 403.45 Min: 38.83 / Avg: 333.62 / Max: 367.72 Min: 50.4 / Avg: 451.83 / Max: 524.72 Min: 52.56 / Avg: 451.13 / Max: 529.9 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 20420 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 24192 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 21797 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 30875 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 30978 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 SE +/- 3.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 141.43 268.30 193.80 399.96 231.14 483.81 1054.42 1071.81 545.57 560.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
Memcached Memcached is a high performance, distributed memory object caching system. This Memcached test profiles makes use of memtier_benchmark for excuting this CPU/memory-focused server benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 30489.72, N = 3 SE +/- 118290.86, N = 3 SE +/- 136953.60, N = 3 SE +/- 5635.45, N = 3 SE +/- 70542.57, N = 3 SE +/- 95423.55, N = 3 SE +/- 10219.58, N = 3 SE +/- 21107.34, N = 3 SE +/- 13783.64, N = 3 SE +/- 37824.28, N = 4 13808558.42 13967328.20 13316660.10 13914824.32 9290017.46 8954640.15 1959201.17 1931166.09 3122810.84 3064341.26 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre Ops/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 39869.27 37790.62 35232.59 10606.19 9868.67 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 346.35 / Max: 401.98 Min: 44.51 / Avg: 352.38 / Max: 408.97 Min: 37.87 / Avg: 263.68 / Max: 306.26 Min: 49.18 / Avg: 294.43 / Max: 347.68 Min: 50.57 / Avg: 310.51 / Max: 364.64 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 24244 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 24549 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 18545 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 21003 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 22124 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.24 2.18 5.62 2.82 7.52 3.64 14.51 14.19 13.16 13.04 MIN: 2.44 / MAX: 17.14 MIN: 1.63 / MAX: 14.11 MIN: 2.01 / MAX: 29.21 MIN: 1.97 / MAX: 26.07 MIN: 2.58 / MAX: 42.98 MIN: 2.17 / MAX: 43.33 MIN: 10.91 / MAX: 126.72 MIN: 11.14 / MAX: 123.21 MIN: 11.96 / MAX: 44.38 MIN: 12 / MAX: 44.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.44 / Avg: 333.22 / Max: 357.44 Min: 44.81 / Avg: 395.5 / Max: 423.47 Min: 38.76 / Avg: 373.23 / Max: 403.54 Min: 50.22 / Avg: 461.32 / Max: 532.12 Min: 56.41 / Avg: 462.01 / Max: 538.84 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 21326 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 25444 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 24135 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 30447 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 30493 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.54, N = 15 SE +/- 0.53, N = 12 SE +/- 1.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.40, N = 15 SE +/- 0.63, N = 6 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 49.09 25.64 87.14 37.25 149.81 60.96 62.30 61.49 47.05 43.82 MIN: 24.6 / MAX: 83.47 MIN: 22.49 / MAX: 58.71 MIN: 35.35 / MAX: 200.15 MIN: 27.7 / MAX: 102.96 MIN: 54.22 / MAX: 226.99 MIN: 33.89 / MAX: 181.53 MIN: 30.34 / MAX: 380.81 MIN: 30.56 / MAX: 381.35 MIN: 31.24 / MAX: 91.93 MIN: 28.4 / MAX: 92.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.65 / Avg: 371.7 / Max: 400.78 Min: 44.83 / Avg: 386.55 / Max: 442.75 Min: 38.53 / Avg: 358.08 / Max: 413.76 Min: 49.9 / Avg: 377.27 / Max: 417.38 Min: 51.1 / Avg: 403.73 / Max: 451.34 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 24160 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 25358 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 23872 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 25025 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 26781 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 5.04, N = 3 SE +/- 43.03, N = 3 SE +/- 13.14, N = 3 SE +/- 16.35, N = 3 SE +/- 6.08, N = 3 SE +/- 5.67, N = 3 SE +/- 443.75, N = 3 SE +/- 146.17, N = 3 SE +/- 105.63, N = 3 SE +/- 39.06, N = 3 13533.20 28070.85 18679.36 40729.82 22159.64 48830.29 72221.47 72116.63 43376.11 43386.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
RELION RELION - REgularised LIkelihood OptimisatioN - is a stand-alone computer program for Maximum A Posteriori refinement of (multiple) 3D reconstructions or 2D class averages in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). It is developed in the research group of Sjors Scheres at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 4.0.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.85, N = 9 SE +/- 0.94, N = 15 SE +/- 3.21, N = 12 SE +/- 19.25, N = 12 SE +/- 1.14, N = 5 SE +/- 1.34, N = 3 SE +/- 2.60, N = 10 SE +/- 1.59, N = 12 223.81 119.04 169.70 44.39 105.45 101.56 154.69 153.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++11 -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng -ljpeg -lmpi_cxx -lmpi CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RELION 4.0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.25 / Avg: 389.21 / Max: 399.75 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 375.69 / Max: 395.47 Min: 49.44 / Avg: 473.85 / Max: 540.64 Min: 50.38 / Avg: 473.69 / Max: 540.56 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 88092 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 64869 Joules per run. 3. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 75105 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 74528 Joules per run.
Pennant Pennant is an application focused on hydrodynamics on general unstructured meshes in 2D. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.034501, N = 6 SE +/- 0.040538, N = 15 SE +/- 0.073388, N = 15 SE +/- 0.020936, N = 15 SE +/- 0.046313, N = 15 SE +/- 0.017552, N = 15 SE +/- 0.001234, N = 3 SE +/- 0.007459, N = 3 SE +/- 0.014420, N = 4 SE +/- 0.029559, N = 4 6.221108 3.331298 4.393606 2.329222 3.806965 2.036223 6.449588 6.437402 8.968728 9.151189 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.18 / Avg: 248.27 / Max: 399.65 Min: 44.51 / Avg: 248.94 / Max: 471.46 Min: 37.86 / Avg: 197.44 / Max: 381.39 Min: 45.95 / Avg: 308.83 / Max: 535.66 Min: 50.54 / Avg: 318.84 / Max: 537.88 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2731 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2539 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 2198 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 5559 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 5978 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.1643 0.3286 0.4929 0.6572 0.8215 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 0.25 0.17 0.48 0.19 0.73 0.23 0.45 0.45 0.60 0.60 MIN: 0.11 / MAX: 18.43 MIN: 0.15 / MAX: 24.84 MIN: 0.13 / MAX: 26.24 MIN: 0.17 / MAX: 37.73 MIN: 0.14 / MAX: 57.97 MIN: 0.19 / MAX: 56.57 MIN: 0.22 / MAX: 100.75 MIN: 0.24 / MAX: 62.73 MIN: 0.21 / MAX: 30.59 MIN: 0.22 / MAX: 25.88 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 38.66 / Avg: 308.17 / Max: 330.53 Min: 45.01 / Avg: 337.44 / Max: 363.58 Min: 38.73 / Avg: 328.37 / Max: 358 Min: 50.42 / Avg: 246.22 / Max: 266.54 Min: 51.09 / Avg: 257.75 / Max: 276.01 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 19825 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 21821 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 21344 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 16168 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 16754 Joules per run.
GPAW GPAW is a density-functional theory (DFT) Python code based on the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method and the atomic simulation environment (ASE). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GPAW 23.6 Input: Carbon Nanotube EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 29.87 20.76 23.82 26.79 27.56 42.10 88.84 87.51 30.42 30.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -lxc -lblas -lmpi CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GPAW 23.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 351.78 / Max: 400.01 Min: 44.6 / Avg: 396.62 / Max: 491.51 Min: 38.14 / Avg: 324.56 / Max: 416.87 Min: 50.35 / Avg: 386.97 / Max: 532.61 Min: 51.11 / Avg: 393.06 / Max: 538.23 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 12195 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 11899 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 11792 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15608 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15984 Joules per run.
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400000M 800000M 1200000M 1600000M 2000000M SE +/- 312635540.30, N = 3 SE +/- 486927595.20, N = 3 SE +/- 89801965.81, N = 3 SE +/- 1316278570.88, N = 3 SE +/- 170992251.22, N = 3 SE +/- 1185055409.91, N = 3 SE +/- 774711882.62, N = 3 SE +/- 541993763.93, N = 3 SE +/- 174944331.36, N = 3 SE +/- 49597283.94, N = 3 499260152310 986027493060 807009841427 1605650870013 1053141452663 2097034161397 986701602043 983054661587 497763896250 497225043487 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 500M 1000M 1500M 2000M 2500M 1303373595.94 1746071268.12 2506574135.73 1015831691.63 1013880039.90 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.33 / Avg: 383.05 / Max: 400.78 Min: 44.65 / Avg: 462.19 / Max: 498.95 Min: 38.76 / Avg: 420.15 / Max: 459.21 Min: 50.94 / Avg: 490.01 / Max: 540.48 Min: 51.48 / Avg: 490.42 / Max: 540.5 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 70099 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 84580 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 77028 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 90161 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 90073 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 700000M 1400000M 2100000M 2800000M 3500000M SE +/- 24295011.71, N = 3 SE +/- 407580545.71, N = 3 SE +/- 507390352.95, N = 3 SE +/- 600986542.59, N = 3 SE +/- 312050224.99, N = 3 SE +/- 1021635899.00, N = 3 SE +/- 719739801.83, N = 3 SE +/- 527088585.29, N = 3 SE +/- 114312823.74, N = 3 SE +/- 288670768.28, N = 3 733060286053 1449060633350 1186359294450 2360488961000 1551003421237 3077388465143 1505124917340 1492693900400 761960960000 760875022490 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: ChaCha20 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 800M 1600M 2400M 3200M 4000M 1908650939.88 2532659749.39 3660529028.05 1552821305.41 1552456968.84 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.64 / Avg: 384.07 / Max: 401.18 Min: 44.99 / Avg: 468.42 / Max: 500.98 Min: 38.47 / Avg: 423.71 / Max: 461.59 Min: 50.59 / Avg: 490.69 / Max: 541.01 Min: 50.42 / Avg: 490.11 / Max: 540.52 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 70413 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 85566 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 77539 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 90124 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 90180 Joules per run.
ClickHouse ClickHouse is an open-source, high performance OLAP data management system. This test profile uses ClickHouse's standard benchmark recommendations per https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/operations/performance-test/ / https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/tree/main/clickhouse with the 100 million rows web analytics dataset. The reported value is the query processing time using the geometric mean of all separate queries performed as an aggregate. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.67, N = 3 SE +/- 3.39, N = 3 SE +/- 6.12, N = 3 SE +/- 4.93, N = 3 SE +/- 3.03, N = 3 SE +/- 5.12, N = 5 SE +/- 1.91, N = 3 SE +/- 2.77, N = 3 SE +/- 3.78, N = 6 SE +/- 4.86, N = 4 779.31 813.30 698.12 630.88 576.76 495.84 200.21 201.39 408.98 435.36 MIN: 66.01 / MAX: 7500 MIN: 101.18 / MAX: 7500 MIN: 80.86 / MAX: 6666.67 MIN: 109.89 / MAX: 6000 MIN: 89.55 / MAX: 5454.55 MIN: 106.95 / MAX: 5454.55 MIN: 31.35 / MAX: 2727.27 MIN: 30.35 / MAX: 2857.14 MIN: 66.74 / MAX: 4615.38 MIN: 62.24 / MAX: 5454.55
NAS Parallel Benchmarks NPB, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, is a benchmark developed by NASA for high-end computer systems. This test profile currently uses the MPI version of NPB. This test profile offers selecting the different NPB tests/problems and varying problem sizes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 1509.34, N = 15 SE +/- 877.21, N = 9 SE +/- 1302.88, N = 15 SE +/- 3807.41, N = 15 SE +/- 2066.13, N = 15 SE +/- 6961.73, N = 13 SE +/- 361.11, N = 3 SE +/- 965.50, N = 3 SE +/- 890.04, N = 6 SE +/- 794.43, N = 7 159641.78 301867.19 167026.93 361767.36 112588.99 223715.54 387445.06 451798.00 196892.69 240025.24 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.6 Total Mop/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 300 600 900 1200 1500 1247.11 1197.56 791.79 1339.29 1510.91 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.14 / Avg: 128.01 / Max: 396.02 Min: 44.37 / Avg: 139.47 / Max: 413.95 Min: 37.89 / Avg: 142.19 / Max: 373.94 Min: 44.11 / Avg: 147.01 / Max: 404.55 Min: 50.22 / Avg: 158.86 / Max: 390.81 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 751 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 967 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1138 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 1519 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 1634 Joules per run.
OSPRay Studio Intel OSPRay Studio is an open-source, interactive visualization and ray-tracing software package. OSPRay Studio makes use of Intel OSPRay, a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 25.41, N = 3 SE +/- 17.64, N = 3 SE +/- 39.68, N = 3 SE +/- 6.94, N = 3 SE +/- 21.39, N = 3 SE +/- 12.66, N = 3 SE +/- 28.11, N = 3 SE +/- 38.35, N = 3 SE +/- 63.14, N = 3 SE +/- 104.51, N = 3 35274 17476 20379 10551 17091 8816 12346 12139 23066 23664 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.49 / Avg: 307.84 / Max: 401.18 Min: 44.85 / Avg: 385.39 / Max: 463.91 Min: 38.26 / Avg: 316.11 / Max: 391.91 Min: 50.45 / Avg: 415.19 / Max: 538.48 Min: 51.48 / Avg: 419.61 / Max: 540.64 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 13750 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 28904 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 20969 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 35983 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 37065 Joules per run.
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1.4M 2.8M 4.2M 5.6M 7M SE +/- 743.25, N = 3 SE +/- 5325.83, N = 3 SE +/- 331.00, N = 3 SE +/- 1167.12, N = 3 SE +/- 310.57, N = 3 SE +/- 802.37, N = 3 SE +/- 14072.49, N = 3 SE +/- 24537.19, N = 3 SE +/- 4880.80, N = 3 SE +/- 1206.94, N = 3 1673091.2 3309080.7 2755042.3 5492173.3 3351713.3 6677303.9 4477263.6 4461756.7 2287497.6 2273970.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl verify/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 4395.32 6287.44 8963.31 4663.94 4639.42 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.51 / Avg: 380.65 / Max: 400.78 Min: 44.93 / Avg: 438.18 / Max: 477.98 Min: 38.29 / Avg: 373.94 / Max: 396.88 Min: 43.46 / Avg: 490.46 / Max: 537.78 Min: 45.25 / Avg: 490.14 / Max: 538.89 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 116607 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 135106 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 116045 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 152371 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 152270 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100000M 200000M 300000M 400000M 500000M SE +/- 38504291.58, N = 3 SE +/- 192541977.47, N = 3 SE +/- 76407988.26, N = 3 SE +/- 666929568.64, N = 3 SE +/- 865484415.00, N = 3 SE +/- 168761402.92, N = 3 SE +/- 1048707846.36, N = 3 SE +/- 296061237.33, N = 3 SE +/- 208435661.63, N = 3 SE +/- 182381368.83, N = 3 113637325283 224800807873 186660393313 370780418480 223613640290 450711580337 300485773490 299610746847 153362715637 152704659163 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA256 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 130M 260M 390M 520M 650M 295380807.41 401864487.87 591912038.17 312750573.92 311566125.07 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.53 / Avg: 384.71 / Max: 400.78 Min: 44.83 / Avg: 464.49 / Max: 492.11 Min: 38.4 / Avg: 377.78 / Max: 402 Min: 50.79 / Avg: 490.37 / Max: 540.47 Min: 50.77 / Avg: 490.12 / Max: 539.97 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 70531 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 84846 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 69134 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 90064 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 90019 Joules per run.
QuantLib QuantLib is an open-source library/framework around quantitative finance for modeling, trading and risk management scenarios. QuantLib is written in C++ with Boost and its built-in benchmark used reports the QuantLib Benchmark Index benchmark score. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Multi-Threaded EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 661.19, N = 3 SE +/- 1560.77, N = 3 SE +/- 401.79, N = 3 SE +/- 706.04, N = 3 SE +/- 485.45, N = 3 SE +/- 337.83, N = 3 SE +/- 6898.59, N = 3 SE +/- 5872.24, N = 3 SE +/- 1975.23, N = 3 SE +/- 3274.43, N = 3 297665.1 595444.6 465436.8 943189.3 566481.4 1173942.2 851172.5 852757.7 431602.4 421964.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fPIE -pie MFLOPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Multi-Threaded EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 300 600 900 1200 1500 897.44 1146.37 1606.22 945.41 919.86 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.32 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.52 / Avg: 331.68 / Max: 399.38 Min: 44.39 / Avg: 406.01 / Max: 482.98 Min: 37.88 / Avg: 352.68 / Max: 387.81 Min: 44 / Avg: 456.53 / Max: 542.18 Min: 45.66 / Avg: 458.73 / Max: 541.01 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 15479 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 23819 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 25275 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 27087 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 27829 Joules per run.
John The Ripper This is a benchmark of John The Ripper, which is a password cracker. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 630.47, N = 3 SE +/- 7688.38, N = 3 SE +/- 1201.85, N = 3 SE +/- 33780.81, N = 14 SE +/- 2333.33, N = 3 SE +/- 25253.17, N = 15 SE +/- 23067.53, N = 3 SE +/- 9291.57, N = 3 SE +/- 2201.98, N = 3 SE +/- 3153.44, N = 3 857702 1667667 1361333 2560000 1774667 3374133 1686667 1719000 925672 907937 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2 Real C/S Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: WPA PSK EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 2539.28 3396.83 4459.57 2083.45 2046.21 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.71 / Avg: 337.77 / Max: 381.17 Min: 44.91 / Avg: 400.77 / Max: 455.82 Min: 38.3 / Avg: 397.95 / Max: 449.62 Min: 51 / Avg: 444.3 / Max: 536.53 Min: 51.12 / Avg: 443.72 / Max: 539.69 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 11372 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 13626 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 13530 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15402 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15086 Joules per run.
OSPRay Studio Intel OSPRay Studio is an open-source, interactive visualization and ray-tracing software package. OSPRay Studio makes use of Intel OSPRay, a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 11.14, N = 3 SE +/- 46.88, N = 3 SE +/- 32.92, N = 3 SE +/- 13.58, N = 3 SE +/- 14.95, N = 3 SE +/- 40.51, N = 3 SE +/- 51.00, N = 3 SE +/- 31.95, N = 3 SE +/- 65.17, N = 3 SE +/- 213.42, N = 3 41324 20748 23981 12482 20149 10522 14521 14507 31924 32247 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.45 / Avg: 318.98 / Max: 401.18 Min: 44.74 / Avg: 395.07 / Max: 468.24 Min: 38.35 / Avg: 324.34 / Max: 392.86 Min: 50.62 / Avg: 340.37 / Max: 539.47 Min: 53.63 / Avg: 343.33 / Max: 540.37 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 16374 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 34108 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 24542 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15317 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15564 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 5.52 3.08 7.22 4.03 8.63 5.22 12.06 11.92 11.30 11.08 MIN: 3.58 / MAX: 12.72 MIN: 2.66 / MAX: 11.27 MIN: 4.48 / MAX: 26.34 MIN: 3.15 / MAX: 22.43 MIN: 4.74 / MAX: 37.97 MIN: 3.43 / MAX: 46.15 MIN: 9.4 / MAX: 163.59 MIN: 9.31 / MAX: 107.51 MIN: 10.34 / MAX: 55.87 MIN: 9.64 / MAX: 39 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.63 / Avg: 297.78 / Max: 322.37 Min: 45.18 / Avg: 355.67 / Max: 388.83 Min: 38.67 / Avg: 350.2 / Max: 386.55 Min: 50.86 / Avg: 445.96 / Max: 535.27 Min: 51.27 / Avg: 448.22 / Max: 538.68 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 19256 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 23118 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 23230 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 31069 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 31077 Joules per run.
ClickHouse ClickHouse is an open-source, high performance OLAP data management system. This test profile uses ClickHouse's standard benchmark recommendations per https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/operations/performance-test/ / https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/tree/main/clickhouse with the 100 million rows web analytics dataset. The reported value is the query processing time using the geometric mean of all separate queries performed as an aggregate. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Second Run EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.75, N = 3 SE +/- 7.04, N = 3 SE +/- 5.27, N = 3 SE +/- 11.12, N = 3 SE +/- 4.38, N = 3 SE +/- 4.02, N = 5 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 SE +/- 2.70, N = 3 SE +/- 4.34, N = 6 SE +/- 0.85, N = 4 809.27 836.47 729.56 651.59 587.17 508.00 213.64 213.72 410.44 435.75 MIN: 65.65 / MAX: 8571.43 MIN: 99.01 / MAX: 7500 MIN: 81.63 / MAX: 7500 MIN: 119.05 / MAX: 7500 MIN: 92.02 / MAX: 6000 MIN: 105.26 / MAX: 6000 MIN: 33.5 / MAX: 3333.33 MIN: 40.82 / MAX: 3529.41 MIN: 69.77 / MAX: 4615.38 MIN: 69.77 / MAX: 4615.38
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1100000M 2200000M 3300000M 4400000M 5500000M SE +/- 1089753853.94, N = 3 SE +/- 2634552471.04, N = 3 SE +/- 679943093.73, N = 3 SE +/- 1040145141.77, N = 3 SE +/- 1643367333.46, N = 3 SE +/- 4994077850.51, N = 3 SE +/- 266676472.30, N = 3 SE +/- 2441895768.49, N = 3 SE +/- 316862649.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1079468156.27, N = 3 1289299058233 2543233234713 2007365351470 3997224330763 2512760030913 5020136271053 3878078355230 3839570315567 1964597309167 1967069409960 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1400M 2800M 4200M 5600M 7000M 3601051103.71 4699217928.95 6477196397.29 4012206294.35 4013205956.76 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.03 / Avg: 358.03 / Max: 377.9 Min: 44.65 / Avg: 427.17 / Max: 447.2 Min: 38.48 / Avg: 387.94 / Max: 419.83 Min: 50.48 / Avg: 489.66 / Max: 539.94 Min: 50.8 / Avg: 490.15 / Max: 540.48 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 65640 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 78030 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 70993 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 90097 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 90187 Joules per run.
ClickHouse ClickHouse is an open-source, high performance OLAP data management system. This test profile uses ClickHouse's standard benchmark recommendations per https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/operations/performance-test/ / https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/tree/main/clickhouse with the 100 million rows web analytics dataset. The reported value is the query processing time using the geometric mean of all separate queries performed as an aggregate. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.25, N = 3 SE +/- 3.24, N = 3 SE +/- 4.70, N = 3 SE +/- 8.02, N = 3 SE +/- 2.05, N = 3 SE +/- 3.66, N = 5 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 SE +/- 4.00, N = 3 SE +/- 3.00, N = 6 SE +/- 3.43, N = 4 809.87 839.18 724.64 652.64 598.32 510.42 217.72 217.88 415.77 439.81 MIN: 65.43 / MAX: 10000 MIN: 100 / MAX: 8571.43 MIN: 85.11 / MAX: 6666.67 MIN: 118.81 / MAX: 6666.67 MIN: 91.19 / MAX: 6000 MIN: 106.95 / MAX: 6000 MIN: 40.16 / MAX: 3157.89 MIN: 38.36 / MAX: 3529.41 MIN: 66.23 / MAX: 4615.38 MIN: 68.42 / MAX: 4285.71 Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean Per Watt, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, Third Run EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.997 1.994 2.991 3.988 4.985 4.181 4.431 4.202 2.946 2.909 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.27 / Avg: 193.7 / Max: 368.01 Min: 44.35 / Avg: 163.53 / Max: 407.01 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 142.39 / Max: 305.34 Min: 44.92 / Avg: 141.1 / Max: 386.84 Min: 50 / Avg: 151.17 / Max: 408.34 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 24083 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 23820 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 23304 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 28408 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 30006 Joules per run.
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40000M 80000M 120000M 160000M 200000M SE +/- 40355477.92, N = 3 SE +/- 408187321.46, N = 3 SE +/- 163780192.60, N = 3 SE +/- 587265222.90, N = 3 SE +/- 148724346.57, N = 3 SE +/- 994539915.11, N = 3 SE +/- 299324452.10, N = 3 SE +/- 123095714.53, N = 3 SE +/- 57519653.73, N = 3 SE +/- 73765633.28, N = 3 45568081887 89447493313 72359767240 144565915787 87509206173 174898831913 106427384107 105711340873 54542420633 54221405820 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: SHA512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M 118475697.80 161764658.87 235679194.64 111142075.02 110629528.53 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.56 / Avg: 384.62 / Max: 400.85 Min: 45.02 / Avg: 447.32 / Max: 471.81 Min: 38.47 / Avg: 371.31 / Max: 391.68 Min: 51.04 / Avg: 490.75 / Max: 541.18 Min: 51.17 / Avg: 490.12 / Max: 539.94 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 70385 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 81710 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 68073 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 90134 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 90182 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1000000M 2000000M 3000000M 4000000M 5000000M SE +/- 947677989.11, N = 3 SE +/- 1571769645.17, N = 3 SE +/- 2482404044.78, N = 3 SE +/- 2226119209.67, N = 3 SE +/- 3767964201.90, N = 3 SE +/- 8412722229.77, N = 3 SE +/- 4180336382.73, N = 3 SE +/- 1646468976.45, N = 3 SE +/- 2243461518.91, N = 3 SE +/- 654108493.84, N = 3 1193699244990 2362782398327 1837765850747 3665896592633 2283280593023 4559805602510 3100362577873 3112294646850 1568111085887 1563790529240 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1300M 2600M 3900M 5200M 6500M 3325699800.96 4339501704.86 5989469249.57 3197057120.80 3186709263.24 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.35 / Avg: 358.93 / Max: 382.78 Min: 44.7 / Avg: 423.5 / Max: 443.31 Min: 38.44 / Avg: 381.22 / Max: 412.53 Min: 50.69 / Avg: 490.49 / Max: 539.96 Min: 51.17 / Avg: 490.72 / Max: 540.43 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 65685 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 77500 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 69763 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 90086 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 90129 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.3 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 116.72, N = 3 SE +/- 423.09, N = 3 SE +/- 15.58, N = 3 SE +/- 144.60, N = 3 SE +/- 46.31, N = 3 SE +/- 127.23, N = 3 SE +/- 758.12, N = 3 SE +/- 848.75, N = 3 SE +/- 411.55, N = 3 SE +/- 349.61, N = 3 45479.7 90453.6 69037.7 138159.1 85251.0 170588.7 122616.3 122000.7 62151.5 61894.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 12.01, N = 3 SE +/- 13.54, N = 3 SE +/- 8.58, N = 3 SE +/- 16.96, N = 3 SE +/- 20.79, N = 3 SE +/- 47.09, N = 3 SE +/- 50.72, N = 3 SE +/- 26.87, N = 3 SE +/- 3.46, N = 3 SE +/- 10.44, N = 3 5717.19 10360.94 8730.88 15858.87 11033.61 18367.74 21076.39 21314.01 11295.66 11530.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
RocksDB This is a benchmark of Meta/Facebook's RocksDB as an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage based on Google's LevelDB. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M SE +/- 1563552.18, N = 3 SE +/- 2912959.89, N = 3 SE +/- 5260460.78, N = 3 SE +/- 3614882.10, N = 3 SE +/- 1700402.40, N = 3 SE +/- 20058665.84, N = 5 SE +/- 6485473.88, N = 3 SE +/- 22025814.96, N = 15 SE +/- 2092957.08, N = 3 SE +/- 15289875.69, N = 15 505733525 1003978325 786896580 1573803038 958354064 1881560684 1403285563 1353034879 734025723 675346299 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better RocksDB 9.0 Test: Random Read EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K 1462898.91 1894471.54 2704939.66 1557954.63 1430621.07 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RocksDB 9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 345.71 / Max: 371.14 Min: 44.54 / Avg: 415.36 / Max: 446.18 Min: 38.02 / Avg: 354.3 / Max: 379.97 Min: 49.52 / Avg: 471.15 / Max: 541.05 Min: 51.05 / Avg: 472.07 / Max: 541.17 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22125 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 26583 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 22675 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 30310 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 30212 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 45.20, N = 3 SE +/- 52.70, N = 3 SE +/- 0.83, N = 3 SE +/- 46.18, N = 3 SE +/- 31.19, N = 3 SE +/- 15.50, N = 3 SE +/- 61.32, N = 3 SE +/- 50.12, N = 3 SE +/- 15.69, N = 3 SE +/- 4.85, N = 3 21512.07 45286.36 31655.57 67364.91 37263.74 79719.20 45630.30 45797.09 25053.26 25053.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OSPRay Studio Intel OSPRay Studio is an open-source, interactive visualization and ray-tracing software package. OSPRay Studio makes use of Intel OSPRay, a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 28.92, N = 3 SE +/- 22.81, N = 3 SE +/- 14.19, N = 3 SE +/- 5.04, N = 3 SE +/- 10.12, N = 3 SE +/- 4.58, N = 3 SE +/- 27.39, N = 3 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 SE +/- 26.96, N = 3 SE +/- 37.03, N = 3 19196 10412 11982 6225 10067 5206 7293 7208 13760 14034 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 341.83 / Max: 401.18 Min: 44.72 / Avg: 371.8 / Max: 469.86 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 301.98 / Max: 391.18 Min: 50.58 / Avg: 426.55 / Max: 539.48 Min: 52.9 / Avg: 428.6 / Max: 542.32 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 23814 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 22928 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 16810 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 42939 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 43575 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 SE +/- 6.06, N = 3 SE +/- 3.71, N = 3 SE +/- 7.13, N = 3 SE +/- 7.81, N = 3 SE +/- 17.40, N = 3 SE +/- 7.55, N = 3 SE +/- 24.33, N = 3 SE +/- 13.57, N = 3 SE +/- 60.24, N = 3 16174 8742 10154 5265 8530 4429 6189 6073 11528 11720 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.51 / Avg: 333.64 / Max: 401.18 Min: 44.74 / Avg: 358.18 / Max: 462.19 Min: 38.27 / Avg: 335.19 / Max: 391.66 Min: 50.13 / Avg: 384.99 / Max: 538.78 Min: 54.43 / Avg: 389.52 / Max: 540.84 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 20241 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 19580 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 30725 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 24639 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 25189 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.19, N = 3 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 1015 552 639 333 535 278 395 389 723 735 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.5 / Avg: 337.6 / Max: 401.19 Min: 44.79 / Avg: 371.81 / Max: 463.5 Min: 38.18 / Avg: 311.51 / Max: 391.44 Min: 50.04 / Avg: 392.21 / Max: 538.08 Min: 50.86 / Avg: 393.04 / Max: 539.77 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22394 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 23548 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 19418 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 26147 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 26071 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 1203 655 753 395 632 331 463 460 862 876 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.3 / Avg: 339.6 / Max: 400.77 Min: 44.84 / Avg: 373.57 / Max: 459.86 Min: 38.32 / Avg: 312.75 / Max: 391.11 Min: 50.29 / Avg: 393.5 / Max: 537.03 Min: 54.28 / Avg: 395.82 / Max: 538.42 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22979 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 24158 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 19912 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 26627 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 26652 Joules per run.
Speedb Speedb is a next-generation key value storage engine that is RocksDB compatible and aiming for stability, efficiency, and performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Read EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M SE +/- 755684.49, N = 3 SE +/- 3250600.68, N = 3 SE +/- 707549.54, N = 3 SE +/- 5308547.71, N = 3 SE +/- 370648.73, N = 3 SE +/- 3248798.82, N = 3 SE +/- 31475546.69, N = 15 SE +/- 4617898.31, N = 3 SE +/- 1257570.05, N = 3 SE +/- 3885781.01, N = 3 526671792 1041051208 822102828 1562695431 969890739 1903557721 1413177491 1473705641 770071573 761457970 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Read EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K 1520207.33 1969975.35 2712772.81 1634064.97 1616258.76 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Speedb 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 346.45 / Max: 371.33 Min: 45.34 / Avg: 417.32 / Max: 445.74 Min: 38.22 / Avg: 357.53 / Max: 383.56 Min: 49.92 / Avg: 471.26 / Max: 540.53 Min: 51.32 / Avg: 471.12 / Max: 541 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22173 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 26708 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 22882 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 30318 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 30152 Joules per run.
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 38.21 19.47 24.00 12.32 20.31 10.61 15.82 15.65 28.85 29.30 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.29 / Avg: 349.84 / Max: 389.2 Min: 44.79 / Avg: 395.56 / Max: 467.14 Min: 38.01 / Avg: 322.01 / Max: 389.81 Min: 49.69 / Avg: 433.41 / Max: 540.25 Min: 51.27 / Avg: 437.26 / Max: 541.3 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 14927 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 11339 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 7943 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 14447 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 14867 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Noise Suppression Poconet-Like FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 15 SE +/- 0.64, N = 15 SE +/- 0.47, N = 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 8.38 9.89 10.73 11.21 10.88 12.84 29.61 30.02 12.97 12.92 MIN: 5.82 / MAX: 17.02 MIN: 6.81 / MAX: 38.21 MIN: 6.4 / MAX: 32.23 MIN: 7.52 / MAX: 54.87 MIN: 6.04 / MAX: 54.33 MIN: 8.07 / MAX: 115.33 MIN: 7.03 / MAX: 321.65 MIN: 6.85 / MAX: 313.69 MIN: 6.82 / MAX: 55.85 MIN: 7.06 / MAX: 56.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.45 / Avg: 345.02 / Max: 376.01 Min: 44.91 / Avg: 397.17 / Max: 438.79 Min: 39.1 / Avg: 359.69 / Max: 403.1 Min: 51.41 / Avg: 409.23 / Max: 468.4 Min: 51.35 / Avg: 428.39 / Max: 498.15 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22542 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 26478 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 24579 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 28646 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 29845 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 12.36, N = 3 SE +/- 11.53, N = 3 SE +/- 2.97, N = 3 SE +/- 7.61, N = 3 SE +/- 17.14, N = 3 SE +/- 16.93, N = 3 SE +/- 12.80, N = 3 SE +/- 8.06, N = 3 SE +/- 7.26, N = 3 SE +/- 21.55, N = 3 7427.27 14633.14 11232.26 22683.50 12591.54 26270.08 17592.41 17994.95 9720.53 9800.26 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
John The Ripper This is a benchmark of John The Ripper, which is a password cracker. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 41.32, N = 3 SE +/- 598.06, N = 3 SE +/- 53.35, N = 3 SE +/- 3529.91, N = 3 SE +/- 201.40, N = 3 SE +/- 8154.33, N = 4 SE +/- 5523.43, N = 4 SE +/- 5262.08, N = 3 SE +/- 280.31, N = 3 SE +/- 2952.36, N = 15 198954 386107 323010 609008 386082 693907 451601 479368 264265 256471 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2 Real C/S Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: Blowfish EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 562.77 778.22 1128.50 591.59 576.71 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P Xeon 6980P - DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 354.42 / Max: 400.47 Min: 44.63 / Avg: 415.07 / Max: 468.23 Min: 38.29 / Avg: 342.77 / Max: 386.49 Min: 50.75 / Avg: 445.3 / Max: 539.78 Min: 50.42 / Avg: 446.62 / Max: 539.55 Min: 51.81 / Avg: 446.7 / Max: 539.8 Min: 51.25 / Avg: 444.72 / Max: 540.41 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 12168 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 13974 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 11654 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15188 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15180 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 1.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 225.86 119.14 329.53 159.81 414.32 198.11 242.19 238.36 234.32 227.99 MIN: 200.68 / MAX: 255.85 MIN: 111.7 / MAX: 144.9 MIN: 165.13 / MAX: 354.63 MIN: 147.41 / MAX: 204.24 MIN: 173.52 / MAX: 443.02 MIN: 168.01 / MAX: 232.97 MIN: 155.74 / MAX: 682.88 MIN: 153.42 / MAX: 908.3 MIN: 180.69 / MAX: 1204.33 MIN: 160.06 / MAX: 683.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.43 / Avg: 348.41 / Max: 377.65 Min: 45.09 / Avg: 364.93 / Max: 401.2 Min: 38.45 / Avg: 337.5 / Max: 378.09 Min: 49.98 / Avg: 423.9 / Max: 505.35 Min: 56.14 / Avg: 429.46 / Max: 517.98 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22879 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 24572 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 23062 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 31086 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 31637 Joules per run.
Stockfish This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced open-source C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 1024 CPU threads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 16.1 Chess Benchmark EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 130M 260M 390M 520M 650M SE +/- 2577463.33, N = 15 SE +/- 3112562.99, N = 15 SE +/- 4338134.07, N = 15 SE +/- 7520081.68, N = 3 SE +/- 2768351.23, N = 3 SE +/- 4999906.85, N = 9 SE +/- 2910415.51, N = 15 SE +/- 5154575.31, N = 12 SE +/- 3585875.08, N = 15 SE +/- 4147707.14, N = 12 182135967 346550112 307343923 543944789 362007178 627203518 346175342 345790812 207794619 198271374 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -pedantic -O3 -funroll-loops -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -mbmi -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512vnni -mavx512dq -mavx512vl -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -flto-partition=one -flto=jobserver Nodes Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 16.1 Chess Benchmark EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K 490782.75 697627.07 931347.77 432909.23 413612.73 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 16.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.68 / Avg: 371.11 / Max: 401.18 Min: 44.77 / Avg: 440.56 / Max: 487.21 Min: 38.5 / Avg: 388.69 / Max: 420.82 Min: 51.7 / Avg: 480 / Max: 547.86 Min: 50.92 / Avg: 479.36 / Max: 541.75 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 24988 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 33424 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 35889 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 55808 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 53689 Joules per run.
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 45.75 23.46 29.75 15.37 25.67 13.47 20.58 19.95 37.12 37.76 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.3 / Avg: 356.28 / Max: 394.35 Min: 44.67 / Avg: 395 / Max: 457.96 Min: 38.33 / Avg: 319.91 / Max: 381.13 Min: 49.68 / Avg: 439.22 / Max: 539.91 Min: 51.16 / Avg: 441.6 / Max: 540.03 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 17814 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 13562 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 9704 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 18447 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 18842 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 138.36 75.34 86.62 46.90 74.24 41.00 66.26 65.54 113.27 114.81 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 378.85 / Max: 400.22 Min: 45.07 / Avg: 446.04 / Max: 487.04 Min: 38.24 / Avg: 365.97 / Max: 403.37 Min: 49.37 / Avg: 442.05 / Max: 541 Min: 52.29 / Avg: 465.5 / Max: 540.53 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 54175 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 40887 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 29277 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 56583 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 56481 Joules per run.
John The Ripper This is a benchmark of John The Ripper, which is a password cracker. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 77.93, N = 3 SE +/- 1075.92, N = 3 SE +/- 45.32, N = 3 SE +/- 3998.65, N = 3 SE +/- 8.33, N = 3 SE +/- 4115.57, N = 3 SE +/- 4966.19, N = 15 SE +/- 3581.87, N = 3 SE +/- 845.21, N = 3 SE +/- 3541.04, N = 3 199078 385382 323000 599893 386474 662940 443548 482948 265106 260166 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -lm -lrt -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2 Real C/S Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 2023.03.14 Test: bcrypt EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 561.71 782.32 1127.52 593.58 584.24
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 1.81, N = 3 SE +/- 5.52, N = 3 SE +/- 2.87, N = 3 SE +/- 31.92, N = 3 SE +/- 6.65, N = 3 SE +/- 3.16, N = 3 SE +/- 7.81, N = 3 SE +/- 25.95, N = 3 SE +/- 3.06, N = 3 SE +/- 2.03, N = 3 2198.48 4337.26 3287.43 6777.56 3497.17 7308.90 4209.65 4443.01 2421.94 2541.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
ASTC Encoder ASTC Encoder (astcenc) is for the Adaptive Scalable Texture Compression (ASTC) format commonly used with OpenGL, OpenGL ES, and Vulkan graphics APIs. This test profile does a coding test of both compression/decompression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Exhaustive EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.0055, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0598, N = 4 SE +/- 0.0004, N = 3 SE +/- 0.1679, N = 4 SE +/- 0.0016, N = 4 SE +/- 0.1825, N = 15 SE +/- 0.1937, N = 4 SE +/- 0.2367, N = 4 SE +/- 0.0133, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0350, N = 3 6.2035 11.6926 9.6576 17.5040 11.5312 20.5399 18.9042 19.0719 10.1423 9.9139 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread MT/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s Per Watt, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Exhaustive EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0104 0.0208 0.0312 0.0416 0.052 0.020 0.030 0.046 0.029 0.028 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.41 / Avg: 312.36 / Max: 391.44 Min: 44.69 / Avg: 318.58 / Max: 450.37 Min: 38.46 / Avg: 253 / Max: 377.81 Min: 49.56 / Avg: 347.76 / Max: 540.56 Min: 51.56 / Avg: 348.75 / Max: 541.58 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 9371 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 7221 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 5187 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 7998 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 8254 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Very Thorough EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 4 SE +/- 0.30, N = 6 SE +/- 0.17, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 10.12 18.86 15.72 27.79 18.77 33.43 30.91 31.26 16.67 16.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread MT/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s Per Watt, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Very Thorough EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0169 0.0338 0.0507 0.0676 0.0845 0.032 0.050 0.075 0.049 0.047 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.42 / Avg: 314.16 / Max: 390.27 Min: 44.52 / Avg: 317.5 / Max: 448.44 Min: 38.13 / Avg: 249.95 / Max: 374.59 Min: 44.51 / Avg: 342.26 / Max: 539.9 Min: 50.48 / Avg: 349.22 / Max: 541.59 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 9634 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 7197 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 5166 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 8100 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 8265 Joules per run.
OpenFOAM OpenFOAM is the leading free, open-source software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This test profile currently uses the drivaerFastback test case for analyzing automotive aerodynamics or alternatively the older motorBike input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 41.94 23.91 57.57 34.07 78.07 47.75 45.99 46.18 32.12 30.93 MIN: 20.28 / MAX: 62.17 MIN: 19.38 / MAX: 185.93 MIN: 34.99 / MAX: 106.02 MIN: 25.56 / MAX: 407.44 MIN: 33.39 / MAX: 161.89 MIN: 29.05 / MAX: 957.44 MIN: 18.62 / MAX: 990.48 MIN: 18.46 / MAX: 904.84 MIN: 22.18 / MAX: 664.17 MIN: 19.37 / MAX: 810.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.39 / Avg: 372.05 / Max: 401.3 Min: 44.75 / Avg: 437.08 / Max: 487.92 Min: 38.8 / Avg: 364.44 / Max: 409.95 Min: 51.04 / Avg: 388.55 / Max: 437.69 Min: 50.97 / Avg: 412.06 / Max: 468.09 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 24059 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 28556 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 24053 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 25644 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 27196 Joules per run.
ASKAP ASKAP is a set of benchmarks from the Australian SKA Pathfinder. The principal ASKAP benchmarks are the Hogbom Clean Benchmark (tHogbomClean) and Convolutional Resamping Benchmark (tConvolve) as well as some previous ASKAP benchmarks being included as well for OpenCL and CUDA execution of tConvolve. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 395.30, N = 3 SE +/- 790.67, N = 3 SE +/- 455.47, N = 13 SE +/- 440.93, N = 3 SE +/- 1398.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1657.92, N = 12 SE +/- 419.72, N = 3 SE +/- 777.47, N = 3 43732.6 83966.6 70762.8 140735.0 46390.5 91052.3 109084.0 106388.0 55247.6 57532.6 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 369.83, N = 3 SE +/- 676.07, N = 3 SE +/- 438.43, N = 3 SE +/- 818.00, N = 3 SE +/- 526.44, N = 13 SE +/- 410.63, N = 3 SE +/- 1048.51, N = 3 SE +/- 594.12, N = 12 SE +/- 382.37, N = 3 SE +/- 981.85, N = 3 48448.0 92620.1 74093.3 143952.0 44845.2 87875.8 123498.0 126296.0 69589.8 68109.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp Mpix/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 146.79 207.54 144.36 185.54 175.15 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.32 / Avg: 330.04 / Max: 400.04 Min: 45.02 / Avg: 357.02 / Max: 474.43 Min: 38.21 / Avg: 310.65 / Max: 396.72 Min: 44.21 / Avg: 375.07 / Max: 528.33 Min: 49.26 / Avg: 388.87 / Max: 513.68 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 8141 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 14162 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 20670 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 16878 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15295 Joules per run.
Coremark This is a test of EEMBC CoreMark processor benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 4584.67, N = 3 SE +/- 7793.79, N = 4 SE +/- 10789.95, N = 3 SE +/- 18916.54, N = 3 SE +/- 2487.95, N = 3 SE +/- 27195.07, N = 3 SE +/- 91145.15, N = 15 SE +/- 16938.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1719.10, N = 3 SE +/- 11988.52, N = 3 3884226.13 5642216.37 6042366.34 12443517.84 4247085.81 4378483.08 9430899.09 9614029.98 5133862.58 4548209.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt Iterations/Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12356.08 14585.74 16273.75 12456.43 10811.88 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.04 / Avg: 314.36 / Max: 399.59 Min: 44.74 / Avg: 414.27 / Max: 479.84 Min: 37.62 / Avg: 260.98 / Max: 347.04 Min: 44.16 / Avg: 412.15 / Max: 528.16 Min: 44.08 / Avg: 420.67 / Max: 538.7 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 8173 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 23751 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 6524 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15387 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 22155 Joules per run.
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 6 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.02, N = 7 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.03, N = 7 SE +/- 0.04, N = 6 SE +/- 0.03, N = 6 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 14.63 7.55 9.46 5.10 8.20 4.58 6.55 6.45 10.88 11.03 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.3 / Avg: 298.77 / Max: 388.66 Min: 44.7 / Avg: 317.62 / Max: 461.24 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 251.72 / Max: 384.38 Min: 50.36 / Avg: 356.9 / Max: 540.66 Min: 52.21 / Avg: 358.27 / Max: 541.03 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 5677 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 4320 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3222 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 5532 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 5643 Joules per run.
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Xcompact3d Incompact3d is a Fortran-MPI based, finite difference high-performance code for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation and as many as you need scalar transport equations. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.26, N = 3 SE +/- 1.66, N = 12 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 SE +/- 4.41, N = 12 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 1.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 217.38 124.42 199.84 159.85 196.32 99.06 81.41 68.62 170.91 143.37 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.23 / Avg: 389.84 / Max: 399.75 Min: 44.86 / Avg: 401.65 / Max: 443.92 Min: 38.35 / Avg: 357.77 / Max: 389.51 Min: 48.47 / Avg: 426.01 / Max: 464.59 Min: 50.4 / Avg: 458.4 / Max: 493.86 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 86804 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 82874 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 73462 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 77108 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 70440 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.60 4.56 6.61 6.28 8.38 7.85 2.68 2.67 2.80 2.79 MIN: 2.36 / MAX: 11.16 MIN: 3.86 / MAX: 37.1 MIN: 2.25 / MAX: 28.15 MIN: 4.82 / MAX: 54.92 MIN: 2.46 / MAX: 47.2 MIN: 5.96 / MAX: 36.31 MIN: 1.82 / MAX: 138.07 MIN: 1.82 / MAX: 85.05 MIN: 1.99 / MAX: 53.73 MIN: 1.97 / MAX: 92.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.76 / Avg: 330.61 / Max: 355.41 Min: 44.8 / Avg: 363.16 / Max: 388.4 Min: 38.71 / Avg: 333.47 / Max: 358.85 Min: 50.62 / Avg: 378.87 / Max: 411.81 Min: 51.32 / Avg: 390.04 / Max: 433.77 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 21159 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 23242 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 21453 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 24753 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 25612 Joules per run.
7-Zip Compression This is a test of 7-Zip compression/decompression with its integrated benchmark feature. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 344.02, N = 3 SE +/- 12489.37, N = 3 SE +/- 276.36, N = 3 SE +/- 11779.84, N = 6 SE +/- 150.31, N = 3 SE +/- 8951.72, N = 15 SE +/- 34967.05, N = 3 SE +/- 29199.31, N = 3 SE +/- 600.77, N = 3 SE +/- 1467.64, N = 3 527037 795218 846736 1342537 1001858 1650497 1182009 1294985 745557 740026 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC MIPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 1634.38 2269.16 3214.79 1869.24 1810.40 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.4 / Avg: 322.47 / Max: 400.8 Min: 44.66 / Avg: 373.15 / Max: 482.77 Min: 38.89 / Avg: 311.64 / Max: 408.21 Min: 50.09 / Avg: 398.86 / Max: 541.55 Min: 52.26 / Avg: 408.77 / Max: 540.5 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 9244 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 13558 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 14439 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 17151 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 17304 Joules per run.
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 35.65 64.69 55.18 98.51 64.80 110.89 74.72 73.80 51.07 49.93 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0412 0.0824 0.1236 0.1648 0.206 0.097 0.130 0.183 0.119 0.114 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.5 / Avg: 367.37 / Max: 400.9 Min: 44.73 / Avg: 425.84 / Max: 476.99 Min: 38.1 / Avg: 354.65 / Max: 403.75 Min: 50.79 / Avg: 429.35 / Max: 500.74 Min: 51.73 / Avg: 436.62 / Max: 504.41 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 29635 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 29809 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 24116 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 31628 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 32892 Joules per run.
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 SE +/- 0.06, N = 5 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 19.12 10.30 12.50 6.91 11.02 6.16 9.85 9.75 15.49 15.87 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.43 / Avg: 321.97 / Max: 398.24 Min: 44.85 / Avg: 338.57 / Max: 471.87 Min: 37.75 / Avg: 271.43 / Max: 392.59 Min: 49.78 / Avg: 377.81 / Max: 540.78 Min: 51.25 / Avg: 377.63 / Max: 540.35 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 7513 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 5756 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 4207 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 7745 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 7930 Joules per run.
Primesieve Primesieve generates prime numbers using a highly optimized sieve of Eratosthenes implementation. Primesieve primarily benchmarks the CPU's L1/L2 cache performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 12.1 Length: 1e13 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.032, N = 3 SE +/- 0.039, N = 4 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 SE +/- 0.013, N = 5 SE +/- 0.008, N = 4 SE +/- 0.011, N = 6 SE +/- 0.075, N = 4 SE +/- 0.044, N = 4 SE +/- 0.092, N = 3 SE +/- 0.184, N = 3 25.397 13.076 17.968 9.289 15.976 8.262 11.714 11.664 22.470 22.778 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 12.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.3 / Avg: 321.04 / Max: 393.12 Min: 44.62 / Avg: 342.49 / Max: 459.6 Min: 38.49 / Avg: 301.51 / Max: 386.95 Min: 49.71 / Avg: 429.04 / Max: 540.64 Min: 50.3 / Avg: 432.08 / Max: 540.03 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 9524 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 7535 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 6030 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 11441 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 11522 Joules per run.
srsRAN Project srsRAN Project is a complete ORAN-native 5G RAN solution created by Software Radio Systems (SRS). The srsRAN Project radio suite was formerly known as srsLTE and can be used for building your own software-defined radio (SDR) 4G/5G mobile network. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbps, More Is Better srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 140.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 137.34, N = 5 SE +/- 17.40, N = 2 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 SE +/- 68.65, N = 4 4804.7 8318.1 7954.2 11386.5 8940.9 13143.2 537.0 5629.8 5698.7 MIN: 3396.5 / MAX: 4805.8 MIN: 6791.9 / MAX: 8318.7 MIN: 5432.6 / MAX: 7954.6 MIN: 10860.6 / MAX: 11667.2 MIN: 7191.5 / MAX: 8941.3 MIN: 12154.3 / MAX: 13580.6 MIN: 4281.7 / MAX: 5631.2 MIN: 4282.9 / MAX: 5904.6 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mavx2 -mavx -msse4.1 -mfma -mavx512f -mavx512cd -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -fno-trapping-math -fno-math-errno -ldl Mbps Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbps Per Watt, More Is Better srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 7 14 21 28 35 17.93 25.99 28.62 21.27 20.47 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.56 / Avg: 268.02 / Max: 361.71 Min: 44.83 / Avg: 306.11 / Max: 405.75 Min: 39.02 / Avg: 312.37 / Max: 368.16 Min: 50.62 / Avg: 264.71 / Max: 306.83 Min: 51.34 / Avg: 278.36 / Max: 325.45 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 6075 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 8265 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 10204 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 9441 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 9812 Joules per run. Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Total
Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Embree Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs (and GPUs via SYCL) and supporting instruction sets such as SSE, AVX, AVX2, and AVX-512. Embree also supports making use of the Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.10, N = 6 SE +/- 0.86, N = 8 SE +/- 0.11, N = 8 SE +/- 2.40, N = 15 SE +/- 0.14, N = 8 SE +/- 3.96, N = 15 SE +/- 0.38, N = 8 SE +/- 0.57, N = 8 SE +/- 0.21, N = 7 SE +/- 0.27, N = 7 111.29 190.51 179.45 287.53 210.40 324.17 262.10 260.81 162.98 161.81 MIN: 109.32 / MAX: 113.75 MIN: 167.9 / MAX: 200.36 MIN: 175.01 / MAX: 186.64 MIN: 212.32 / MAX: 329.07 MIN: 203.25 / MAX: 221.34 MIN: 218.2 / MAX: 405.99 MIN: 227.47 / MAX: 315.15 MIN: 220.89 / MAX: 311.03 MIN: 156.25 / MAX: 173.86 MIN: 153.51 / MAX: 173.4 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.2309 0.4618 0.6927 0.9236 1.1545 0.429 0.700 1.026 0.557 0.546 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.44 / Avg: 259.5 / Max: 401.14 Min: 44.46 / Avg: 256.25 / Max: 473.57 Min: 37.98 / Avg: 205.11 / Max: 399.09 Min: 45.16 / Avg: 292.53 / Max: 534.34 Min: 50.04 / Avg: 296.53 / Max: 535.58 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2855 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2178 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1641 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2675 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2753 Joules per run.
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark AMG is a parallel algebraic multigrid solver for linear systems arising from problems on unstructured grids. The driver provided with AMG builds linear systems for various 3-dimensional problems. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2000M 4000M 6000M 8000M 10000M SE +/- 7735064.17, N = 4 SE +/- 28997258.41, N = 4 SE +/- 6342005.91, N = 3 SE +/- 6625553.97, N = 3 SE +/- 2247127.13, N = 3 SE +/- 9734481.21, N = 3 SE +/- 8494773.54, N = 3 SE +/- 47352853.80, N = 3 SE +/- 4984066.09, N = 3 SE +/- 8646191.73, N = 3 3197611250 6007130500 3177082000 6201018333 2976345000 5829853000 6583859667 8546625667 3395003333 4483678333 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -lmpi Figure Of Merit Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 10869334.83 9501967.55 10018207.52 9949199.16 12678857.70 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 294.19 / Max: 401.39 Min: 44.44 / Avg: 334.36 / Max: 438.6 Min: 37.56 / Avg: 297.09 / Max: 369.72 Min: 44.26 / Avg: 341.23 / Max: 490.12 Min: 44.54 / Avg: 353.63 / Max: 508.45 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 5001 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 10254 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 14161 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 10692 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 9430 Joules per run.
NAS Parallel Benchmarks NPB, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, is a benchmark developed by NASA for high-end computer systems. This test profile currently uses the MPI version of NPB. This test profile offers selecting the different NPB tests/problems and varying problem sizes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 376.98, N = 5 SE +/- 2664.09, N = 6 SE +/- 878.07, N = 5 SE +/- 1941.42, N = 4 SE +/- 1227.63, N = 4 SE +/- 2144.25, N = 3 SE +/- 2163.37, N = 3 SE +/- 3507.67, N = 3 SE +/- 386.44, N = 4 SE +/- 475.06, N = 5 148567.25 318025.39 194853.91 317246.03 152747.87 273529.74 407367.97 425941.29 225918.92 263762.92 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.6 Total Mop/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 518.54 644.42 566.79 862.73 974.34 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.18 / Avg: 286.51 / Max: 399.68 Min: 44.76 / Avg: 302.37 / Max: 488.19 Min: 38.09 / Avg: 269.5 / Max: 413.08 Min: 45.25 / Avg: 261.87 / Max: 477.32 Min: 50.69 / Avg: 271.53 / Max: 516.16 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 4183 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 3991 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 4447 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 4124 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 4073 Joules per run.
uvg266 uvg266 is an open-source VVC/H.266 (Versatile Video Coding) encoder based on Kvazaar as part of the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.12, N = 6 SE +/- 0.42, N = 6 SE +/- 0.14, N = 6 SE +/- 0.77, N = 15 SE +/- 0.11, N = 5 SE +/- 0.66, N = 5 SE +/- 0.50, N = 12 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 4 SE +/- 0.18, N = 4 82.89 73.25 78.23 69.10 70.48 65.57 28.99 30.15 44.73 44.86 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0767 0.1534 0.2301 0.3068 0.3835 0.319 0.316 0.341 0.233 0.218 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.33 / Avg: 259.72 / Max: 393.48 Min: 44.76 / Avg: 247.77 / Max: 367.4 Min: 38.67 / Avg: 206.78 / Max: 302.82 Min: 47.28 / Avg: 191.64 / Max: 248.8 Min: 50.61 / Avg: 205.6 / Max: 267.09 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2944 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2932 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 2605 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 3402 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 3598 Joules per run.
High Performance Conjugate Gradient HPCG is the High Performance Conjugate Gradient and is a new scientific benchmark from Sandia National Lans focused for super-computer testing with modern real-world workloads compared to HPCC. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 60 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 63.90 101.90 63.67 64.02 60.70 93.62 127.62 170.16 65.22 86.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -lmpi_cxx -lmpi GFLOP/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 X Y Z: 144 144 144 - RT: 60 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0407 0.0814 0.1221 0.1628 0.2035 0.163 0.157 0.176 0.152 0.181 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 391.5 / Max: 399.91 Min: 44.64 / Avg: 405.99 / Max: 468.44 Min: 38.16 / Avg: 344.96 / Max: 387.51 Min: 49.91 / Avg: 430.52 / Max: 466.73 Min: 55.78 / Avg: 477.7 / Max: 503.77 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 99831 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 161447 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 215367 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 170341 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 143946 Joules per run.
NAS Parallel Benchmarks NPB, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, is a benchmark developed by NASA for high-end computer systems. This test profile currently uses the MPI version of NPB. This test profile offers selecting the different NPB tests/problems and varying problem sizes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1780.21, N = 6 SE +/- 5770.07, N = 15 SE +/- 5529.34, N = 15 SE +/- 6146.84, N = 5 SE +/- 3237.26, N = 5 SE +/- 10492.12, N = 15 SE +/- 1419.65, N = 3 SE +/- 4483.01, N = 3 SE +/- 1363.65, N = 5 SE +/- 537.94, N = 5 303092.49 560233.28 385558.53 835481.40 313412.10 675800.73 781325.16 771659.52 477450.80 474870.04 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.6 Total Mop/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1157.05 1391.90 1309.07 1944.59 1848.26 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.51 / Avg: 261.95 / Max: 399.75 Min: 44.78 / Avg: 277 / Max: 487.21 Min: 38.45 / Avg: 239.42 / Max: 392.4 Min: 49.35 / Avg: 245.53 / Max: 522.72 Min: 51.13 / Avg: 256.93 / Max: 523.54 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 3012 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 3065 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3112 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 3388 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 3546 Joules per run.
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 Blend File: Junkshop - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 6 SE +/- 0.09, N = 10 SE +/- 0.11, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 19.84 11.41 12.71 7.74 11.26 7.20 11.58 11.59 15.97 16.01 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.47 / Avg: 323.63 / Max: 400.77 Min: 45 / Avg: 350.75 / Max: 492.13 Min: 38.32 / Avg: 278.09 / Max: 409.71 Min: 50.93 / Avg: 369.78 / Max: 541.5 Min: 52.19 / Avg: 375.95 / Max: 540.44 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 7767 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 5963 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 4380 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 7765 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 7895 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 689.22, N = 3 SE +/- 2753.94, N = 3 SE +/- 1255.01, N = 3 SE +/- 2329.77, N = 3 SE +/- 2422.71, N = 3 SE +/- 2202.15, N = 3 SE +/- 633.69, N = 15 SE +/- 731.62, N = 3 SE +/- 358.48, N = 3 SE +/- 841.95, N = 3 173795.43 209059.97 190777.83 213655.87 208220.83 188168.46 79733.12 78708.75 119060.13 118934.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
Helsing Helsing is an open-source POSIX vampire number generator. This test profile measures the time it takes to generate vampire numbers between varying numbers of digits. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 12 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 15 SE +/- 0.72, N = 12 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 61.83 44.46 43.06 22.80 39.77 38.08 29.48 30.49 44.40 45.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.43 / Avg: 346.73 / Max: 373.14 Min: 44.89 / Avg: 388.84 / Max: 429.71 Min: 38.62 / Avg: 342.85 / Max: 387.21 Min: 50.73 / Avg: 459.53 / Max: 533.78 Min: 50.54 / Avg: 454.16 / Max: 541.57 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22769 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 18146 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 14971 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 22211 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 22405 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 SE +/- 4.77, N = 15 SE +/- 26.17, N = 12 SE +/- 5.55, N = 3 SE +/- 10.87, N = 15 SE +/- 10.41, N = 6 SE +/- 4.65, N = 3 SE +/- 1.77, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 650.80 1247.36 733.80 1720.93 640.09 1574.36 1026.29 1039.62 679.12 729.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
uvg266 uvg266 is an open-source VVC/H.266 (Versatile Video Coding) encoder based on Kvazaar as part of the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 SE +/- 0.30, N = 5 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 SE +/- 0.28, N = 5 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 32.60 49.66 43.85 53.27 55.69 53.66 20.98 21.05 30.13 29.97 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0457 0.0914 0.1371 0.1828 0.2285 0.104 0.140 0.203 0.104 0.099 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.51 / Avg: 312.94 / Max: 383.38 Min: 44.64 / Avg: 313.89 / Max: 407.23 Min: 38.96 / Avg: 274.27 / Max: 374.89 Min: 49.23 / Avg: 291.06 / Max: 362.18 Min: 51.36 / Avg: 304.14 / Max: 387.73 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 6885 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 5572 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 4114 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 6986 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 7401 Joules per run.
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 36.45 64.40 54.40 89.80 61.77 96.59 72.07 72.48 57.02 57.20 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0428 0.0856 0.1284 0.1712 0.214 0.105 0.144 0.190 0.175 0.169 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.26 / Avg: 346.84 / Max: 394.48 Min: 44.78 / Avg: 376.84 / Max: 448.56 Min: 38.23 / Avg: 325.94 / Max: 379.15 Min: 49.89 / Avg: 325.73 / Max: 423.03 Min: 51.82 / Avg: 339.42 / Max: 440.9 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 65436 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 64440 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 54541 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 56569 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 58945 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 36.40 64.08 54.39 89.40 61.69 96.30 72.33 72.21 57.34 57.30 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 3.1 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0383 0.0766 0.1149 0.1532 0.1915 0.095 0.127 0.170 0.142 0.136 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.54 / Avg: 381.68 / Max: 396.34 Min: 45.02 / Avg: 429.8 / Max: 449.29 Min: 38.4 / Avg: 362.82 / Max: 379.41 Min: 50.6 / Avg: 404.88 / Max: 428.27 Min: 51.33 / Avg: 420.69 / Max: 446.54 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 54580 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 53869 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 43780 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 50205 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 52166 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 2.60, N = 3 SE +/- 2.99, N = 3 SE +/- 5.84, N = 3 SE +/- 1.87, N = 3 SE +/- 10.16, N = 3 SE +/- 10.90, N = 3 SE +/- 14.42, N = 3 SE +/- 11.20, N = 3 SE +/- 9.55, N = 3 761.69 1336.72 1109.75 1875.78 1227.23 2005.81 1389.52 1383.84 987.91 1026.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
OpenVKL OpenVKL is the Intel Open Volume Kernel Library that offers high-performance volume computation kernels and part of the Intel oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 2.0.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 3.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 27.72, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 45.76, N = 3 SE +/- 43.45, N = 4 SE +/- 22.85, N = 3 SE +/- 8.19, N = 3 SE +/- 21.66, N = 3 2388 3971 3654 5663 4241 6278 3947 3908 3268 3291 MIN: 187 / MAX: 30690 MIN: 350 / MAX: 45576 MIN: 293 / MAX: 42376 MIN: 560 / MAX: 58963 MIN: 349 / MAX: 46699 MIN: 650 / MAX: 60644 MIN: 481 / MAX: 26338 MIN: 479 / MAX: 25430 MIN: 264 / MAX: 42594 MIN: 259 / MAX: 42493 Items / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better OpenVKL 2.0.0 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkCPU ISPC EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 6.722 9.156 12.597 7.647 7.574 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 2.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.22 / Avg: 355.24 / Max: 401.22 Min: 44.92 / Avg: 399.08 / Max: 477.59 Min: 38.06 / Avg: 336.66 / Max: 409.43 Min: 49.38 / Avg: 427.36 / Max: 531.16 Min: 55.92 / Avg: 434.52 / Max: 535.03 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 240263 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 272436 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 228705 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 290746 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 294749 Joules per run.
Embree Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs (and GPUs via SYCL) and supporting instruction sets such as SSE, AVX, AVX2, and AVX-512. Embree also supports making use of the Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 1.42, N = 10 SE +/- 0.14, N = 5 SE +/- 3.59, N = 15 SE +/- 0.14, N = 5 SE +/- 2.62, N = 15 SE +/- 2.56, N = 4 SE +/- 2.16, N = 4 SE +/- 0.87, N = 4 SE +/- 1.15, N = 4 117.90 187.07 191.78 248.77 230.97 303.87 296.45 295.11 188.80 186.81 MIN: 116.73 / MAX: 119.59 MIN: 168.09 / MAX: 200.84 MIN: 188.36 / MAX: 196.2 MIN: 183.45 / MAX: 296.21 MIN: 225.48 / MAX: 241.14 MIN: 224.62 / MAX: 342.7 MIN: 255.3 / MAX: 342.81 MIN: 251.9 / MAX: 342.7 MIN: 178.76 / MAX: 200.12 MIN: 173.28 / MAX: 197.67 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.3679 0.7358 1.1037 1.4716 1.8395 0.580 1.085 1.635 1.069 1.013 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.24 / Avg: 203.37 / Max: 400.41 Min: 44.63 / Avg: 176.74 / Max: 465.19 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 141.31 / Max: 395.1 Min: 49.43 / Avg: 176.65 / Max: 536.36 Min: 50.19 / Avg: 184.47 / Max: 536.75 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 3203 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2510 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 2063 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 3136 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 3321 Joules per run.
OpenRadioss OpenRadioss is an open-source AGPL-licensed finite element solver for dynamic event analysis OpenRadioss is based on Altair Radioss and open-sourced in 2022. This open-source finite element solver is benchmarked with various example models available from https://www.openradioss.org/models/ and https://github.com/OpenRadioss/ModelExchange/tree/main/Examples. This test is currently using a reference OpenRadioss binary build offered via GitHub. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 17.64 15.25 17.87 22.00 22.03 34.57 39.14 38.61 23.52 24.05 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.52 / Avg: 285.19 / Max: 399.06 Min: 44.86 / Avg: 295.01 / Max: 468.96 Min: 38.55 / Avg: 232.17 / Max: 388.99 Min: 50.19 / Avg: 312.39 / Max: 537.35 Min: 51.7 / Avg: 318.71 / Max: 538.79 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 7320 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 8850 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 9209 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 11767 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 12111 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: Chrysler Neon 1M EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 109.72 56.41 77.26 43.00 92.04 61.46 61.38 60.28 82.06 78.32 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.65 / Avg: 350.35 / Max: 399.98 Min: 44.91 / Avg: 364.12 / Max: 489.25 Min: 38.39 / Avg: 300.88 / Max: 408.44 Min: 49.81 / Avg: 370.13 / Max: 539.35 Min: 51.26 / Avg: 369.08 / Max: 540.56 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 45079 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 38597 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 38413 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 43059 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 41337 Joules per run.
uvg266 uvg266 is an open-source VVC/H.266 (Versatile Video Coding) encoder based on Kvazaar as part of the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 4 SE +/- 0.09, N = 4 SE +/- 0.35, N = 4 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.54, N = 4 SE +/- 0.19, N = 15 SE +/- 0.16, N = 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 28.82 44.62 39.14 52.45 50.96 50.80 20.72 21.08 27.32 27.28 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0412 0.0824 0.1236 0.1648 0.206 0.090 0.123 0.183 0.093 0.087 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 319.51 / Max: 384.72 Min: 45.28 / Avg: 318.43 / Max: 407.96 Min: 38.12 / Avg: 278.78 / Max: 375.62 Min: 44.79 / Avg: 293.73 / Max: 386.63 Min: 50.17 / Avg: 313.03 / Max: 396.84 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 7988 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 6130 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 4461 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 7637 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 8243 Joules per run.
Embree Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs (and GPUs via SYCL) and supporting instruction sets such as SSE, AVX, AVX2, and AVX-512. Embree also supports making use of the Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.08, N = 7 SE +/- 1.39, N = 8 SE +/- 0.06, N = 8 SE +/- 2.29, N = 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 9 SE +/- 3.10, N = 15 SE +/- 2.41, N = 9 SE +/- 1.59, N = 9 SE +/- 0.56, N = 8 SE +/- 0.37, N = 8 137.41 220.67 223.21 305.13 267.70 333.24 341.83 344.27 217.71 218.33 MIN: 135.82 / MAX: 139.45 MIN: 199.2 / MAX: 236.91 MIN: 219.93 / MAX: 227.73 MIN: 222.07 / MAX: 356.87 MIN: 262.05 / MAX: 280.59 MIN: 203.82 / MAX: 398.74 MIN: 287.85 / MAX: 403.73 MIN: 289.86 / MAX: 404.39 MIN: 205.59 / MAX: 231.05 MIN: 206.31 / MAX: 231.64 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.3362 0.6724 1.0086 1.3448 1.681 0.573 0.965 1.494 0.831 0.824 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.33 / Avg: 239.93 / Max: 400.8 Min: 44.72 / Avg: 231.42 / Max: 467.75 Min: 37.96 / Avg: 179.19 / Max: 397.59 Min: 50.08 / Avg: 261.98 / Max: 536.02 Min: 50.81 / Avg: 264.82 / Max: 536.59 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2331 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 1822 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1294 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2161 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2185 Joules per run.
NAS Parallel Benchmarks NPB, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, is a benchmark developed by NASA for high-end computer systems. This test profile currently uses the MPI version of NPB. This test profile offers selecting the different NPB tests/problems and varying problem sizes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 728.80, N = 15 SE +/- 1630.89, N = 15 SE +/- 618.06, N = 15 SE +/- 284.09, N = 5 SE +/- 985.07, N = 15 SE +/- 1862.43, N = 14 SE +/- 497.12, N = 3 SE +/- 804.23, N = 3 SE +/- 972.99, N = 6 SE +/- 875.41, N = 6 65470.23 127026.20 88208.36 93443.53 51319.46 68157.95 117352.19 118233.10 114186.45 112648.45 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.6 Total Mop/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 140 280 420 560 700 381.14 491.65 280.56 665.00 607.77 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.12 / Avg: 171.78 / Max: 399.7 Min: 44.31 / Avg: 179.41 / Max: 483.37 Min: 37.8 / Avg: 182.92 / Max: 399.7 Min: 43.87 / Avg: 171.71 / Max: 540.63 Min: 49.75 / Avg: 185.35 / Max: 540.56 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 1225 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 1364 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1683 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 1889 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2039 Joules per run.
Kvazaar This is a test of Kvazaar as a CPU-based H.265/HEVC video encoder written in the C programming language and optimized in Assembly. Kvazaar is the winner of the 2016 ACM Open-Source Software Competition and developed at the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.23, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.64, N = 6 SE +/- 0.17, N = 5 SE +/- 0.62, N = 6 SE +/- 0.50, N = 15 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.16, N = 4 41.30 63.26 53.95 78.79 68.82 73.11 31.92 32.34 39.66 39.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0635 0.127 0.1905 0.254 0.3175 0.146 0.197 0.282 0.152 0.141 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.44 / Avg: 283.8 / Max: 372.56 Min: 44.59 / Avg: 273.65 / Max: 377.98 Min: 38.09 / Avg: 244.27 / Max: 356.24 Min: 45.5 / Avg: 260.91 / Max: 344.81 Min: 50.94 / Avg: 280.96 / Max: 364.53 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 5179 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 4159 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3127 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 5023 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 5408 Joules per run.
ASTC Encoder ASTC Encoder (astcenc) is for the Adaptive Scalable Texture Compression (ASTC) format commonly used with OpenGL, OpenGL ES, and Vulkan graphics APIs. This test profile does a coding test of both compression/decompression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Thorough EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.06, N = 5 SE +/- 1.25, N = 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 SE +/- 1.05, N = 6 SE +/- 0.07, N = 6 SE +/- 1.60, N = 15 SE +/- 0.20, N = 5 SE +/- 0.71, N = 5 SE +/- 0.08, N = 5 SE +/- 0.16, N = 5 72.38 120.83 110.04 169.75 128.76 178.52 163.96 162.26 115.01 114.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread MT/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s Per Watt, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 Preset: Thorough EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.1818 0.3636 0.5454 0.7272 0.909 0.329 0.541 0.808 0.537 0.532 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.17 / Avg: 219.93 / Max: 386.4 Min: 44.54 / Avg: 203.27 / Max: 437.24 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 159.26 / Max: 364 Min: 43.99 / Avg: 214.28 / Max: 523.16 Min: 47.61 / Avg: 214.37 / Max: 519.61 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 3035 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2439 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1885 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2828 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2830 Joules per run.
Kvazaar This is a test of Kvazaar as a CPU-based H.265/HEVC video encoder written in the C programming language and optimized in Assembly. Kvazaar is the winner of the 2016 ACM Open-Source Software Competition and developed at the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.22, N = 5 SE +/- 0.06, N = 5 SE +/- 0.63, N = 9 SE +/- 0.16, N = 5 SE +/- 0.26, N = 6 SE +/- 0.66, N = 15 SE +/- 0.72, N = 15 SE +/- 0.20, N = 4 SE +/- 0.25, N = 15 40.32 62.79 53.42 78.12 68.61 73.11 31.89 32.24 39.21 39.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0635 0.127 0.1905 0.254 0.3175 0.141 0.195 0.282 0.148 0.140 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.41 / Avg: 285.5 / Max: 368.43 Min: 44.71 / Avg: 273.76 / Max: 377.94 Min: 37.99 / Avg: 243.28 / Max: 354.29 Min: 43.73 / Avg: 264.48 / Max: 382.76 Min: 49.68 / Avg: 281.35 / Max: 396.67 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 5425 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 4161 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3114 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 5157 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 5440 Joules per run.
GROMACS The GROMACS (GROningen MAchine for Chemical Simulations) molecular dynamics package testing with the water_GMX50 data. This test profile allows selecting between CPU and GPU-based GROMACS builds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2024 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 14.65 26.67 22.73 34.38 23.14 30.71 33.12 32.67 21.09 20.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm Ns Per Day Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2024 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.046 0.065 0.080 0.063 0.061 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2024 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.26 / Avg: 315.19 / Max: 400.05 Min: 44.64 / Avg: 349.18 / Max: 487.22 Min: 37.69 / Avg: 288.78 / Max: 417.16 Min: 49.47 / Avg: 333.31 / Max: 537.53 Min: 52.92 / Avg: 338.43 / Max: 540.14 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 6829 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 7449 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 8182 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 9888 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 10153 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Noise Suppression Poconet-Like FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 4.59, N = 3 SE +/- 93.20, N = 3 SE +/- 33.49, N = 3 SE +/- 129.79, N = 15 SE +/- 13.78, N = 3 SE +/- 137.22, N = 15 SE +/- 67.53, N = 15 SE +/- 71.88, N = 15 SE +/- 92.39, N = 3 SE +/- 41.62, N = 3 7401.31 11797.53 10557.16 11713.40 10251.07 11451.06 5172.09 5212.74 9577.04 9585.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl
CloverLeaf CloverLeaf is a Lagrangian-Eulerian hydrodynamics benchmark. This test profile currently makes use of CloverLeaf's OpenMP version. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf 1.3 Input: clover_bm64_short EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 9 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.56, N = 15 SE +/- 0.41, N = 15 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 21.12 18.90 22.09 23.17 24.11 26.85 41.88 39.16 30.45 26.04 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -fopenmp CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf 1.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.24 / Avg: 332.15 / Max: 399.36 Min: 44.63 / Avg: 333.72 / Max: 398.87 Min: 38.05 / Avg: 286.28 / Max: 339.66 Min: 49.69 / Avg: 290.14 / Max: 356.75 Min: 50.9 / Avg: 309.7 / Max: 386.14 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 8525 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 9010 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 8207 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 10252 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 9601 Joules per run.
miniBUDE MiniBUDE is a mini application for the the core computation of the Bristol University Docking Engine (BUDE). This test profile currently makes use of the OpenMP implementation of miniBUDE for CPU benchmarking. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 SE +/- 3.01, N = 4 SE +/- 3.07, N = 4 SE +/- 8.91, N = 15 SE +/- 1.89, N = 4 SE +/- 8.65, N = 15 SE +/- 3.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 SE +/- 2.16, N = 3 SE +/- 1.89, N = 3 244.07 457.79 386.18 485.50 428.05 471.20 294.14 291.98 226.84 223.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm Billion Interactions/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s Per Watt, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.3258 0.6516 0.9774 1.3032 1.629 0.763 1.087 1.448 0.529 0.514 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.32 / Avg: 319.75 / Max: 382.82 Min: 44.68 / Avg: 355.42 / Max: 459.93 Min: 37.81 / Avg: 295.71 / Max: 388.6 Min: 49.31 / Avg: 428 / Max: 540.04 Min: 50.83 / Avg: 434.53 / Max: 540.79 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 8100 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 6131 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 4805 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 11556 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 11732 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org GFInst/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 15.38, N = 3 SE +/- 75.13, N = 4 SE +/- 76.86, N = 4 SE +/- 222.68, N = 15 SE +/- 47.25, N = 4 SE +/- 216.37, N = 15 SE +/- 79.93, N = 3 SE +/- 21.42, N = 3 SE +/- 53.91, N = 3 SE +/- 47.20, N = 3 6101.79 11444.69 9654.58 12137.49 10701.18 11780.07 7353.40 7299.51 5670.88 5579.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
NAS Parallel Benchmarks NPB, NAS Parallel Benchmarks, is a benchmark developed by NASA for high-end computer systems. This test profile currently uses the MPI version of NPB. This test profile offers selecting the different NPB tests/problems and varying problem sizes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 39.21, N = 6 SE +/- 86.22, N = 15 SE +/- 55.66, N = 6 SE +/- 106.77, N = 5 SE +/- 113.41, N = 15 SE +/- 241.44, N = 15 SE +/- 72.69, N = 3 SE +/- 84.81, N = 3 SE +/- 52.01, N = 5 SE +/- 41.85, N = 5 7043.18 13004.25 8647.62 15104.57 7503.01 13762.10 14608.88 15317.80 8393.32 9381.50 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.6 Total Mop/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 9 18 27 36 45 30.31 40.04 40.83 38.54 41.04 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.23 / Avg: 232.35 / Max: 399.82 Min: 44.5 / Avg: 215.99 / Max: 421.15 Min: 37.84 / Avg: 183.78 / Max: 364.37 Min: 45.57 / Avg: 217.8 / Max: 485.18 Min: 50.55 / Avg: 228.62 / Max: 511.3 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2556 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2268 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 2169 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 3093 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 3201 Joules per run.
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation This test times how long it takes to build the Linux kernel in a default configuration (defconfig) for the architecture being tested or alternatively an allmodconfig for building all possible kernel modules for the build. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 Build: allmodconfig EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 SE +/- 1.72, N = 3 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 203.80 123.01 201.76 115.55 248.29 142.42 131.13 132.52 171.53 173.91 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.51 / Avg: 352.34 / Max: 401.17 Min: 44.41 / Avg: 383.82 / Max: 473.43 Min: 38.23 / Avg: 307.82 / Max: 388.17 Min: 43.98 / Avg: 382.69 / Max: 540.51 Min: 49.02 / Avg: 387.13 / Max: 540.51 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 74930 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 81243 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 79520 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 70798 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 72522 Joules per run.
Primesieve Primesieve generates prime numbers using a highly optimized sieve of Eratosthenes implementation. Primesieve primarily benchmarks the CPU's L1/L2 cache performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 12.1 Length: 1e12 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.4777 0.9554 1.4331 1.9108 2.3885 SE +/- 0.003, N = 11 SE +/- 0.003, N = 12 SE +/- 0.004, N = 12 SE +/- 0.006, N = 13 SE +/- 0.003, N = 12 SE +/- 0.008, N = 15 SE +/- 0.004, N = 12 SE +/- 0.007, N = 13 SE +/- 0.009, N = 11 SE +/- 0.007, N = 11 2.123 1.224 1.553 1.067 1.396 0.997 1.152 1.117 1.982 1.992 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 12.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.45 / Avg: 146.31 / Max: 375.7 Min: 44.74 / Avg: 147.17 / Max: 431.8 Min: 38.24 / Avg: 119.31 / Max: 378.83 Min: 50.88 / Avg: 204.31 / Max: 541.32 Min: 50.77 / Avg: 203.34 / Max: 534.41 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 891 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 822 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 636 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 1226 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 1239 Joules per run.
TensorFlow This is a benchmark of the TensorFlow deep learning framework using the TensorFlow reference benchmarks (tensorflow/benchmarks with tf_cnn_benchmarks.py). Note with the Phoronix Test Suite there is also pts/tensorflow-lite for benchmarking the TensorFlow Lite binaries if desired for complementary metrics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 2.59, N = 4 SE +/- 22.23, N = 4 SE +/- 2.78, N = 4 SE +/- 6.65, N = 3 SE +/- 17.23, N = 4 SE +/- 10.85, N = 3 SE +/- 9.51, N = 3 SE +/- 9.32, N = 3 SE +/- 16.50, N = 3 SE +/- 16.49, N = 3 2050.63 2481.87 2271.95 1789.67 2085.02 1494.77 1197.10 1169.47 1517.40 1520.86 images/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNet EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 8.736 9.558 10.778 5.908 5.722 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 38.49 / Avg: 234.72 / Max: 310.47 Min: 44.75 / Avg: 237.69 / Max: 322.78 Min: 38.3 / Avg: 193.44 / Max: 260.24 Min: 50.5 / Avg: 256.82 / Max: 330.52 Min: 50.66 / Avg: 265.81 / Max: 342.07 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 4577 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 4338 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3821 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 6420 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 6645 Joules per run.
Zstd Compression This test measures the time needed to compress/decompress a sample file (silesia.tar) using Zstd (Zstandard) compression with options for different compression levels / settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.06, N = 3 SE +/- 4.38, N = 3 SE +/- 8.42, N = 3 SE +/- 12.75, N = 3 SE +/- 3.17, N = 3 SE +/- 2.85, N = 3 SE +/- 1.43, N = 15 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 SE +/- 1.96, N = 15 SE +/- 1.14, N = 15 2081.2 2084.3 1726.4 1721.4 1520.5 1529.5 1000.4 1002.1 1076.5 1085.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma MB/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 4 8 12 16 20 18.19 16.38 16.54 10.80 10.03 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 38.15 / Avg: 114.42 / Max: 155.84 Min: 44.4 / Avg: 105.4 / Max: 130.49 Min: 38.01 / Avg: 91.91 / Max: 112.94 Min: 42.13 / Avg: 99.7 / Max: 137.04 Min: 44.44 / Avg: 108.23 / Max: 145.18 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 7895 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 7905 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 6281 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 7245 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 8377 Joules per run.
OpenFOAM OpenFOAM is the leading free, open-source software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This test profile currently uses the drivaerFastback test case for analyzing automotive aerodynamics or alternatively the older motorBike input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40 80 120 160 200 95.09 100.22 120.35 121.20 160.68 194.67 145.44 130.05 118.83 127.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfiniteVolume -lmeshTools -lparallel -llagrangian -lregionModels -lgenericPatchFields -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
Intel Open Image Denoise Open Image Denoise is a denoising library for ray-tracing and part of the Intel oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.783 1.566 2.349 3.132 3.915 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.03, N = 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.05, N = 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 12 SE +/- 0.05, N = 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 2.40 3.48 2.85 1.76 3.22 2.03 3.05 3.14 2.80 2.88 Images / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0029 0.0058 0.0087 0.0116 0.0145 0.008 0.010 0.013 0.008 0.008 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.44 / Avg: 292.04 / Max: 382.99 Min: 44.77 / Avg: 299.06 / Max: 406.13 Min: 37.99 / Avg: 250.72 / Max: 355.25 Min: 48.22 / Avg: 332.25 / Max: 473 Min: 50.88 / Avg: 356.81 / Max: 507.23 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 4965 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 4426 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3460 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 5233 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 5495 Joules per run.
GraphicsMagick This is a test of GraphicsMagick with its OpenMP implementation that performs various imaging tests on a sample high resolution (currently 15400 x 6940) JPEG image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Sharpen EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 301 437 403 555 445 595 374 351 307 302 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -ltiff -ljbig -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp Iterations Per Minute Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Sharpen EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.3456 0.6912 1.0368 1.3824 1.728 0.904 1.170 1.536 0.808 0.765 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.67 / Avg: 333.12 / Max: 356.17 Min: 44.97 / Avg: 344.34 / Max: 371.89 Min: 38.44 / Avg: 289.74 / Max: 312.13 Min: 50.13 / Avg: 379.87 / Max: 410.76 Min: 50.97 / Avg: 395 / Max: 429.71 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 21319 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 21923 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 18447 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 24312 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 25280 Joules per run.
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1.2285 2.457 3.6855 4.914 6.1425 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.85 2.82 3.88 3.79 4.97 4.80 5.46 5.46 5.10 5.10 MIN: 1.56 / MAX: 12.6 MIN: 2.56 / MAX: 16.26 MIN: 1.55 / MAX: 24.23 MIN: 2.86 / MAX: 24.24 MIN: 1.9 / MAX: 35.75 MIN: 3.37 / MAX: 33.24 MIN: 3.97 / MAX: 67.93 MIN: 4.02 / MAX: 73.01 MIN: 4.7 / MAX: 22.87 MIN: 4.6 / MAX: 22.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -shared -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2024.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.44 / Avg: 335.23 / Max: 360.83 Min: 45.13 / Avg: 382.72 / Max: 411.46 Min: 39.15 / Avg: 346.16 / Max: 374.36 Min: 50.7 / Avg: 415.62 / Max: 456.89 Min: 56.91 / Avg: 430.07 / Max: 474.35 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 21566 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 24749 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 22616 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 27431 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 28385 Joules per run.
7-Zip Compression This is a test of 7-Zip compression/decompression with its integrated benchmark feature. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 4011.15, N = 3 SE +/- 9910.65, N = 3 SE +/- 3530.77, N = 3 SE +/- 12021.47, N = 6 SE +/- 5680.94, N = 3 SE +/- 8746.31, N = 15 SE +/- 9035.03, N = 3 SE +/- 4862.49, N = 3 SE +/- 1083.44, N = 3 SE +/- 6455.42, N = 3 655241 970826 908159 1246609 1007150 1263152 915439 871812 709705 744325 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
Liquid-DSP LiquidSDR's Liquid-DSP is a software-defined radio (SDR) digital signal processing library. This test profile runs a multi-threaded benchmark of this SDR/DSP library focused on embedded platform usage. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 700M 1400M 2100M 2800M 3500M SE +/- 1319511.69, N = 3 SE +/- 20644477.34, N = 3 SE +/- 3925274.23, N = 3 SE +/- 1800000.00, N = 3 SE +/- 1602428.71, N = 3 SE +/- 5478138.37, N = 3 SE +/- 10019370.13, N = 3 SE +/- 3437214.63, N = 3 SE +/- 3590728.80, N = 3 SE +/- 5751811.31, N = 3 1817933333 3491133333 2855466667 2980400000 3181633333 3237200000 2839933333 2934633333 2327500000 2301200000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M 5494414.93 7237709.10 8815828.44 5269561.61 5186961.59 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.39 / Avg: 330.87 / Max: 371.63 Min: 45.35 / Avg: 394.53 / Max: 450.68 Min: 38.51 / Avg: 360.9 / Max: 416.68 Min: 50.69 / Avg: 441.69 / Max: 540.03 Min: 51.54 / Avg: 443.65 / Max: 540.73 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 11360 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 13545 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 12511 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15312 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15380 Joules per run.
TensorFlow This is a benchmark of the TensorFlow deep learning framework using the TensorFlow reference benchmarks (tensorflow/benchmarks with tf_cnn_benchmarks.py). Note with the Phoronix Test Suite there is also pts/tensorflow-lite for benchmarking the TensorFlow Lite binaries if desired for complementary metrics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 SE +/- 1.70, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.15, N = 10 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 SE +/- 1.75, N = 3 234.68 230.20 203.33 158.64 201.12 147.31 126.62 122.40 180.26 186.94 images/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.1739 0.3478 0.5217 0.6956 0.8695 0.773 0.659 0.702 0.540 0.525 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 303.72 / Max: 322.5 Min: 44.84 / Avg: 308.73 / Max: 332.29 Min: 38.03 / Avg: 286.49 / Max: 307.5 Min: 49.09 / Avg: 333.53 / Max: 378.38 Min: 50.93 / Avg: 356.04 / Max: 407.7 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 38674 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 45281 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 42686 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 57033 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 58865 Joules per run.
Timed Node.js Compilation This test profile times how long it takes to build/compile Node.js itself from source. Node.js is a JavaScript run-time built from the Chrome V8 JavaScript engine while itself is written in C/C++. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 Time To Compile EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 SE +/- 0.72, N = 3 SE +/- 0.74, N = 3 SE +/- 1.69, N = 3 133.86 93.31 109.56 88.81 117.82 100.30 138.20 133.70 166.77 168.77 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 21.7.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.63 / Avg: 313.86 / Max: 401.17 Min: 44.54 / Avg: 304.19 / Max: 485.17 Min: 37.91 / Avg: 257.75 / Max: 406.9 Min: 43.76 / Avg: 293.44 / Max: 541.92 Min: 49.25 / Avg: 299.08 / Max: 541.63 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 44045 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 35489 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 32304 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 51156 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 52738 Joules per run.
GraphicsMagick This is a test of GraphicsMagick with its OpenMP implementation that performs various imaging tests on a sample high resolution (currently 15400 x 6940) JPEG image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Enhanced EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 336 481 455 590 495 637 376 362 415 409 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -ltiff -ljbig -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp Iterations Per Minute Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Enhanced EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.4199 0.8398 1.2597 1.6796 2.0995 0.986 1.405 1.866 1.116 1.053 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.29 / Avg: 340.77 / Max: 367.52 Min: 44.73 / Avg: 323.89 / Max: 350.4 Min: 38 / Avg: 265.31 / Max: 285.06 Min: 45.35 / Avg: 371.79 / Max: 402.11 Min: 51.69 / Avg: 388.59 / Max: 431.59 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 21695 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 20729 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 17068 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 23795 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 24999 Joules per run.
Numpy Benchmark This is a test to obtain the general Numpy performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.50, N = 3 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 SE +/- 2.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 SE +/- 2.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 962.28 961.37 795.83 794.75 723.81 714.11 522.45 525.49 520.58 519.28 Score Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 10.291 8.603 8.873 5.752 5.442 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.08 / Avg: 93.51 / Max: 100.94 Min: 44.4 / Avg: 92.5 / Max: 99.71 Min: 38.02 / Avg: 81.57 / Max: 89.99 Min: 43.63 / Avg: 90.51 / Max: 114.4 Min: 44.51 / Avg: 95.41 / Max: 122.26 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 9070 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 10792 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 10468 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 12068 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 12436 Joules per run.
Zstd Compression This test measures the time needed to compress/decompress a sample file (silesia.tar) using Zstd (Zstandard) compression with options for different compression levels / settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 9.59, N = 3 SE +/- 4.21, N = 3 SE +/- 1.50, N = 3 SE +/- 2.35, N = 3 SE +/- 9.80, N = 3 SE +/- 5.67, N = 3 SE +/- 1.95, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 15 SE +/- 0.83, N = 15 SE +/- 0.92, N = 5 1970.8 1958.8 1636.4 1633.2 1469.0 1460.7 1064.0 1070.0 1131.5 1139.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma MB/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 5 10 15 20 25 19.41 16.71 16.95 11.94 11.25 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.15 / Avg: 101.51 / Max: 128.91 Min: 44.34 / Avg: 97.9 / Max: 113.71 Min: 37.89 / Avg: 86.68 / Max: 100.77 Min: 43.74 / Avg: 94.75 / Max: 124.31 Min: 44.48 / Avg: 101.24 / Max: 130.75 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 7207 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 7473 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 7050 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 8338 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 8909 Joules per run.
SVT-AV1 This is a benchmark of the SVT-AV1 open-source video encoder/decoder. SVT-AV1 was originally developed by Intel as part of their Open Visual Cloud / Scalable Video Technology (SVT). Development of SVT-AV1 has since moved to the Alliance for Open Media as part of upstream AV1 development. SVT-AV1 is a CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.47, N = 9 SE +/- 1.78, N = 9 SE +/- 2.17, N = 9 SE +/- 1.67, N = 9 SE +/- 1.44, N = 9 SE +/- 2.33, N = 15 SE +/- 1.20, N = 7 SE +/- 1.38, N = 15 SE +/- 0.97, N = 7 SE +/- 0.87, N = 7 294.41 290.08 281.59 283.54 248.70 255.41 160.33 161.64 179.14 180.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.5812 1.1624 1.7436 2.3248 2.906 2.583 2.421 2.524 1.662 1.604 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 38.15 / Avg: 114 / Max: 322.83 Min: 44.48 / Avg: 116.33 / Max: 294.81 Min: 37.86 / Avg: 98.55 / Max: 241.14 Min: 43.74 / Avg: 107.81 / Max: 226.55 Min: 44.66 / Avg: 112.56 / Max: 226.81 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 798 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 853 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 745 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 986 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 1013 Joules per run.
Liquid-DSP LiquidSDR's Liquid-DSP is a software-defined radio (SDR) digital signal processing library. This test profile runs a multi-threaded benchmark of this SDR/DSP library focused on embedded platform usage. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2000M 4000M 6000M 8000M 10000M SE +/- 6072982.06, N = 3 SE +/- 47503298.13, N = 3 SE +/- 14339494.80, N = 3 SE +/- 10838870.38, N = 3 SE +/- 10497036.62, N = 3 SE +/- 5544166.10, N = 3 SE +/- 23764329.01, N = 3 SE +/- 31563973.84, N = 3 SE +/- 9930480.57, N = 3 SE +/- 13819109.15, N = 3 5265866667 9586100000 8494733333 8570166667 8064266667 8093266667 7354300000 7439266667 6891466667 6852066667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M 14781256.88 20115931.63 23123930.33 15435164.83 15259867.89 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.36 / Avg: 356.25 / Max: 400.97 Min: 45.19 / Avg: 422.29 / Max: 487.56 Min: 38.42 / Avg: 348.74 / Max: 397.11 Min: 49.91 / Avg: 446.48 / Max: 527 Min: 50.85 / Avg: 449.03 / Max: 538.09 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 11994 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 14499 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 11857 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15180 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15267 Joules per run.
OpenFOAM OpenFOAM is the leading free, open-source software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This test profile currently uses the drivaerFastback test case for analyzing automotive aerodynamics or alternatively the older motorBike input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Zstd Compression This test measures the time needed to compress/decompress a sample file (silesia.tar) using Zstd (Zstandard) compression with options for different compression levels / settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 15 SE +/- 0.14, N = 15 25.5 25.1 21.8 21.6 19.4 19.2 14.4 14.7 14.5 14.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Timed LLVM Compilation This test times how long it takes to compile/build the LLVM compiler stack. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 Build System: Ninja EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 1.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.78, N = 6 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 SE +/- 1.08, N = 3 110.53 72.84 88.89 62.86 99.43 68.40 76.91 77.58 103.39 104.57 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 16.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.43 / Avg: 313.11 / Max: 401.21 Min: 44.38 / Avg: 300.12 / Max: 488.24 Min: 38.23 / Avg: 254.04 / Max: 404.43 Min: 44.39 / Avg: 302.57 / Max: 536.24 Min: 49.15 / Avg: 309.6 / Max: 540.43 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 38199 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 31012 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 28707 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 36006 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 37151 Joules per run.
srsRAN Project srsRAN Project is a complete ORAN-native 5G RAN solution created by Software Radio Systems (SRS). The srsRAN Project radio suite was formerly known as srsLTE and can be used for building your own software-defined radio (SDR) 4G/5G mobile network. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbps, More Is Better srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 224.5 224.5 183.3 183.3 129.6 129.6 129.4 129.3 129.5 129.2 MIN: 158.7 MIN: 158.7 MIN: 105.8 MIN: 105.8 MIN: 105.8 MIN: 105.8 MIN: 105.7 / MAX: 129.5 MIN: 105.6 / MAX: 129.4 MIN: 105.7 MIN: 105.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mavx2 -mavx -msse4.1 -mfma -mavx512f -mavx512cd -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -fno-trapping-math -fno-math-errno -ldl Mbps Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbps Per Watt, More Is Better srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 Test: PUSCH Processor Benchmark, Throughput Thread EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.6442 1.2884 1.9326 2.5768 3.221 2.863 2.215 1.751 1.662 1.520 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better srsRAN Project 23.10.1-20240325 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.34 / Avg: 78.4 / Max: 94.64 Min: 44.7 / Avg: 82.75 / Max: 94.11 Min: 38.32 / Avg: 74 / Max: 83.67 Min: 44.77 / Avg: 77.9 / Max: 86.18 Min: 50.61 / Avg: 84.98 / Max: 95.24 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 1145 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 1510 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1579 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 1714 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 1841 Joules per run.
SVT-AV1 This is a benchmark of the SVT-AV1 open-source video encoder/decoder. SVT-AV1 was originally developed by Intel as part of their Open Visual Cloud / Scalable Video Technology (SVT). Development of SVT-AV1 has since moved to the Alliance for Open Media as part of upstream AV1 development. SVT-AV1 is a CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.133, N = 4 SE +/- 0.082, N = 4 SE +/- 0.041, N = 4 SE +/- 0.031, N = 4 SE +/- 0.027, N = 3 SE +/- 0.107, N = 3 SE +/- 0.023, N = 3 SE +/- 0.075, N = 3 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 SE +/- 0.027, N = 3 12.457 12.350 11.275 11.136 10.015 9.921 7.409 7.170 7.462 7.453 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0167 0.0334 0.0501 0.0668 0.0835 0.066 0.069 0.074 0.056 0.053 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 38.27 / Avg: 187.33 / Max: 334.19 Min: 44.43 / Avg: 164.51 / Max: 329.5 Min: 37.84 / Avg: 134.83 / Max: 221.31 Min: 26.45 / Avg: 132.29 / Max: 185.55 Min: 45.34 / Avg: 139.38 / Max: 195.91 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 3372 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 3249 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3011 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 3748 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 3949 Joules per run.
Parallel BZIP2 Compression This test measures the time needed to compress a file (FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img) using Parallel BZIP2 compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.2843 0.5686 0.8529 1.1372 1.4215 SE +/- 0.009364, N = 15 SE +/- 0.007767, N = 15 SE +/- 0.010948, N = 15 SE +/- 0.006187, N = 15 SE +/- 0.009424, N = 15 SE +/- 0.011762, N = 15 SE +/- 0.021554, N = 15 SE +/- 0.012727, N = 15 SE +/- 0.017482, N = 15 SE +/- 0.013373, N = 15 1.263408 0.955400 0.934896 0.787357 0.891238 0.730743 1.012839 0.960310 1.147614 1.131788 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -pthread -lbz2 -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 38.23 / Avg: 104.29 / Max: 361.45 Min: 44.54 / Avg: 97.48 / Max: 318.96 Min: 38 / Avg: 80.55 / Max: 240.43 Min: 44.22 / Avg: 104.19 / Max: 320.86 Min: 49.71 / Avg: 107.9 / Max: 332.59 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 556 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 481 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 397 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 542 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 554 Joules per run.
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator LAMMPS is a classical molecular dynamics code, and an acronym for Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 54.79 75.91 67.78 80.00 66.77 67.51 93.66 93.74 68.27 67.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm -ldl ns/day Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0378 0.0756 0.1134 0.1512 0.189 0.141 0.147 0.168 0.144 0.142 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.36 / Avg: 388.85 / Max: 399.63 Min: 44.34 / Avg: 461.94 / Max: 488.08 Min: 37.84 / Avg: 396.7 / Max: 422.8 Min: 44.43 / Avg: 473.95 / Max: 535.12 Min: 48.95 / Avg: 475.09 / Max: 534.43 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 62864 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 61130 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 54084 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 64457 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 65404 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.16, N = 11 SE +/- 0.45, N = 10 SE +/- 0.31, N = 10 SE +/- 0.27, N = 5 SE +/- 0.48, N = 15 SE +/- 0.65, N = 15 SE +/- 1.61, N = 15 SE +/- 0.57, N = 15 SE +/- 0.84, N = 15 SE +/- 0.47, N = 15 42.85 66.73 55.79 72.71 55.02 61.49 71.95 71.54 51.72 49.93 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm -ldl ns/day Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.104 0.208 0.312 0.416 0.52 0.462 0.446 0.422 0.355 0.319 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 38.12 / Avg: 92.85 / Max: 302.46 Min: 44.53 / Avg: 125.04 / Max: 352.94 Min: 20.48 / Avg: 130.45 / Max: 330.94 Min: 36.54 / Avg: 145.82 / Max: 356.35 Min: 49.49 / Avg: 156.52 / Max: 370.27 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 557 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 800 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1052 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 1468 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 1586 Joules per run.
SVT-AV1 This is a benchmark of the SVT-AV1 open-source video encoder/decoder. SVT-AV1 was originally developed by Intel as part of their Open Visual Cloud / Scalable Video Technology (SVT). Development of SVT-AV1 has since moved to the Alliance for Open Media as part of upstream AV1 development. SVT-AV1 is a CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.58, N = 7 SE +/- 0.49, N = 6 SE +/- 1.10, N = 7 SE +/- 1.17, N = 6 SE +/- 1.06, N = 6 SE +/- 0.85, N = 6 SE +/- 0.72, N = 15 SE +/- 0.75, N = 15 SE +/- 0.26, N = 5 SE +/- 0.87, N = 5 121.05 120.50 118.16 120.23 104.64 110.83 73.73 73.03 79.71 79.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.1856 0.3712 0.5568 0.7424 0.928 0.790 0.778 0.825 0.583 0.558 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 38.13 / Avg: 153.24 / Max: 299.13 Min: 44.49 / Avg: 151.86 / Max: 281.96 Min: 37.85 / Avg: 126.81 / Max: 237.71 Min: 43.41 / Avg: 136.67 / Max: 235.15 Min: 45.33 / Avg: 143.06 / Max: 250.09 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 1576 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 1605 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1437 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 1941 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2003 Joules per run.
Liquid-DSP LiquidSDR's Liquid-DSP is a software-defined radio (SDR) digital signal processing library. This test profile runs a multi-threaded benchmark of this SDR/DSP library focused on embedded platform usage. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2000M 4000M 6000M 8000M 10000M SE +/- 9980647.94, N = 3 SE +/- 5228554.08, N = 3 SE +/- 6331139.97, N = 3 SE +/- 15230561.38, N = 3 SE +/- 21733844.57, N = 3 SE +/- 15209682.59, N = 3 SE +/- 112123547.93, N = 3 SE +/- 68230620.86, N = 9 SE +/- 32823213.33, N = 3 SE +/- 20137223.69, N = 3 5442600000 9010333333 8151900000 8179100000 8185800000 8157233333 8179400000 8550488889 7167500000 7064533333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M 15772371.31 19710155.44 23573051.76 15953254.33 15799318.46 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.4 / Avg: 345.07 / Max: 391.34 Min: 44.84 / Avg: 413.59 / Max: 472.3 Min: 38.82 / Avg: 347.25 / Max: 399.84 Min: 50.81 / Avg: 449.28 / Max: 540.58 Min: 51.66 / Avg: 447.14 / Max: 541.36 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 11732 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 14062 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 11807 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 15276 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 15352 Joules per run.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 500M 1000M 1500M 2000M 2500M SE +/- 1785434.90, N = 3 SE +/- 5731879.66, N = 3 SE +/- 1305118.13, N = 3 SE +/- 7718376.34, N = 3 SE +/- 1855622.09, N = 3 SE +/- 1689510.12, N = 3 SE +/- 17442399.25, N = 4 SE +/- 14895674.24, N = 3 SE +/- 14143824.72, N = 3 SE +/- 6349365.67, N = 3 1822933333 2037966667 2487400000 2524100000 2281700000 2288733333 1592425000 1615266667 1573933333 1553766667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1.4M 2.8M 4.2M 5.6M 7M 5541653.37 5913583.74 6644407.92 4094043.94 3872275.00 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.39 / Avg: 328.95 / Max: 377.37 Min: 45.02 / Avg: 420.62 / Max: 484.72 Min: 38.82 / Avg: 343.4 / Max: 397.49 Min: 50.28 / Avg: 384.44 / Max: 494.51 Min: 51.51 / Avg: 401.25 / Max: 509.08 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 11294 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 14301 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 11790 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 13199 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 13643 Joules per run.
WebP Image Encode This is a test of Google's libwebp with the cwebp image encode utility and using a sample 6000x4000 pixel JPEG image as the input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.1868 0.3736 0.5604 0.7472 0.934 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.83 0.82 0.68 0.68 0.61 0.60 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lm MP/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.006 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.2.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.16 / Avg: 94.97 / Max: 114.33 Min: 44.41 / Avg: 92.51 / Max: 106.07 Min: 37.81 / Avg: 83.04 / Max: 93.82 Min: 43.79 / Avg: 86.1 / Max: 99.26 Min: 45.87 / Avg: 92.48 / Max: 106.47 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 3134 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 3670 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 3599 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 4248 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 4655 Joules per run.
FFmpeg This is a benchmark of the FFmpeg multimedia framework. The FFmpeg test profile is making use of a modified version of vbench from Columbia University's Architecture and Design Lab (ARCADE) [http://arcade.cs.columbia.edu/vbench/] that is a benchmark for video-as-a-service workloads. The test profile offers the options of a range of vbench scenarios based on freely distributable video content and offers the options of using the x264 or x265 video encoders for transcoding. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 79.53 75.32 66.60 66.42 60.11 58.08 50.31 52.22 52.32 52.69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFmpeg 7.0 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.1143 0.2286 0.3429 0.4572 0.5715 0.492 0.484 0.508 0.473 0.443 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 38.26 / Avg: 161.8 / Max: 225.96 Min: 44.41 / Avg: 137.53 / Max: 175.96 Min: 37.86 / Avg: 118.25 / Max: 149.26 Min: 43.58 / Avg: 110.71 / Max: 145.64 Min: 44.69 / Avg: 118.84 / Max: 152.66 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 18122 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 18291 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 17383 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 18562 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 19807 Joules per run.
SecureMark SecureMark is an objective, standardized benchmarking framework for measuring the efficiency of cryptographic processing solutions developed by EEMBC. SecureMark-TLS is benchmarking Transport Layer Security performance with a focus on IoT/edge computing. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org marks, More Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 602.41, N = 3 SE +/- 971.00, N = 3 SE +/- 809.78, N = 3 SE +/- 3539.07, N = 3 SE +/- 1741.58, N = 3 SE +/- 1470.47, N = 3 SE +/- 736.41, N = 3 SE +/- 326.83, N = 3 SE +/- 941.67, N = 3 SE +/- 899.27, N = 3 491451 497771 405454 402514 365533 365734 316561 318454 317006 316440 1. (CC) gcc options: -pedantic -O3 marks Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org marks Per Watt, More Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 5300.98 4437.20 4523.07 3911.12 3567.19 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.13 / Avg: 92.71 / Max: 96.64 Min: 44.3 / Avg: 91.38 / Max: 93.87 Min: 37.67 / Avg: 80.82 / Max: 82.72 Min: 40.53 / Avg: 81.05 / Max: 87.28 Min: 44.52 / Avg: 88.71 / Max: 96.04 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 26422 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 26012 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 22925 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 23046 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 25252 Joules per run.
GraphicsMagick This is a test of GraphicsMagick with its OpenMP implementation that performs various imaging tests on a sample high resolution (currently 15400 x 6940) JPEG image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Noise-Gaussian EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 SE +/- 2.96, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 291 335 313 339 296 326 216 218 225 226 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -ltiff -ljbig -lsharpyuv -lwebp -lwebpmux -lfreetype -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lxml2 -lzstd -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lpthread -lgomp Iterations Per Minute Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 Operation: Noise-Gaussian EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.4003 0.8006 1.2009 1.6012 2.0015 1.295 1.505 1.779 1.138 1.067 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.43 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 38.42 / Avg: 224.7 / Max: 243.79 Min: 44.65 / Avg: 207.96 / Max: 234.1 Min: 38.31 / Avg: 166.42 / Max: 181.2 Min: 49.05 / Avg: 197.66 / Max: 217.92 Min: 51.88 / Avg: 211.75 / Max: 232.35 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 14456 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 13240 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 10595 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 12651 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 13622 Joules per run.
TensorFlow This is a benchmark of the TensorFlow deep learning framework using the TensorFlow reference benchmarks (tensorflow/benchmarks with tf_cnn_benchmarks.py). Note with the Phoronix Test Suite there is also pts/tensorflow-lite for benchmarking the TensorFlow Lite binaries if desired for complementary metrics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 2.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 SE +/- 2.02, N = 3 SE +/- 2.21, N = 4 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 254.02 279.74 246.24 210.75 247.22 204.43 178.53 180.57 223.12 234.72 images/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.1843 0.3686 0.5529 0.7372 0.9215 0.772 0.730 0.819 0.592 0.598 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.16.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.41 / Avg: 329.18 / Max: 346.79 Min: 45.08 / Avg: 337.16 / Max: 361.72 Min: 38.17 / Avg: 301.7 / Max: 329.65 Min: 49.72 / Avg: 376.95 / Max: 425.38 Min: 55.61 / Avg: 392.45 / Max: 448.78 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 75493 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 80019 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 71906 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 102155 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 100990 Joules per run.
Zstd Compression This test measures the time needed to compress/decompress a sample file (silesia.tar) using Zstd (Zstandard) compression with options for different compression levels / settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.4 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 5 11.80 11.80 10.20 10.20 9.29 9.32 8.01 7.76 8.34 8.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
libavif avifenc This is a test of the AOMedia libavif library testing the encoding of a JPEG image to AV1 Image Format (AVIF). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 1.0 Encoder Speed: 0 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 40.85 40.35 47.47 48.12 53.27 53.62 60.95 60.92 60.48 60.41 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.18 / Avg: 201.19 / Max: 399.64 Min: 44.44 / Avg: 187.57 / Max: 419.93 Min: 37.96 / Avg: 147.89 / Max: 311.55 Min: 43.89 / Avg: 164.43 / Max: 411.87 Min: 44.43 / Avg: 172.25 / Max: 430.75 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 9054 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 9629 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 8479 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 10633 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 11139 Joules per run.
Liquid-DSP LiquidSDR's Liquid-DSP is a software-defined radio (SDR) digital signal processing library. This test profile runs a multi-threaded benchmark of this SDR/DSP library focused on embedded platform usage. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 666.67, N = 3 SE +/- 17227.24, N = 3 SE +/- 13860.42, N = 3 SE +/- 33406.59, N = 3 SE +/- 244710.59, N = 12 SE +/- 247954.07, N = 12 SE +/- 180132.50, N = 6 SE +/- 220782.83, N = 5 SE +/- 199860.23, N = 3 SE +/- 144743.84, N = 3 28274667 28311333 23093667 23144000 20527750 20616917 18969500 20281600 20136667 20180667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 512 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 325399.16 264402.01 266440.14 255967.56 238886.27 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.12 / Avg: 86.89 / Max: 94.04 Min: 44.45 / Avg: 87.34 / Max: 93.66 Min: 37.87 / Avg: 77.04 / Max: 82.48 Min: 43.54 / Avg: 78.67 / Max: 86.51 Min: 44.68 / Avg: 84.48 / Max: 89.98 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2954 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2999 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 2620 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2675 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2872 Joules per run.
QMCPACK QMCPACK is a modern high-performance open-source Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulation code making use of MPI for this benchmark of the H20 example code. QMCPACK is an open-source production level many-body ab initio Quantum Monte Carlo code for computing the electronic structure of atoms, molecules, and solids. QMCPACK is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Execution Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 Input: Li2_STO_ae EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.93, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 72.93 64.50 79.02 75.25 94.59 93.26 88.06 86.54 86.64 86.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -foffload=disable -finline-limit=1000 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -ffast-math -march=native -O3 -lm -ldl CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.17.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.67 / Avg: 376.42 / Max: 399.78 Min: 44.91 / Avg: 441.83 / Max: 480.46 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 360 / Max: 391.3 Min: 50.21 / Avg: 464.47 / Max: 540.46 Min: 50.89 / Avg: 463.87 / Max: 540.59 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 29110 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 37408 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 36600 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 44589 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 44686 Joules per run.
Timed Gem5 Compilation This test times how long it takes to compile Gem5. Gem5 is a simulator for computer system architecture research. Gem5 is widely used for computer architecture research within the industry, academia, and more. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 Time To Compile EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 1.52, N = 3 SE +/- 1.40, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.48, N = 3 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 SE +/- 1.05, N = 3 SE +/- 1.12, N = 3 130.80 109.05 128.13 120.47 140.59 132.36 155.72 154.82 156.27 159.67 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Gem5 Compilation 23.0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.45 / Avg: 211.78 / Max: 401.27 Min: 44.36 / Avg: 195.45 / Max: 485.43 Min: 37.8 / Avg: 163.63 / Max: 402.39 Min: 44.49 / Avg: 188.29 / Max: 541.07 Min: 48.83 / Avg: 194.2 / Max: 539.96 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 28661 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 25994 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 23835 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 30377 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 32042 Joules per run.
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation This test times how long it takes to compile the Godot Game Engine. Godot is a popular, open-source, cross-platform 2D/3D game engine and is built using the SCons build system and targeting the X11 platform. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 Time To Compile EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 1.21, N = 3 SE +/- 1.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 83.44 72.70 83.29 81.68 91.05 88.10 102.87 98.75 103.40 105.02 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.51 / Avg: 249.06 / Max: 401.18 Min: 44.54 / Avg: 220.41 / Max: 490.55 Min: 39.23 / Avg: 177.17 / Max: 410.15 Min: 44.44 / Avg: 221.2 / Max: 529.28 Min: 48.59 / Avg: 227.28 / Max: 536.13 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 22000 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 19543 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 17067 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 24111 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 25153 Joules per run.
OpenRadioss OpenRadioss is an open-source AGPL-licensed finite element solver for dynamic event analysis OpenRadioss is based on Altair Radioss and open-sourced in 2022. This open-source finite element solver is benchmarked with various example models available from https://www.openradioss.org/models/ and https://github.com/OpenRadioss/ModelExchange/tree/main/Examples. This test is currently using a reference OpenRadioss binary build offered via GitHub. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 89.66 66.58 73.67 64.06 77.76 76.82 91.67 88.08 81.23 83.64 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2023.09.15 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.82 / Avg: 369.55 / Max: 399.97 Min: 44.92 / Avg: 423.73 / Max: 488.83 Min: 38.91 / Avg: 344.22 / Max: 406.69 Min: 49.58 / Avg: 428.78 / Max: 535.12 Min: 51.29 / Avg: 432.48 / Max: 536.02 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 36093 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 35593 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 31209 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 40305 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 41806 Joules per run.
NWChem NWChem is an open-source high performance computational chemistry package. Per NWChem's documentation, "NWChem aims to provide its users with computational chemistry tools that are scalable both in their ability to treat large scientific computational chemistry problems efficiently, and in their use of available parallel computing resources from high-performance parallel supercomputers to conventional workstation clusters." Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
PyBench This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 1.58, N = 4 SE +/- 1.55, N = 4 SE +/- 1.70, N = 4 SE +/- 0.85, N = 4 SE +/- 2.21, N = 4 SE +/- 2.32, N = 4 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 SE +/- 0.63, N = 4 SE +/- 0.25, N = 4 SE +/- 0.75, N = 4 482 478 582 581 646 643 660 658 660 660 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.08 / Avg: 81.36 / Max: 97.55 Min: 44.38 / Avg: 83.87 / Max: 95.54 Min: 37.81 / Avg: 73.85 / Max: 83.62 Min: 43.38 / Avg: 76.46 / Max: 86.43 Min: 44.29 / Avg: 80.52 / Max: 89.72 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 1261 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 1510 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1458 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 1510 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 1590 Joules per run.
Liquid-DSP LiquidSDR's Liquid-DSP is a software-defined radio (SDR) digital signal processing library. This test profile runs a multi-threaded benchmark of this SDR/DSP library focused on embedded platform usage. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 63828.76, N = 3 SE +/- 37510.00, N = 3 SE +/- 3511.88, N = 3 SE +/- 89226.93, N = 3 SE +/- 154211.98, N = 3 SE +/- 27501.52, N = 3 SE +/- 577.35, N = 3 SE +/- 1154.70, N = 3 SE +/- 666.67, N = 3 SE +/- 881.92, N = 3 53801667 53881000 44054000 44101333 39896000 40100000 40679000 40711000 40725667 40727333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 32 EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 637828.74 512888.45 525714.32 516860.48 464033.76 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 38.35 / Avg: 84.35 / Max: 91.19 Min: 44.57 / Avg: 85.8 / Max: 91.9 Min: 38.09 / Avg: 75.89 / Max: 82.96 Min: 44.58 / Avg: 78.79 / Max: 87.1 Min: 50.88 / Avg: 87.77 / Max: 96.68 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2868 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2946 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 2606 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2679 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2984 Joules per run.
CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 19.17 / Avg: 313.09 / Max: 403.08 Min: 44.19 / Avg: 324.1 / Max: 500.98 Min: 19.04 / Avg: 275.17 / Max: 461.59 Min: 26.45 / Avg: 322.46 / Max: 547.86 Min: 25.15 / Avg: 331.79 / Max: 542.32
Xmrig OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.21 / Avg: 380.2 / Max: 401.2 Min: 44.9 / Avg: 424.95 / Max: 482.49 Min: 38.1 / Avg: 321.57 / Max: 344.6 Min: 45.98 / Avg: 395.18 / Max: 435.93 Min: 49.73 / Avg: 411 / Max: 459.91
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 11 22 33 44 55 30.52 46.77 48.04 38.41 36.76
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 508.75, N = 15 SE +/- 1026.14, N = 15 SE +/- 912.79, N = 15 SE +/- 1719.77, N = 15 SE +/- 53.68, N = 3 SE +/- 55.76, N = 3 SE +/- 193.00, N = 3 SE +/- 118.76, N = 3 SE +/- 126.20, N = 3 SE +/- 145.49, N = 3 11601.9 19870.2 19873.0 36154.1 15447.6 30636.8 29584.2 30133.8 15178.8 15106.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc H/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 11 22 33 44 55 30.52 46.77 48.04 38.41 36.76 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.21 / Avg: 380.2 / Max: 401.2 Min: 44.9 / Avg: 424.95 / Max: 482.49 Min: 38.1 / Avg: 321.57 / Max: 344.6 Min: 45.98 / Avg: 395.18 / Max: 435.93 Min: 49.73 / Avg: 411 / Max: 459.91 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 35486 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 24222 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 22295 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 37542 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 29455 Joules per run.
SVT-AV1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 38.05 / Avg: 114.51 / Max: 297.7 Min: 44.43 / Avg: 115.57 / Max: 288.05 Min: 37.9 / Avg: 100.02 / Max: 236.09 Min: 43.68 / Avg: 107.1 / Max: 218.44 Min: 44.7 / Avg: 113.22 / Max: 224.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.5576 1.1152 1.6728 2.2304 2.788 2.478 2.353 2.445 1.648 1.543
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 7.85, N = 15 SE +/- 7.78, N = 15 SE +/- 7.58, N = 15 SE +/- 7.82, N = 15 SE +/- 5.92, N = 15 SE +/- 6.82, N = 15 SE +/- 4.16, N = 15 SE +/- 4.79, N = 15 SE +/- 0.88, N = 7 SE +/- 3.86, N = 15 283.70 279.71 271.92 275.70 244.58 248.77 154.57 156.73 176.50 174.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Preset 13 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.5576 1.1152 1.6728 2.2304 2.788 2.478 2.353 2.445 1.648 1.543 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 38.05 / Avg: 114.51 / Max: 297.7 Min: 44.43 / Avg: 115.57 / Max: 288.05 Min: 37.9 / Avg: 100.02 / Max: 236.09 Min: 43.68 / Avg: 107.1 / Max: 218.44 Min: 44.7 / Avg: 113.22 / Max: 224.37 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 809 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 848 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 780 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 979 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 1042 Joules per run.
Intel Open Image Denoise OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.25 / Avg: 237.67 / Max: 389.95 Min: 44.55 / Avg: 237.32 / Max: 409.56 Min: 38.19 / Avg: 200.33 / Max: 356.27 Min: 48.25 / Avg: 262.52 / Max: 475.64 Min: 51.21 / Avg: 275.18 / Max: 506.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0077 0.0154 0.0231 0.0308 0.0385 0.021 0.025 0.034 0.023 0.023
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.02, N = 8 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.05, N = 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 7 SE +/- 0.07, N = 15 SE +/- 0.24, N = 12 SE +/- 0.23, N = 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 7 SE +/- 0.02, N = 7 5.06 7.04 5.85 3.52 6.74 4.35 6.42 6.82 6.01 6.25 Images / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0077 0.0154 0.0231 0.0308 0.0385 0.021 0.025 0.034 0.023 0.023 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.25 / Avg: 237.67 / Max: 389.95 Min: 44.55 / Avg: 237.32 / Max: 409.56 Min: 38.19 / Avg: 200.33 / Max: 356.27 Min: 48.25 / Avg: 262.52 / Max: 475.64 Min: 51.21 / Avg: 275.18 / Max: 506.36 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2411 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2272 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1803 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2663 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2713 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.33 / Avg: 240.22 / Max: 388.99 Min: 44.62 / Avg: 239.92 / Max: 408.79 Min: 37.97 / Avg: 199.83 / Max: 360.22 Min: 47.95 / Avg: 261.64 / Max: 473.84 Min: 50.36 / Avg: 273.7 / Max: 504.27
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0077 0.0154 0.0231 0.0308 0.0385 0.021 0.024 0.034 0.023 0.023
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.03, N = 8 SE +/- 0.01, N = 7 SE +/- 0.07, N = 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.09, N = 15 SE +/- 0.18, N = 15 SE +/- 0.19, N = 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 7 SE +/- 0.01, N = 7 5.04 7.10 5.84 3.64 6.73 4.24 6.75 6.32 5.95 6.17 Images / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0077 0.0154 0.0231 0.0308 0.0385 0.021 0.024 0.034 0.023 0.023 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 38.33 / Avg: 240.22 / Max: 388.99 Min: 44.62 / Avg: 239.92 / Max: 408.79 Min: 37.97 / Avg: 199.83 / Max: 360.22 Min: 47.95 / Avg: 261.64 / Max: 473.84 Min: 50.36 / Avg: 273.7 / Max: 504.27 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 2505 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2331 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1799 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2691 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2698 Joules per run.
LuxCoreRender OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 367.27 / Max: 401.13 Min: 45.04 / Avg: 431.61 / Max: 490.85 Min: 37.99 / Avg: 361.17 / Max: 413.35 Min: 50.62 / Avg: 453.08 / Max: 540.71 Min: 52.8 / Avg: 453.43 / Max: 540.55
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0221 0.0442 0.0663 0.0884 0.1105 0.061 0.074 0.098 0.049 0.048
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.25, N = 4 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 15 SE +/- 1.05, N = 15 SE +/- 0.69, N = 15 SE +/- 1.24, N = 15 SE +/- 0.35, N = 15 SE +/- 0.44, N = 15 SE +/- 0.42, N = 15 SE +/- 0.44, N = 15 22.26 31.30 32.02 43.95 35.22 51.55 18.85 19.77 22.13 21.89 MIN: 19.56 / MAX: 27.46 MIN: 27.72 / MAX: 45.55 MIN: 26.48 / MAX: 43.04 MIN: 33.51 / MAX: 72.83 MIN: 29.07 / MAX: 50.81 MIN: 38.2 / MAX: 85.97 MIN: 11.1 / MAX: 44.53 MIN: 11.1 / MAX: 46.94 MIN: 16.42 / MAX: 35.75 MIN: 15.78 / MAX: 35.94 M samples/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0221 0.0442 0.0663 0.0884 0.1105 0.061 0.074 0.098 0.049 0.048 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 367.27 / Max: 401.13 Min: 45.04 / Avg: 431.61 / Max: 490.85 Min: 37.99 / Avg: 361.17 / Max: 413.35 Min: 50.62 / Avg: 453.08 / Max: 540.71 Min: 52.8 / Avg: 453.43 / Max: 540.55 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 24332 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 28832 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 24198 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 30658 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 30984 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 374.73 / Max: 401.12 Min: 44.57 / Avg: 438.92 / Max: 482.64 Min: 38.15 / Avg: 365.97 / Max: 402.7 Min: 46.71 / Avg: 459.42 / Max: 539.94 Min: 50.16 / Avg: 462.8 / Max: 540.07
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0149 0.0298 0.0447 0.0596 0.0745 0.041 0.048 0.066 0.030 0.029
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.19, N = 4 SE +/- 0.44, N = 15 SE +/- 0.33, N = 15 SE +/- 0.95, N = 15 SE +/- 0.37, N = 15 SE +/- 0.68, N = 12 SE +/- 0.22, N = 15 SE +/- 0.23, N = 15 SE +/- 0.38, N = 15 SE +/- 0.35, N = 12 15.36 23.42 20.94 30.46 24.02 32.59 9.90 10.03 13.91 13.47 MIN: 14.74 / MAX: 17.33 MIN: 20.95 / MAX: 30.57 MIN: 19.5 / MAX: 27 MIN: 24.88 / MAX: 45.22 MIN: 21.26 / MAX: 31.63 MIN: 27.57 / MAX: 49.17 MIN: 6.7 / MAX: 24.04 MIN: 6.61 / MAX: 25.18 MIN: 11.25 / MAX: 23.63 MIN: 11.22 / MAX: 23.3 M samples/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0149 0.0298 0.0447 0.0596 0.0745 0.041 0.048 0.066 0.030 0.029 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.28 / Avg: 374.73 / Max: 401.12 Min: 44.57 / Avg: 438.92 / Max: 482.64 Min: 38.15 / Avg: 365.97 / Max: 402.7 Min: 46.71 / Avg: 459.42 / Max: 539.94 Min: 50.16 / Avg: 462.8 / Max: 540.07 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 24264 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 28530 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 23763 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 30138 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 30468 Joules per run.
Pennant OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.24 / Avg: 195.52 / Max: 397.77 Min: 44.55 / Avg: 210.49 / Max: 475.61 Min: 37.98 / Avg: 172.45 / Max: 384.3 Min: 49.62 / Avg: 197.07 / Max: 536.58 Min: 50.43 / Avg: 204.7 / Max: 539.09
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.7287 1.4574 2.1861 2.9148 3.6435 SE +/- 0.077441, N = 15 SE +/- 0.057646, N = 15 SE +/- 0.045208, N = 15 SE +/- 0.002996, N = 5 SE +/- 0.017533, N = 7 SE +/- 0.017578, N = 3 SE +/- 0.011251, N = 15 SE +/- 0.019165, N = 15 SE +/- 0.018745, N = 6 SE +/- 0.018539, N = 15 3.238866 1.783679 2.761260 1.472970 2.379513 1.312627 1.313149 1.336274 2.005280 2.004903 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.24 / Avg: 195.52 / Max: 397.77 Min: 44.55 / Avg: 210.49 / Max: 475.61 Min: 37.98 / Avg: 172.45 / Max: 384.3 Min: 49.62 / Avg: 197.07 / Max: 536.58 Min: 50.43 / Avg: 204.7 / Max: 539.09 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 1551 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 1768 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1700 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2266 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2347 Joules per run.
NAMD OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.14 / Avg: 276.01 / Max: 398 Min: 44.51 / Avg: 284.44 / Max: 425.63 Min: 38.01 / Avg: 135.27 / Max: 374.04 Min: 49.15 / Avg: 311.15 / Max: 442.87 Min: 28.33 / Avg: 337.04 / Max: 455.76
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0083 0.0166 0.0249 0.0332 0.0415 0.014 0.016 0.037 0.007 0.006
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00773, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01433, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00697, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07369, N = 10 SE +/- 0.01244, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02234, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07262, N = 9 SE +/- 0.07599, N = 9 SE +/- 0.05786, N = 15 SE +/- 0.07833, N = 12 3.80313 5.83620 4.62277 9.33439 5.03185 8.78522 0.37009 0.37969 2.12510 1.90525 ns/day Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0083 0.0166 0.0249 0.0332 0.0415 0.014 0.016 0.037 0.007 0.006 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.14 / Avg: 276.01 / Max: 398 Min: 44.51 / Avg: 284.44 / Max: 425.63 Min: 38.01 / Avg: 135.27 / Max: 374.04 Min: 49.15 / Avg: 311.15 / Max: 442.87 Min: 28.33 / Avg: 337.04 / Max: 455.76 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 9200 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 5973 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 12580 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 29787 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 29350 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 236.11 / Max: 397.58 Min: 44.76 / Avg: 214.79 / Max: 414.43 Min: 37.82 / Avg: 111.16 / Max: 382.95 Min: 49.2 / Avg: 288.87 / Max: 417.02 Min: 49.98 / Avg: 309.03 / Max: 425.78
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0403 0.0806 0.1209 0.1612 0.2015 0.056 0.066 0.179 0.016 0.014
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01402, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04873, N = 7 SE +/- 0.03197, N = 7 SE +/- 0.08144, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02345, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00508, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22460, N = 9 SE +/- 0.36731, N = 6 SE +/- 0.32206, N = 12 SE +/- 0.11480, N = 15 13.33516 14.75993 14.24493 32.45280 19.89936 0.82367 0.81700 0.60836 4.49222 4.34146 ns/day Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 Input: ATPase with 327,506 Atoms EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 0.0403 0.0806 0.1209 0.1612 0.2015 0.056 0.066 0.179 0.016 0.014 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 3.0b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.2 / Avg: 236.11 / Max: 397.58 Min: 44.76 / Avg: 214.79 / Max: 414.43 Min: 37.82 / Avg: 111.16 / Max: 382.95 Min: 49.2 / Avg: 288.87 / Max: 417.02 Min: 49.98 / Avg: 309.03 / Max: 425.78 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 5273 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2148 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 6855 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 11795 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 12794 Joules per run.
miniFE OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better miniFE 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.36 / Avg: 185.63 / Max: 399.93 Min: 44.6 / Avg: 184.93 / Max: 407.77 Min: 37.77 / Avg: 157.38 / Max: 341.27 Min: 45.54 / Avg: 174.65 / Max: 416.02 Min: 49.49 / Avg: 178.66 / Max: 460.12
OpenBenchmarking.org CG Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 372.32 373.42 414.89 277.77 342.05
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org CG Mflops, More Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 50.38, N = 6 SE +/- 2871.13, N = 15 SE +/- 78.85, N = 6 SE +/- 1770.73, N = 15 SE +/- 21.96, N = 6 SE +/- 1024.23, N = 12 SE +/- 943.79, N = 15 SE +/- 1837.30, N = 15 SE +/- 1392.45, N = 15 SE +/- 2253.61, N = 15 69114.4 52368.5 69057.1 45996.8 65294.5 62007.0 26404.2 32405.4 48510.7 61110.4 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi CG Mflops Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org CG Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 90 180 270 360 450 372.32 373.42 414.89 277.77 342.05 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better miniFE 2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 38.36 / Avg: 185.63 / Max: 399.93 Min: 44.6 / Avg: 184.93 / Max: 407.77 Min: 37.77 / Avg: 157.38 / Max: 341.27 Min: 45.54 / Avg: 174.65 / Max: 416.02 Min: 49.49 / Avg: 178.66 / Max: 460.12 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 1949 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 2034 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 1810 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 2806 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 2704 Joules per run.
Speedb OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Speedb 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.47 / Avg: 375.82 / Max: 400.76 Min: 44.64 / Avg: 398.15 / Max: 497.59 Min: 38.66 / Avg: 314.81 / Max: 417.37 Min: 50.62 / Avg: 382.35 / Max: 541.17 Min: 50.45 / Avg: 401.82 / Max: 540.54
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Read While Writing EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K 28692.82 46936.44 76045.35 51389.74 46292.99
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Read While Writing EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F 2P EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755 2P EPYC 9965 EPYC 9965 2P Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 91725.44, N = 15 SE +/- 581623.31, N = 12 SE +/- 433421.14, N = 12 SE +/- 1204634.08, N = 15 SE +/- 505667.36, N = 15 SE +/- 1920435.76, N = 12 SE +/- 419790.55, N = 15 SE +/- 597439.70, N = 15 SE +/- 299633.51, N = 12 SE +/- 310946.14, N = 15 10783281 19649893 18687897 34825934 23940015 46259704 35747722 37303792 19649049 18601575 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Read While Writing EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K 28692.82 46936.44 76045.35 51389.74 46292.99 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Speedb 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9575F EPYC 9755 EPYC 9965 Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 38.47 / Avg: 375.82 / Max: 400.76 Min: 44.64 / Avg: 398.15 / Max: 497.59 Min: 38.66 / Avg: 314.81 / Max: 417.37 Min: 50.62 / Avg: 382.35 / Max: 541.17 Min: 50.45 / Avg: 401.82 / Max: 540.54 1. EPYC 9575F: Approximate power consumption of 23977 Joules per run. 2. EPYC 9755: Approximate power consumption of 25449 Joules per run. 3. EPYC 9965: Approximate power consumption of 20148 Joules per run. 4. Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400: Approximate power consumption of 24566 Joules per run. 5. Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800: Approximate power consumption of 25851 Joules per run.
Xeon 6980P @ DDR5-6400 Processor: Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Intel AvenueCity v0.01 (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 768GB, Disk: 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 + 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10002f0Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: BHI_DIS_S + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 7 October 2024 11:48 by user phoronix.
Xeon 6980P @ MRDIMM-8800 Processor: Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: Intel AvenueCity v0.01 (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 768GB, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 + 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10002f0Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: BHI_DIS_S + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 26 September 2024 19:03 by user phoronix.
Xeon 6980P 2P @ DDR5-6400 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (256 Cores / 512 Threads), Motherboard: Intel AvenueCity v0.01 (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 1520GB, Disk: 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 + 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10002f0Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: BHI_DIS_S + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 30 September 2024 21:00 by user phoronix.
Xeon 6980P 2P @ MRDIMM-8800 Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon 6980P @ 3.90GHz (256 Cores / 512 Threads), Motherboard: Intel BIRCHSTREAM (BHSDCRB1.IPC.0035.D44.2408292336 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Ice Lake IEH, Memory: 1520GB, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92 + 960GB SAMSUNG MZ1L2960HCJR-00A07, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Intel I210 + 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x10002f0Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 25 September 2024 11:57 by user phoronix.
EPYC 9755 Processor: AMD EPYC 9755 128-Core @ 2.70GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 12 x 64GB DDR5-6000MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKC, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb002110Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 26 September 2024 15:49 by user phoronix.
EPYC 9755 2P Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 9755 128-Core @ 2.70GHz (256 Cores / 512 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 1520GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 980 500GB + 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb002110Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 28 September 2024 02:00 by user phoronix.
EPYC 9965 Processor: AMD EPYC 9965 192-Core @ 2.25GHz (192 Cores / 384 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 12 x 64GB DDR5-6000MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKC, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb101018Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 4 October 2024 14:32 by user phoronix.
EPYC 9965 2P Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 9965 192-Core @ 2.25GHz (384 Cores / 768 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 1520GB, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb101018Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 5 October 2024 15:57 by user phoronix.
EPYC 9575F Processor: AMD EPYC 9575F 64-Core @ 3.30GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 12 x 64GB DDR5-6000MT/s Samsung M321R8GA0PB1-CCPKC, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb002110Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 2 October 2024 15:16 by user phoronix.
EPYC 9575F 2P Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 9575F 64-Core @ 3.30GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD VOLCANO (RVOT1000D BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 153a, Memory: 1520GB, Disk: 2 x 1920GB KIOXIA KCD8XPUG1T92, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 24.04, Kernel: 6.10.0-phx (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-OiuXZC/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xb002110Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 21.0.3-ea+7-Ubuntu-1build1)Python Notes: Python 3.12.2Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 3 October 2024 14:07 by user phoronix.