QuantLib
QuantLib is an open-source library/framework around quantitative finance for modeling, trading and risk management scenarios. QuantLib is written in C++ with Boost and its built-in benchmark used reports the QuantLib Benchmark Index benchmark score. The QuantLib benchmark uses Boost::IPC for parallelism.
To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark quantlib.
Project Site
quantlib.orgSource Repository
github.comTest Created
20 January 2021Last Updated
4 June 2024Test Maintainer
Michael LarabelTest Type
ProcessorAverage Install Time
4 Minutes, 45 SecondsAverage Run Time
2 Minutes, 18 SecondsTest Dependencies
C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + C++ Boost + CMakeAccolades
30k+ DownloadsSupported Platforms
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 7 November 2024.
Suites Using This Test
Performance Metrics
Analyze Test Configuration:QuantLib 1.35-dev
Size: XXS
OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 374 public results since 4 June 2024 with the latest data as of 1 November 2024.
Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.
Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (QuantLib 1.35-dev - Size: XXS) has an average run-time of 35 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.
Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?
Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.
Notable Instruction Set Usage
Notable instruction set extensions supported by this test, based on an automatic analysis by the Phoronix Test Suite / OpenBenchmarking.org analytics engine.
Found on Intel processors since at least 2010.
Found on AMD processors since Bulldozer (2011).
Found on Intel processors since Sandy Bridge (2011).
Found on AMD processors since Bulldozer (2011).
Found on Intel processors since Haswell (2013).
Found on AMD processors since Excavator (2016).
Found on Intel processors since Haswell (2013).
Found on AMD processors since Bulldozer (2011).
This test profile binary relies on the shared libraries libQuantLib.so.1, libm.so.6, libc.so.6.
Tested CPU Architectures
This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.
Recent Test Results
Compare
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Graphics Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
Featured Processor Comparison |
|||||||||
|
2 Systems - 69 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - Dell PowerEdge R630 02C2CP - 98GB Debian GNU - 6.8.12-3-pve - GCC 12.2.0 |
||||||||
|
33 Systems - 367 Benchmark Results |
|
|
21 Systems - 3 Benchmark Results
|
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - ASUS Z9PE-D8 WS - Intel Xeon E7 v2 CentOS Stream 9 - 5.14.0-474.el9.x86_64 - X Server
|
20 Systems - 2 Benchmark Results
|
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - ASUS Z9PE-D8 WS - Intel Xeon E7 v2 CentOS Stream 9 - 5.14.0-474.el9.x86_64 - X Server
|
20 Systems - 2 Benchmark Results
|
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - ASUS Z9PE-D8 WS - Intel Xeon E7 v2 CentOS Stream 9 - 5.14.0-474.el9.x86_64 - X Server
|
10 Systems - 145 Benchmark Results
|
2 x AMD EPYC 9965 192-Core - AMD VOLCANO - AMD Device 153a Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.10.0-phx - GCC 13.2.0 |
Most Popular Test Results
Compare
|
3 Systems - 413 Benchmark Results |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U - Framework Laptop 13 - AMD Device 14e8 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.10.0-061000rc4daily20240621-generic - GNOME Shell 46.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
18 Systems - 442 Benchmark Results |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core - ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI - AMD Device 14d8 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.10.0-061000rc2-generic - GNOME Shell 46.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 Systems - 1012 Benchmark Results |
|
|
3 Systems - 26 Benchmark Results
|
Intel Core i7-1280P - MSI Prestige 14Evo A12M MS-14C6 - Intel Alder Lake PCH Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.7.0-060700-generic - GNOME Shell 45.2
|
2 Systems - 107 Benchmark Results
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X 64-Cores - System76 Thelio Major thelio-major-r5 - AMD [AMD] FreeBSD - 14.1-RELEASE - Clang 18.1.5
|
3 Systems - 111 Benchmark Results
|
2 x AMD EPYC 9734 112-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-22-generic - GCC 13.2.0
|
2 Systems - 29 Benchmark Results
|
Intel Core i7-1185G7 - Dell XPS 13 9310 0DXP1F - Intel Tiger Lake-LP Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.7.0-060700rc5-generic - GNOME Shell 45.1
|
2 Systems - 29 Benchmark Results
|
Intel Core i7-1185G7 - Dell XPS 13 9310 0DXP1F - Intel Tiger Lake-LP Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.7.0-060700rc5-generic - GNOME Shell 45.1
|
2 Systems - 50 Benchmark Results
|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U - LENOVO ThinkPad T14s Gen 2a 20XF004WUS - AMD Renoir Fedora Linux 39 - 6.5.8-300.fc39.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 45.0
|
Featured Processor Comparison
|
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI - AMD Device 14e8 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.10.0-061000rc2-generic - GNOME Shell 46.0
|
2 Systems - 107 Benchmark Results
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U - PHX Swift SFE16-43 Ray_PEU - AMD Device 14e8 Tuxedo 22.04 - 6.5.0-10022-tuxedo - KDE Plasma 5.27.10
|
2 Systems - 107 Benchmark Results
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U - PHX Swift SFE16-43 Ray_PEU - AMD Device 14e8 Tuxedo 22.04 - 6.5.0-10022-tuxedo - KDE Plasma 5.27.10
|
2 Systems - 51 Benchmark Results
|
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX - ASUS ROG Strix G513QY_G513QY G513QY v1.0 - AMD Renoir Ubuntu 22.10 - 5.19.0-46-generic - GNOME Shell 43.0
|
4 Systems - 71 Benchmark Results
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core - ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME - AMD Starship Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.5.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.2
|
Featured Kernel Comparison
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X 64-Cores - System76 Thelio Major - AMD Device 14a4 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.10.0-061000daily20240725-generic - GNOME Shell 46.0 |